Talk:Eifel rule

Merge?

This article is virtually the same as Luxembourgish language#Eifeler Regel and could be merged into that section. --85.93.208.176 (talk) 12:48, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

For the moment there is nothing to merge. Purodha apparently planned to add information about Kölsch, but lost steam shortly after creating this article. In principle it's not a bad idea to have a separate article about the Eifel Rule. But it is a bad idea to have the same text about Luxemburgish in two different articles, so I will delete it from this article and add a section link. CapnPrep (talk) 19:25, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I agree. I would NOT merge the two but would refer in Luxembourgish to the main article. The rule does not only exist in Moselle Frankish or in Ripuarian Frankish (such as Kölsch) but in most of the non-colonial varieties of the the German dialects West of the Elbe-Saale line (such as Alemannic). Eklir (talk) 01:59, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm undoing the merge because it's done in the bad direction. The rule is a German dialect rule which occurs also in Luxembourgish. The subsection in Luxembourgish now redirects to the main article here. Eklir (talk) 21:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

I transferred the section about the rule in Luxembourgish, added the Colognian project of Purodha as another section, added a section on Alemannic and completed some sourcing. Since I have to tend to some other business, I'd be grateful if somebody could help with some wikifying, Eklir (talk) 00:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Limburgish and other dialects of the Netherlands

A similar rule also occurs in Limburgish and other areas of the Netherlands (called the bdht-rule), while in many others final -n is deleted altogether (common in standard Dutch too). Are these two things connected? Given that there's a dialect continuum, it seems likely. CodeCat (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eifeler Regel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100904045416/http://www.cpll.lu/ortholuxs_l.html to http://www.cpll.lu/ortholuxs_l.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC)