Talk:Patent Act (Canada)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Added history and purpose information to the page. More work can be done by adding to the notable cases, and other sections. I am not sure if all the citations on the history are required, I pulled most of it from one source. Perhaps that can be cleaned up at some future time. S3307a (talk) 05:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


The second reference for this article page is no longer valid and produces an error when brought up. Tradereddy (talk) 19:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)| (google search for Duy_CdnPatents_e.pdf itself can not be found). 04:02, 31 October 2011Reply

The third reference for this article is no longer valid | 04:02, 31 October 2011

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patent Act (Canada). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply