Talk:Danny Blanchflower

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Biography of Danny Blanchflower

edit

I added Reference

  • David Bowler (1997). Danny Blanchflower: The Biography of a Visionary. Orion. ISBN 0-575-06504-4.

Someone should incorporate information from this book into this article.--User:Brenont (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hatnote to David Blanchflower

edit

I'd put this in the article, but sourcing a hatnote seems excessive. The economist David Blanchflower is commonly known as "Danny" as noted by this blog, this bio, this article and this bio. Pfainuk talk 11:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's fine, but someone else will likely come along and remove it for the same reason I did. A better explanation in the hatnote is necessary. - Dudesleeper / Talk 01:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've added the nickname to the David Blanchflower article, and pointed out that this is his nickname in the note itself. Pfainuk talk 10:20, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have just deleted the David Blanchflower hatnote, prior to reading this thread. I checked the David Blanchflower article first though and could see no mention in that of him being referred to as 'Danny', and thus the note added by Pfainuk above is no longer there. It perhaps reinforces why the hatnote was not needed. Eldumpo (talk) 22:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
David Blanchflower states in the first line that he's sometimes referred to as 'Danny', with sources. I've restored the hatnote. Robofish (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Danny Blanchflower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Danny Blanchflower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply