Talk:Megatron (song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in hip-hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in hip-hop, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Women in hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Women in hip-hopWomen in hip-hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nicki Minaj (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nicki Minaj, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Nicki MinajWikipedia:WikiProject Nicki MinajTemplate:WikiProject Nicki MinajNicki Minaj

Semi-protected edit request on 3 July 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

rolling stone top 100 chart entry is #14 Saucenoappetizer (talk) 13:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Done Orville^talk 13:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Consensus on Remove Verifiability template

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Headline speaks for itself, anyone ele think there are enough verifiable citations on this article to get the Refimprove template removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MunRis (talk • contribs)

@Newslinger:, who originally tagged this. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the tag. When I added the {{refimprove}} tag, the song had not yet charted, and the existing references didn't provide significant coverage of the song. — Newslinger talk 02:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic