Talk:Sámi flag

Latest comment: 4 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress

Sápmi/Lapland

edit

I took out the entry that said Sápmi is also called Lapland. These names do not in fact imply the same area - Lapland is a part of Sápmi. See the article Sápmi for more info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.157.242.172 (talk) 08:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Colours due sex

edit

Blue for males and red for females is taken from Nordisk familjebok. But as you mentioned it there is need to clarify that both colours is used today by both males and females. This simply needs to be investigated further. // Rogper 13:19, 23 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

I think the right place for this information would be an article on gakti. Unfortunately jag talar inte svenska (although I did try to learn it once), and I can't find anything in English on the internet that is sufficiently detailed. Maybe you could have a go? Thanks. GrahamN 01:24, 30 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

i looking for a flag of Sami please contact me at : crackwindobe@voila.fr


Specifications

edit

Has anyone found any specifications for the proportions of the flag? What are the respective sizes of the bars, and of the circle? --Orzetto 20:39, 27 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

See http://www.sametinget.no/artikkel.asp?AId=166&MId1=1&Back=1, its in norwegian, but you should get the picture(!). ZorroIII 20:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Flag usage controversy

edit

A section about the controversy with regards to using the flag, and respecting the Sami flag days should be added.Labongo 21:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rule of tincture

edit

The rule of tincture is not too well-defined for simple tricolors; if you blazon the flag of Germany as "per fess, gules and or, a chief sable", it complies perfectly. AnonMoos (talk) 14:12, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sami flag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:37, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sámi Assembly of 1917 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:53, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply