Talk:Garnish (cooking)

Untitled topic

Are garnishes supposed to be edible or not? Dysprosia 04:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Most chefs feel that a garnish must be intended to be eaten. Some do not. Those chefs suck. 206.11.112.251 18:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Tags

Yes, I know it's a short stub, but it's as bad as they come - unreferenced, original research, POV, with a poor tone.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 15:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Both edible and inedible ornaments to a central food item have been used, and called, garnishes. If we're adopting a neutral POV then it seems to me it's best to acknowledge the variations in usage rather than be prescriptive. 68.175.58.77 (talk) 20:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Charging same with no garnish

Is it legal to Charge the same for a dish with no (edible) garnish as with it. Say tomato or fried bread--Trammel (talk) 05:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)?

Yes, of course. Or at least I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't be, particularly in English law. sorsoup (talk) 23:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Gornisht?

Is there a source for the gornisht etymology? I have found no dictionary to corroborate this, and, in fact, the etymology given is from old French Garnir. 141.150.214.254 (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Photo caption mentions red pepper rings when they are tomatoes=

why does the photo caption mention the cheese is garnished with red pepper rings they are clearly cut cherry tomatoes with no red peppers in the photo at all — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.14.189 (talk) 10:58, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Cocktail garnish merge proposal

As it is written, I see absolutely no difference between a cocktail garnish and just any garnish although mixed drinks do seem to have a certain noticeable tendency towards garnishment.
Seeing as this is the case, I believe it may deserve to be merged into this page, however as it stands, the topic is not substantial enough to warrant a separate article on the matter; Its just confusing excess serving only to clutter up the disambiguation page garnish.
Also, cocktail garnish has no references. Repku (talk) 01:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

• Oppose Merge The cocktail garnish article incorporates not just food garnishes, but other kinds of (non-food) garnishes, as well, such as umbrellas and cocktail monkeys. The subject matter really doesn't fit here and is best kept as a separate article. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Garnish (food). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170422132246/https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=W64sCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA47 to https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=W64sCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA47

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Presen

Presentation of garnishing 122.54.34.195 (talk) 11:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Presentation garnishing

gar 122.54.34.195 (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Foam (culinary) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)