Talk:Lacanianism
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Lacanian movement page were merged into Lacanianism on 26 May 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lacanianism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131213192019/http://www.fsom.org.au/Training.htm to http://www.fsom.org.au/Training.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140530162345/http://www.lacan.com/zizhowto.html to http://www.lacan.com/zizhowto.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
More Work
editThis wikipedia needs more work both stylistically and in terms of content. It does an injustice to the work of Jacques Lacan. I recommend not spacing out the quotations at the beginning of the wiki in the way that they are currently spaced out. --Hindiinindia (talk) 11:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
No photo?
editAre there no public domain images of him?
Can anyone translate this bullshit into English?
editI could copy and paste 50 paragraphs of garbage from the New Age Bullshit Generator and end up with a more comprehensible Wikipedia article than this. 98.234.13.133 (talk) 19:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)