Talk:Mary Valley Rattler

Australia: Queensland / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Mary Valley Rattler is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Start‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Advertisement deletion

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Last month I removed the promotional tone from the article but it was then re-tagged as written like an advertisement. I would like to know which parts or words still are like an advert? As far as I can tell the article describes the course and covers some of its history. The railway line is currently only used for the tourist train. There are no other passenger or freight services on it. The article should not be deleted for the stated reasons so I am removing the prod. - Shiftchange (talk) 19:47, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bad article

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This is not a particularly well-written article, and is still somewhat written like an advertisment. This article should be re-written completley. -05/22/2010-MCAspire (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

So specifically what would you like changed or improved? What shouldn't be there and what is missing? - Shiftchange (talk) 07:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Right now, it doesn't sit well with me. It needs to be split up into sections. Right now, the single sections that covers everything is not at all Wikipedia standard. If I get the time, i'll fix it later, but right now i'm tied up in creating articles for the stations on the North Coast line (qld). -05/23/2010-MCAspire (talk) 02:48, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mary Valley Heritage Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822051231/http://www.assco.org.au/mvhr.htm to http://www.assco.org.au/mvhr.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mary Valley Rattler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic