Talk:MEL (magazine)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Request Update
editIt closed again - July 2022 sometime. Here's a source, don't know how great it is. But someone who's good at all this could maybe update this article again to put it in the past tense? Thanks! -- AIW https://observer.com/2022/07/mel-magazine-lays-off-its-staff-again/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.200.0.112 (talk) 18:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Request to Edit Source Quote
edit | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
The second sentence of the current page states as follows: Funded by Dollar Shave Club, New York Times journalist Amanda Hess described Mel as a "less serious publication for men that doesn't enforce male stereotypes".
The source does not contain that exact quote.
The source material states: “Mel is the rare men’s magazine that has taken upon itself to investigate masculinity, not enforce it.“
I’d like to request that an editor correct the content of the quote to reflect what the source said.
Pinging @JSFarman:, who was involved in the page at Articles for Creation. Alyssabcarroll (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Done. That's a no-brainer. Correcting an obviously incorrect quote is non-controversial and anyone can do it, COI or not. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
No adverts?
editEvery article is basically endless scroll of spammy adverts… 79.66.75.248 (talk) 04:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)