Talk:Maurice Cheeks
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge with Maurice Cheeks
editEliminate unnecessary redirect Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 01:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
The entry should be under Maurice - not Mo, but they should be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.64.189.105 (talk) 05:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I'm a bit confused with this proposed merge. According to WP:MERGE, a merger is a non-automated procedure by which the contents of two or more pages are united within a single page. In this case, Maurice Cheeks has absolutely no content to be merged here. — MT (talk) 15:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move It appears the original move to Mo Cheeks was on February 9, and the same editor requested it be moved back on February 10 at #Proposed merge with Maurice Cheeks. This seems non-controversial, but as a result of the recent move protection also on Feb 10, this is a technical request. In the future, technical requests can be requested at WP:RM/TR. —Bagumba (talk) 16:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Mo Cheeks → Maurice Cheeks – WP:COMMONNAME. Google search engine for "Maurice Cheeks": 519,000, for "Mo Cheeks": 124,000. Google News search for "Maurice Cheeks": 29,800, for "Mo Cheeks": 2,170. He is referred as Maurice Cheeks on major publications and basketball website such as in Sports Illustrated (past and present), ESPN, Reuters, NBA, Basketball-Reference, and many others. — MT (talk) 15:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support as per most common usage in reliable sources. Red Slash 16:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Maurice Cheeks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160109171623/http://www.nba.com/sixers/news/postgame_report_080404.html to http://www.nba.com/sixers/news/postgame_report_080404.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120710031411/http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2009/08/14/maurice-cheeks-coming-to-okc/ to http://blog.newsok.com/thunderrumblings/2009/08/14/maurice-cheeks-coming-to-okc/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)