Talk:Judge (2000 AD)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Judge (2000 AD) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 30 August 2023. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 28 August 2023. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Judge (2000 AD) was copied or moved into Mega-City One with this edit on 20 September 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Merge to Judge Dredd
editThere are generic topics about judges that do not concern Dred directly. Council of 5 springs to mind (Dred having never served). myork 13:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Don't merge this page. Other articles relating to subjects in Dredd's world link to this, to explain what "judge" means in that context. If they linked to Judge Dredd instead, readers would hbe faced with a massive article and would have to read/scroll down a lot to find out what a Mega-City judge actually is, by which time they would have lost patience with the original article they were on. It's better to keep this page. Richard75 00:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Don't merge.
1.The Dredd article would be too long if it included all the information about Judges in general.
2.The Judges don't exist only in Dredd stories.
3. Green Lantern Corps has a seperate article to The Green Lantern. Dredd is at least as significant to British comics as the Green Lantern is to American Comics. The Judges deserve their own article! --Iron Ghost 23:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Technically this should be voted on in the Judge Dredd article as the suggested merge is into that entry. While I'm here though I vote for keep it needs to be explained separately. (Emperor 11:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC))
Merge with Cadet Judge
editSomeone has suggested merging Cadet Judge into this article - I'm not against the article and will err on the side of caution and vote for keep but it does need expanding. (Emperor 11:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC))
I expanded it a little, but I'm not sure that there is an awful lot of more material to add. It seems to make more sense to move it here, as both articles deal with two aspects of essectially the same topic, and reading them is like reading one article split into two. I've merged them. Richard75 14:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Missing information!
editIf the Cadet Judges fail their assessments to become full judges over 90% of the time, what HAPPENS to the judges who fail? This is in no way clear nor is it an easy answer to find for the uninitiated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.89.94.250 (talk) 10:32, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Richard75 (talk) 10:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC)