Talk:Nouveau roman
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jenks24 in topic Requested move 17 February 2017
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
"The nouveau roman style also left its mark on screen as writers..."
editShould this read:
"The nouveau roman style also left its mark on the screen as writers..?
I leave it up to someone involved with the creation of this page to decide.
MDMullins —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.123.184.113 (talk) 01:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Requested move 17 February 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 07:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Nouveau roman → Nouveau Roman – Roman should be capitalised. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 00:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 01:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: The 'R' would not normally be capitalized in French. Do we have evidence of capitalization from usage in English? EdJohnston (talk) 01:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose should not be capitalized. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose unless "Nouveau Roman" is capitalized in English sources. In French sources I could find, it seems to not be capitalized - for instance in the various editions of the book Pour un nouveau roman. There could be an argument that the page should be moved to New Roman, which seems to be the term in some English sources, but unless there are en sources using the fr words with en capitalization (which sounds unlikely) the hybrid should not be used. (Also, the various miscapitalizations in the article should be corrected as well.) TigraanClick here to contact me 16:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.