Talk:Derryn Hinch/Archives/2013
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Factual errors
During today's Drive Program, Derryn did a segment on Wikipedia, specifically with regard to the recent Essjay fiasco. Derryn said he wasn't concerned with criticism in the article (although from our point-of-view, we shouldn't have any unsourced editorial comment) but he noted that this biography contains some factual errors. So I think we need to go through and carefully look at sourcing each factual claim and removing anything we can't source, per BLP. Sarah 11:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Hinchbook.jpg
Image:Hinchbook.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Martinek affair
Just read this in the news: "Radio broadcaster Derryn Hinch has described his relief outside the Supreme Court after former business partner Mary-Ann Martinek apologised for accusing him of sexual assault.
In a letter read in court today by Hinch's barrister, Ms Martinek, a former Army major, apologised unreservedly for allegations made against Hinch in letters and emails, including that he sexually assaulted her."
http://www.theage.com.au/national/hinch-relieved-after-sex-assault-apology-20080627-2xsh.html
Strange not to find anything about this in the article. Or did I overlook it?