Talk:Conservative Party of British Columbia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Conservative Party of British Columbia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph of Trevor Bolin be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
To party members who may wish to edit the article: please see WP:COI regarding conflict-of-interest concerning members of organizations editing articles about those organizations. I'm not saying this has happened here; this is a general comment/warning being placed on all BC political party pages because of problems with certain party articles and related pages....Skookum1 01:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Bccp-logo.gif
editImage:Bccp-logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on British Columbia Conservative Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://bcconservative.ca/2010/04/bc-conservatives-appoint-former-commons-house-leader-to-chair-political-strategy/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on British Columbia Conservative Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120930032113/http://www.abbotsfordtimes.com:80/news/Independence+Dongen/7286917/story.html to http://www.abbotsfordtimes.com/news/Independence+Dongen/7286917/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on British Columbia Conservative Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812065653/http://bcconservative.ca/2010/09/former-premier-brian-peckford-joins-conservative-advisors/ to http://bcconservative.ca/2010/09/former-premier-brian-peckford-joins-conservative-advisors/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812065658/http://bcconservative.ca/2010/09/former-premier-rita-johnston-joins-conservative-advisors/ to http://bcconservative.ca/2010/09/former-premier-rita-johnston-joins-conservative-advisors/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812065729/http://bcconservative.ca/2010/09/international-governance-and-democracy-expert-joins-bc-conservative-advisors/ to http://bcconservative.ca/2010/09/international-governance-and-democracy-expert-joins-bc-conservative-advisors/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812065831/http://bcconservative.ca/2010/09/mp-cummins-joins-bc-conservative-advisory-group/ to http://bcconservative.ca/2010/09/mp-cummins-joins-bc-conservative-advisory-group/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abbotsfordtimes.com/news/Independence%2BDongen/7286917/story.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.llbc.leg.bc.ca/public/reference/partyleaders.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
This article is confusingly written
editUnder the heading "Founding and early years", the first sentence is
The BC Conservatives, known colloquially as the Tories, were formed in 1900 when the Liberal-Conservative Party selected its first provincial leader, Charles Wilson.
There are three different party names mentioned ("BC Conservatives", "Tories", and "Liberal-Conservative Party"), but not the party name that is the title of this article ("Conservative Party of British Columbia"). This is totally unclear. The first 12 words of the sentence suggest that a party called "BC Conservatives" was formed in 1900, and at that time it was also called "the Tories". But then the sentence mentions the "Liberal-Conservative Party". Is it saying that this was a third name for the same party? Or is it saying that somehow the "BC Conservatives" were formed in 1900 to oppose the Liberal-Conservative Party's new leader? Mathew5000 (talk) 01:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
"Far Right" description in infobox and prose
editAny statements referring to the post-2023 version of this party as far right have been reverted a few times now. I'm not saying that's the entire party but clearly it has a presence in the membership, candidates and board. Look at the definition of Far Right in use on Wikipedia: "Contemporary definitions now include neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, the Third Position, the alt-right, racial supremacism and other ideologies or organizations that feature aspects of authoritarian, ultra-nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, theocratic, racist, homophobic, transphobic, or reactionary views" This is not a Nazi party, but it contains elements on that list including affiliation with the alt-right and transphobia. Dan Carkner (talk) 21:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Do we have any sources that claim this for party position? I see why it was removed the current source does not say this. Give it a few days see if we get sources if not we can just remove it again. Moxy🍁 22:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- We have plenty of sources that actually state that the party is on the centre-right, right, and are targeted towards voters with those beliefs.
- Here's the CBC[1] mentioning a "growing debate in B.C. over who stands for the right side on the political spectrum". Here's another CBC article which quotes a political science professor, Hamish Telford:
- "If they don't gain more traction and become the dominant centre-right party or right party, they could end up just splitting the vote down the middle with B.C. United, handing an easy victory to the NDP," said Telford of the Conservatives.[2]
- Another source:[3]
- "As the federal Conservatives rise in popularity in the province, both Rustad and BC United leader Kevin Falcon are jockeying for right-of-centre support"
- The definition of far-right on Wikipedia and your personal opinion of whether the party fits the criteria cannot justify an edit like this.
- Deathying (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC) Deathying (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-conservative-party-banman-jump-united-1.6966211
- ^ https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-united-on-shaky-ground-as-bc-conservatives-rise-1.7047260
- ^ https://www.richmond-news.com/highlights/bc-conservative-party-draws-support-from-pierre-poilievre-supporters-poll-shows-8536639
The Tyee
editA user has been removing citations from The Tyee from this article saying it's not a reliable news organization and comparing it to Rebel Media. I don't think that's a fair comparison, The Tyee has won a number of awards for their reporting this year alone. They're listed on the wiki page itself: The_Tyee#Awards. No one has to agree with the tone of their coverage, but given the anemic journalism sector in BC, excluding them entirely seems counterproductive. Dan Carkner (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)