Talk:Conjoint analysis
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Conjoint analysis (healthcare) page were merged into Conjoint analysis on 15 May 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the Conjoint analysis (marketing) page were merged into Conjoint analysis on 15 May 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merge suggestion
editMaybe this article should be added to conjoint analysis (in marketing).An article entitled conjoint analysis would be more mathematical and less application specific. mydogategodshat 19:47, 14 Aug 2003 (UTC)
1. In the Ivy League example focus groups are a qualitative method of gathering feedback. Conjoint analysis is a quantitative technique requiring formal structured sampling methods and an appropriate base size.
2. It describes the use of a card sort exercise, which is just one form of conjoint analysis (Full Profile). Some discussion of choice-based conjoint and discrete choice modelling is also merited
3. This overlaps so strongly with the conjoint analysis (marketing) that they should be combined
Where's the math?
editI agree, reading this article gives you no idea of how to actually do one. 78.149.121.22 (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Unintelligible
editNo idea what this article is talking about. The basic concepts are not defined. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.226.185.110 (talk) 00:18, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. This article needs to be updated with an actual explaination of conjoint analysis. Also, i was looking for the types of conjoint analysis and here it never mentions there are different ways —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.63.96.96 (talk) 18:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editI propose that Conjoint analysis (marketing) and Conjoint analysis (healthcare) be merged into Conjoint analysis. I think that the content in the these two articles can easily be explained in main page, there is duplicate content, and the merging of these articles will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Happybunny95 (talk) 08:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
No objections were received within 30 days. Also, following on from User:mydogategodshat's comment from 2003, proceeding with merger. Happybunny95 (talk) 00:03, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Self-promotion on the Wiki article
editSeems like there is a bit of self-promotion of Conjoint.ly. The user posted two images that link to the website, doesn't add much value for the reader. Pls, review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.13.6 (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- The images were added because it was not possible to understand what a survey and outputs look like, not for promotion of anyone.Happybunny95 (talk) 13:40, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Market or Marketing research
editIsn't Conjoint Analysis more often associated with Marketing research than to Market research? If so, I'd change the text and category accordingly. Solstag (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 201 - Thu
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ISHIKAWAYI (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by ISHIKAWAYI (talk) 16:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)