Talk:List of kings of Dál Riata

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Celts Low‑importance

	List of kings of Dál Riata is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country

Scottish Islands Mid‑importance

	Scottish islands portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Northern Ireland Mid‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medieval Scotland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medieval Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Medieval Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Medieval ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject Medieval ScotlandMedieval Scotland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

order of kings and earlier kings

Indeed, the order is reversed for "chronological order"; it should state "in reverse chronological order". What is the benefit with listing the last king first?

Also, this list begins with Fergus I (implying this is the list of kings for Scottish Daladria): what of the Legendary Kings of Irish Daladria?

See http://www.magma.ca/~mmackay/dalriada.html

-Liberty

Move to List of Kings of Dál Riata ?

Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Now that Dál Riata is the consensus, I would like to move this page to List of Kings of Dál Riata. I haven't checked on the category Kings of Dalriada, but presumably we'd want a new cat Kings of Dál Riata. It would be a lot of fiddling to change all the pages (especially those List of State Leader in Year X things - there must have been a technological solution to that !). It would be nice if we could agree on naming standards before moving anything, but I suppose that's harder work, and we'd want a consensus before doing that, so perhaps not. Regardless, I am not suggested we rename the individual kings from "of Dalriada" to "of Dál Riata". As for Ireland, I wish to follow an academically consensual route (few subjects could be less influenced by "popularity" than what to call Eochaid Buide). Unfortunately there's no equivalent of Byrne to hand for Scotland, so I have attempted to get the spelling of the genitives correct. Having already been corrected once, it's unlikely that this list is correct. Attention from Gaelic-speakers, and especially from experts in Old Irish, would be necessary to confirm the details.

If anyone objects to the move, please do see say so here, and we'll take the voting route (although I hope we can avoid that). I will put a note up on the Irish, Northern Irish and Scottish noticeboards. Angus McLellan 00:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

How to name Dál Riata kings

Please pick holes in my suggestions: bold are presently missing.

Even more mythical kings before Erc - list but no articles needed
Erc - no article needed ?

Always been suspicious about this guy; mainly because Erp seems to have been an important Pictish figure, and, of course, Erc is the P-Celtic equivalent.

Loarn - ditto unless it's a redirect to Cenél Loairn ?
Fergus I - Fergus Mór mac Eirc
Óengus Mór - no article unless a redirect to Cenél nÓengusa ?
Domangart I - Domangart mac Fergusa
Comgall - Comgall mac Domangairt
Gabhran - Gabrán mac Domangairt
Conall I - Conall mac Comgaill
Aedan - Áedán mac Gabráin

This guy is capable of an article of FA quality.

Eochaid I - Eochaid Buide mac Áeda
Connad - Connad Cear (or Cerr ?)
Domnall I - Domnall Brecc
Ferchar I - Ferchar mac (gen. Connad: Connaid ?)
Dunchad - Dúnchad mac Duban (?), putative great-grandson of Eochaid mac Gabráin.
Conall II - Connal Crandomna (Crannamna ?)
Domangart II - Domangart mac Domnaill
Maelduin - Máel-Duin mac Conaill
Domnall II - Domnall Donn
Ferchar II - Ferchar Fota
Eochaid II - Eochaid mac Domangairt (byname ? crooknose, to check)
Ainbcellach - Ainbcellach mac Ferchair
Fiannamail - Fiannamail ua Dunchada. Other nepotes Dunchado, Béc(c) (AU s.a. 707), Tuibride (AU s.a. 719) ?
Selbach - Selbach mac Ferchair
Dúnchad (m)Bec - not much of an article.
Dungal - Dúngal mac Selbaich
Eochaid III - Eochaid mac Echdach
Alpin I - Alpin mac Echdach
Muiredach - Muiredach mac Ainbcellaich
Eogan - Eógan mac Muiredaig (doubtful ?)
Aed - Áed Find
Fergus II - Fergus mac Echdach
Eochaid IV - Eochaid mac Áeda

And from now on things are doubtful, following Broun, "Pictish Kings".

Donncoirce - ?
Conall mac Taidg - under Picts
Conall mac Áeda - ditto ?
Domnall mac Caustantín
Áed mac Boanta

Interregnum ...

Gofraidh mac Fergusa, Caitill Find and eventually the Uí Imair.

Thoughts ? Angus McLellan 20:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Couple things:

Rather than create a new category, propose the existing category for renaming.
Regarding a "technological solution for all that," how about WP:AWB?

--Craig Stuntz 14:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Move

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Moved from List of Kings of Dalriada to List of Kings of Dál Riata. Seems obvious and uncontroversial, but please move it back, and we can debate the issue, if you have real objections. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Modern Scottish got it wrong

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If you read any recent books on early Scottish history, you'll find that many historians claim the records supporting the Dál Riata king-list end with Muiredach mac Ainbcellaig, citing the work of Marjorie O. Anderson. It seems, however, that historians frequently fail to verify their sources, especially thus historians prior to who lacked modern rigor. There is a list of Dal Riata king with reigns from 728 to 843, within the Scottish Latin Chronicles. Marjorie O. Anderson dismissed these, likely because they overlap with the Pictish kings who appear in the Scottish king-list. She then attempted to reposition these kings to match earlier rulers in the Synchronisms of Flann Mainstreach, ignoring inconsistencies in reign lengths when compared to the Duan Albanach and the mismatched patronymics. This approach resembles forcing a square peg into a round hole.

However, her theory falls apart upon realizing that the version of the Synchronisms of Flann Mainstreach she used, the one from Skene’s edition, was truncated. Her husband, Alan O. Anderson, published his own version in Early Sources of Scottish History, where he noted that one source was longer than Skene’s version. After reviewing the available manuscripts, it’s clear that all surviving versions are longer and include a second Alpin mac Eochaid prior to Cineath mac Alpin, who is recorded as having "took the kingship of Scone through battles."

Thus, there is no need for transposing the Cenél nGabráin kings. When left in place, as they appear in the Synchronisms and with the additional entries from the Latin Chronicle, they align perfectly. The only remaining kings missing from the Synchronisms are those belonging to Cenél Loairn. 2605:A601:A700:7C00:9CFA:A30B:1BE6:A5B1 (talk) 04:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic