Talk:Pop (Slovenian TV channel)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.cetv-net.com/website.asp?article=14
  • In POP TV on Mon Jul 17 14:29:20 2006, 404 Not Found
  • In POP TV on Thu Jul 27 00:30:02 2006, 404 Not Found

---

maru (talk) contribs 04:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Replaced with updated link. Dl2000 22:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

File:POP LOGO.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:POP LOGO.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: zDeletion requests March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:POP LOGO.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Requested move 21 February 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Tone 13:35, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

---

POP TV → Pop TV – I understand this is a Swedish channel, but does "POP" stand for anything? 2601:8C:4500:1294:E9CD:6EA7:3E1F:88EE (talk) 22:36, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

It's not a Swedish channel but a Slovenian one. --В²C ☎ 00:32, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose. No reasonable basis provided for the proposed move (I reserve the right to change my mind if such is provided). --В²C ☎ 00:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC) changing !vote - see below --В²C ☎ 19:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
  • How about MOS:TM as a reasonable basis? —BarrelProof (talk) 00:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
    • Depends on how reliable sources most commonly refer to this topic. --В²C ☎ 00:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
    • At least this source uses all caps. --В²C ☎ 00:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
      • It is completely irrelevant whether some source can be found that uses the promotional styling. —BarrelProof (talk) 05:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
• Support per MOS:TM, unless reasonable evidence can be provided for POP being an acronym. Some sources that use the uncapitalised "Pop TV" : [1][2][3][4]. PC78 (talk) 10:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
• Support per MOS:TM / MOS:CAPS and PC78. The MOS doesn't say to look for what's most common in sources. The lead section of MOS:CAPS says "Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization." MOS:ALLCAPS says "Avoid writing with all caps (all capital letters) ... when they have only a stylistic function. Reduce them to title case, sentence case, or normal case, as appropriate." MOS:TMRULES says "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization practices, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official", as long as this is a style already in widespread use, rather than inventing a new one", and provides similar examples, saying to "avoid: TIME, KISS, ASUS, SONY Mobile". There is no mention in those of looking for what is most common in sources. Wikipedia has its own style guide – it does not try to follow popularity in sources in matters of styling. PC78 has identified several independent reliable sources that use the proposed styling, and that is sufficient. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
• Support per MOS:TM and usage examples from PC78. --В²C ☎ 19:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

• I really didn't expect that. If you had said it 45 minutes sooner, it would have saved me a long copy-paste rant. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

• Support per PC78. Well reasoned -- Whats new?^(talk) 02:55, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.