Talk:Revolution (Beatles song)

Requested move 13 January 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Revolution (song) has been redirected to proper disambiguation section. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Dane ^talk 01:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

---

Revolution (Beatles song) → Revolution (song) – Revolution (song) redirects here, so it is the primary topic among songs with this title. WP:CONCISE is part of the article titling policy that calls for (in circumstances such as this) using the most concise name that sufficiently identifies the subject, which in this case is simply "Revolution (song)". The only support for the present title seems to come from WP:PDAB, an essay that was rejected as a guideline as it did not enjoy sufficient consensus (I've not seen anything that suggests this has changed since then). Thryduulf (talk) 02:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose, and make Revolution (song) a DAB page. There are lots of notable songs by this name, so Revolution (song) should itself be a disambiguation page. Revolution (disambiguation) is over-long for DAB page and should be split up.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  07:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose and follow normal en.wp practice so Revolution (song) redirects to main DAB. We must remember that no-one in the real world types "Revolution (song)", that's a reality we're creating. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose. Partial disambiguation just doesn't make sense; why have one song titled (song) when more than a handful of other songs have pages? Doesn't seem like that meets the "concise yet identifiable" criteria at all. Nohomersryan (talk) 12:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Because this song is the primary topic for all songs named "Revolution". If it wasn't, then Revolution (song) wouldn't redirect here it would point to the dab page. Thryduulf (talk) 14:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
    • Even then, it's not really a primary topic since it still has a DAB. What's the use of making the title ambiguous, then? If someone searches for Revolution, Revolution (Beatles song) is going to be more recognizable than (song) which could mean any of them. Nohomersryan (talk) 15:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose, current title makes it easier for readers to find the article via search bar. Same as Thriller (Michael Jackson album). Chase (talk | contributions) 23:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose per above; Revolution (song) should just redirect to Revolution (disambiguation). Life of Tau (talk) 03:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
• Comment: If consensus results in determining that Revolution (song) is a {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}, the redirect should probably target Revolution (disambiguation)#Songs. Steel1943 (talk) 03:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

• Agreed. Life of Tau (talk) 17:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

• Redirect Revolution (song) to the dab page and fix links. This is incomplete disambiguation and it shouldn't be redirecting to an article.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
• Support per nom. Easily the primary topic for songs called "Revolution". -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Revolution (Beatles song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110126162048/http://www.fabfour.de/vt183.html to http://www.fabfour.de/vt183.html
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/67xWDtjJT?url=http://www.eurotopics.net/en/home/presseschau/archiv/magazin/geschichte-verteilerseite-neu/achtundsechzig-2008-03/debatte-1968-2008-03/ to http://www.eurotopics.net/en/archiv/magazin/geschichte-verteilerseite-neu/achtundsechzig-2008-03/debatte-1968-2008-03/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Review of re-master version

One quote could be introduced in the Reception section that I've read in an online review about the re-master version back in 2009, where the reviewer said that it now sounds like "ten-thousand Chuck Berrys rocking the Grand Canyon". I've just tried to google for that review but couldn't find it anymore. --2003:71:4E16:4B74:71A3:7D52:C37D:2EF1 (talk) 01:14, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Where did this go?

Wasn't it here that I read that Paul did the opening scream because John would not have had enough time to catch his breath to start verse 1 properly? Where is that information now, other than in the message you are reading? Carlm0404 (talk) 18:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

This is, however, discussed in https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/954874-the-beatles-rock-band/51070223 Carlm0404 (talk) 19:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 2 April 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 17:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

---

Revolution (Beatles song) → Revolution (song) – Strong case of WP:PDABPRIMARY. This article has a ~8:1 pageview ratio with all ten other songs listed at Revolution (disambiguation) combined, none of which have reached even 330 views in the past 30 days. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 16:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose generally an ~8:1 ration is nowhere near enough for a PDAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

  WP:PDABLIST contains many examples of lower ratios than this:

  • Born This Way (album) with Born This Way (Cookie Crew album), Born This Way: The Remix and Born This Way: The Collection (4:1)
  • Portal (video game) with Portal (series) (2:1)
  • "Shattered" (song) with "Shattered (Turn the Car Around)" (2:1)
  • Sonic the Hedgehog (1991 video game) with Sonic the Hedgehog (8-bit video game) (6:1)
  • Southeastern (train operating company) with Southeastern (train operating company, 2006–2021) (3:1)

  JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 16:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

  Misleading. Of those examples, Born This Way and Portal are versus a derivative topic, "Shattered" is versus a topic with a subtitle, Sonic the Hedgehog is largely titled that way because of the dispute over whether to call it Sonic the Hedgehog (Sega Genesis game) or Sonic the Hedgehog (Mega Drive game) not because of a standard page-view analysis (and I suspect a RM proposing to move it to Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit video game) might well pass). That leaves only Southeastern, which is far from sufficient to prove your point. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

  I think we need to move those to, the consensus is clear that the threshold for PDABs is high. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose. Per my comments at Talk:Good Night (Beatles song), I think we need to pump the brakes on such discussions. 162 etc. (talk) 16:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose per Crouch, Swale. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose. Incomplete disambiguation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.