Talk:History of Leeds United F.C.
Leeds United Honours was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 November 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into History of Leeds United F.C.. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Leeds United 1920-21.jpg
editImage:Leeds United 1920-21.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Requested move
edit- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was Move. 23:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Leeds United A.F.C. History → History of Leeds United A.F.C. — To follow the naming convention of other football club history articles in Category:History of football (soccer) by club —Jameboy (talk) 00:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Survey
edit- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support - seems fairly uncontroversial to me ChrisTheDude (talk) 00:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support – It makes sense and it conforms with every other football club history page Kaboooz LUFC T C 01:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support – all for standerdising on one format for the naming of these articles. Keith D (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support – I don't even know why this needed to come to WP:RM. The move makes perfect sense, and I can think of no reason why anyone, even the person who titled the article in the first place, would want to oppose this move. – PeeJay 13:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support - totally uncontroversial move, folllowing other football history articles. Peanut4 (talk) 22:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- You're right. I should have just moved it. Now done. --Jameboy (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Surely Farsley Celtic AFC would have something to say about that!. They are an association club and are based in Leeds. Chilkoot (talk) 17:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- It says "the only professional association football club in the city of Leeds" Are Farsley Celtic fully professional? I didn't think they were. --Jameboy (talk) 17:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out. I do believe they are non-proffessional at the moment. However, according to their wiki entry they do plan to go professional later this year. I've also heard rumours that they plan to change their name to FC Leeds but this has not being substantiated. Chilkoot (talk) 17:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Leeds United A.F.C. Reserves and Youth Team which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Leeds United F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070524165459/http://www.kpmg.co.uk/news/detail.cfm?pr=2873 to http://www.kpmg.co.uk/news/detail.cfm?pr=2873
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)