Talk:DFI Retail Group

Untitled

The company's small icon has been deleted. I am wondering should we add them again. I think it is a good idea to contain such kind of small logos which can give a clear mind to the reader which company is talking about.

Would it be possible to update the Dairy Farm Holdings Limited logo to the most updated version as shown in this previous wikipedia page version https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Dairy_Farm_International_Holdings&oldid=1042896509 OR their website https://www.dairyfarmgroup.com/en-US

JFergusonDFI (talk) 08:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Career oppurtunities/shareholder?? neutrality?

I checked this article a while back and got some good information. It wasn't a full or complete article, but what i read was factual and unbiased.

But from what i've seen of other company profiles don't think its quite appropriate to put in career oppurtunities... not exactly as relevant information to Diary Farm, looks just like either advertisement or job recruitment.

and shareholder information? not many other ones on wikipedia have such, have moved it down, but actually would prefer to delete this too as, to me, its like... oo invest here!

Neither seems very neutral..

Also, please sign your comments. Knowsitallnot 04:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Neutral - wordings

I would suggest removal of emmotive words such as reffering to the company as "she". But generally the article is fine. Some of the tenses are incorrect.

But it was both interesting and useful

Fair use rationale for Image:Dairy Farm Logo.jpg

Image:Dairy Farm Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 16:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 27 July 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 07:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

---

Dairy Farm International Holdings → Dairy Farm – If "Dairy Farm" is to redirect here anyway, this article may as well be moved there per WP:COMMONNAME. Note that dairy farm redirects to dairy farming. feminist 03:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose This would add to confusion rather than making things clearer. With the present title of the two articles, each is clearer and it's obvious if you've wound up in the wrong place. Given the current title is perfectly accurate I see no need or advantage to the move. Landscape repton (talk) 12:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - If it ain't broke, don't fix it. - STSC (talk) 08:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

History - good source

See this good article from Zolima for more on the company's history: Hong Kong’s Industrial History, Part VII: The Rise and Fall of Local Milk. Onanoff (talk) 07:32, 18 July 2019 (UTC)