Talk:SCN1A
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThe crystal structure provided on this page is not a very good choice: it shows but a fraction of this 2009 amino acid residue-long protein. My suggestion is to delete the image because it will mislead the lay reader. LossinC 05:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by LossinC (talk • contribs)
- Hi. Thanks for your contributions. Good point about the possible confusion caused by the image. Unfortunately this is the only available structure of any sodium channel. I have modified the figure caption to make clearer what is depicted in the image. I hope this address your concern. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 08:41, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
File:PBB Protein SCN1A image.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
An image used in this article, File:PBB Protein SCN1A image.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC) |
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:SCN1A/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
New to Wikipedia editing, so please bear with me: I made some minor adjustments in the Nav1.1 article yesterday. Mostly corrections of gene names (e.g., SCN7A does not encode Nav1.7, but SCN9A does) or other minor "test" changes to get my feet wet in editing. I also took out the crystal structure for Nav1.1 because it is in no way representative of the Nav1.1 protein. The pdb file used describes but a tiny fraction of Nav1.1 and I therefore suggest taking it out. I am will try and submit a topology in the next couple days. It's only two-dimensional of course, but I believe it's more representative than the crystal fragment that is being used right now. LossinC (talk) 00:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 00:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 00:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)