Talk:Davy and Kristin McGuire
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
COI
editConnection seems pretty obvious; in addition to the evidence of edits, see image description, with claim of "own" work and attribution to Davy and Kristin McGuire. This article needs to be checked over by somebody who is not involved to ensure that it is neutral, complies with verifiability policies and does not contain original research. Speaking of original research, much of the content in this article about the biographies of Davy and Kristin McGuire is unsourced, which is a problem under our biographies of living persons policy. While citations are particularly important for negative material, they are needed for positive material as well. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Agreed, this feels like COI. Almost all of edits are from two accounts only used to edit this article. Dgpop (talk) 17:10, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
- Alchimie de Courvoisier.jpg (discussion)
- Davy and Kristin McGuire.jpg (discussion)
- Jam Jar Fairy .jpg (discussion)
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 21:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Excessively detailed
editThis article seems to be far too detailed with a long list of a large number of art projects. This gives it an advert feel. Although there are many references (which is good), the article is not very encyclopedic due to its excessive detail and list-like presentation. There are also very few links to this article, which makes me wonder about notability, but I'll leave that for now. I'll try and reduce the detail.Seaweed (talk) 15:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)