Talk:Hu Ge
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editHalf of the info on this page is missing... -3 February '07
Requested moves
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 13:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
– This actor/singer gets more than 92% of the Hu Ge traffic and thus deserves to be the primary topic, since nobody else can claim long-term significance. I also strongly doubt the notability of the other 2 Hu Ge's, one an amateur director who makes low-budget parodies (sometimes with nothing more than a video-editing software), and another a so-called artist/director whose page reads more like a CV. Particularly suspicious is the latter Hu Ge despite 14 web references, as References 1-5 and 12 do not seem to contain his name anywhere and References 6-11 and 13-14 are dead links. No other language versions, could he even be a hoax? Timmyshin (talk) 08:14, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support - and AFD the second and speedy delete the third. In ictu oculi (talk)
- Support as proposed based on clear primacy of reader interest. bd2412 T 18:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.