Talk:Texano Jr./GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  15:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "is a Mexican luchador, or professional wrestler" - translation should typically be in brackets, but feel free to ignore

   "who would later be known under the ring name Súper Nova" - what about Bengala?

   I've split a paragraph from the Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre (2003–2011) section, if that's OK

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Are you sure all of his signature moves can be sourced? (In ref 1?)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

The prose is well written and the article is comprehensive, so I found no faults there. I wasn't sure if his signature moves were sourced (I couldn't access it), but I don't see how it would hinder the review, so I'll pass it outright. JAGUAR  19:01, 30 October 2016 (UTC)