Talk:Frank Swift

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Frank Swift/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Overall the article is good, however I did find a few things:

• "...was a football goalkeeper who played for Manchester City and England, born in Blackpool, Lancashire." I don't really like how that's worded. Where he was born just feels awkwardly tacked on.
  • Reworded.
• "Swift's first club was Blackpool Gas Works, where he worked as a coke-keeper" What's a coke-keeper?
  • While none of the references go into detail, I'd expect it meant providing fuel for the furnaces. I've wikilinked coke (fuel), but given the lack of detail in the refs I probably can't do much else.
• "Len Langford had made over 100 appearances, but had received criticism for a poor performance in the 1933 FA Cup Final, which City had lost 3–0 to Everton." Things regarding criticism should probably be cited.
  • Irritatingly, I think the passage explicitly mentioning criticism is in the one Manchester City related book used for the article which I don't have on my bookshelf. I'll probably have access to said book at some point in the next two or three weeks. Descriptions of the 1933 final make it obvious that Langford had a terrible game, but those I have to hand do not explicitly mention criticism - a web-based one is [1] - "City keeper Len Langford almost punching into his own goal following a long ball from Cliff Britton", "A series of set-plays continued to cause havoc in the City penalty box with ‘Tosh’ Johnson making life difficult for his former team-mates by standing near Langford for corner-kicks and making runs to block his sight lines when the ball was played", "Jimmy Stein poked home a loose ball after Langford had dropped a Britton cross". I guess for now I'll remove the word "criticism" but leave the bit about having a poor performance.
• I'd like to see the club career split into subsections, if possible, just because there's a lot of paragraphs.
  • I've attempted to put it into two subsections, though I'm not too sure about it - it feels a bit like doing it for the sake of it.
• Doing a copyedit might help too; I found several small nitpicks as I read that I fixed, others might be around.
  • I've had a run-through, albeit subject to the blindness that comes when attempting to copyedit your own prose. Oldelpaso (talk) 08:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll put the article on hold for a few days so this stuff can be fixed. Wizardman 04:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Looks good now, I'll pass the article. Wizardman 16:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Langford criticism

I noticed the comments above about Langford and the 1933 final. Although there have been comments about Langford being criticised in various books over the years these do not match with the facts of what happened in 1933.

Langford was considered a very good 'keeper and Swift's chance to replace him did not have any relation to the 33 final.

The best and most recent book focusing on this period is "The Big Book Of City" By Gary James (ISBN 9780955812729). In that book there are profiles on all MCFC's goalkeepers and James says on page 73 in Langford's profile: "Everton won the game, but Langford was not faulted." He then goes on to talk about injury giving Swift his chance.

Hope this helps. BillyMeredithShorts (talk) 12:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Too much time has passed since I wrote that part for me to be sure where I got it from, and I neglected to cite it. I remember noticing that bit when I read The Big Book of City, but never followed it up. Normally I wouldn't dream of questioning Gary James, as his research is typically impeccable. However, looking up the report of the final in The Observer archives, it has the following passage (describing the opening goal):

"Langford rushed out too soon, the ball passed over him, and all he could do as he threw his hands up with a backward lean was to divert the ball to Stein, who from very short range just placed the ball in an unguarded net. The goalkeeper is the one man who is expected never to misjudge or make a mistake. This is what Langford did. The five minutes before the interval vanished before one could recover from the shock of such a goal; a goal that made one think of other blunders by goalkeepers in the Final ties of 1927 and 1928"

The Manchester Guardian said: "It would be unjust, perhaps, to saddle him with responsibility for Manchester's defeat, but he was at fault when Everton scored their first and second goals."

Of course, this may well be a matter for Langford's article rather than this one. Oldelpaso (talk) 22:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Frank swift.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Frank swift.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Swift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071026033052/http://sports.setanta.com/en/TV-and-Entertainment/The-XI-at-11/XI-at-11/XI-at-11-Englands-Best-Goalkeepers/ to http://sports.setanta.com/en/TV-and-Entertainment/The-XI-at-11/XI-at-11/XI-at-11-Englands-Best-Goalkeepers/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank Swift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514121859/http://www.englandfc.com/Profiles/php/PlayerProfileByName.php?id=951 to http://www.englandfc.com/Profiles/php/PlayerProfileByName.php?id=951

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 2 January 2018 (UTC)