Talk:Garioch

Garioch is an area not a town. There is a collection of houses at a road junction called 'Chapel of Garioch' -- Anon

True enough. The Garioch is an area. Why did you think anyone would think otherwise ? -- Derek Ross | Talk 06:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Name

The proper name of the area is "The Garioch", not "Garioch". I don't intend to move it right now though, as there are an awful lot of links to fix. It is okay to use Garioch without the article when it is being used adjectivally or a part of a compound name like "He is a Garioch man" or "Chapel of Garioch" but when discussing the area itself, it should always be prefixed by "the". -- Derek Ross | Talk 06:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Further discussed on Template talk:Garioch, Aberdeenshire places, for anyone passing by. As noted there, Aberdeenshire Council's own website menu bars and titles invariably use "Garioch" as opposed to "The Garioch". Either is acceptable in everyday usage (q.v. Sudan, Lebanon, etc.) and no-one's raised an issue with this article being "Garioch" for the best part of two years. Thanks, David. Harami2000 23:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I should have read this discussion before moving this page to "Garioch". The formal name of the committee area is "Garioch", without the definite article, and I'm not aware of the definite article ever being included in official council documentation. The term "The Garioch" is often used in common parlance, but I think this is always in reference to the historical area, which is not the same as the current committee area, excluding Westhill, for example. --Deskford (talk) 18:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

So you should be. The article itself uses "the Garioch" more often than "Garioch". This move is a step backwards -- Derek Ross | Talk 21:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Expand

I feel it could to do with a broader treatment given its historical significance, but I'm not an expert on this, which is why I've tagged it. Rodhullandemu 01:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)