Talk:Serial Killers Ink

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Discussion

edit

this should be deleted as its a commercial site using wikipedia to promote sales

Clearly the website is not using wikipedia to promote sales. Judging by the amount of press the website has received as well the refrences that are noted, the entry into wikipedia is relevant. The above entry was posted anonymously which goes against wikipedia guidelines and seems to be a malicious attempt to have the page deleted for irrelevant reasons. Donnie777 (talk) 18:03, 27 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agree. Also, it doen't sem in the best of taste (and I like Monty Python !) Autochthony wrote - 2032z 18 December 2010. 81.155.133.144 (talk) 20:31, 18 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Serial Killers Ink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply