Talk:Christine Nesbitt

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

Australia: Sports Low‑importance

	Australia portal Christine Nesbitt is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Olympics Mid‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Speed Skating High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Speed Skating, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of speed skating-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Speed SkatingWikipedia:WikiProject Speed SkatingTemplate:WikiProject Speed SkatingSpeed skating articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Sport Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Women's sport

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Christine Nesbitt

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

(I've moved your concerns here, Also please see Ownership issues. Creating a page and editing it for 4 years is not an excuse for creating an article with zero inline citations. As I mention in my reply this entire article is suitable for deletion. As well please sign all of your posts with four (~~~~))Krazytea (talk) 05:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've reverted one of your many edits of Christine Nesbitt's wikipedia page. You make your changes with no consultation and then suggest that anyone with concerns raise them in the discussion section.

Why do you think you can make the changes without raising concerns first? There are at least two people, myself included, who have been monitoring, updating and building this page since I created it four years ago. Maintaining a World Cup medal tally is not cluttering up the page as you claim, and it is also providing valuable information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djn81 (talk • contribs) 04:46, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Here's what I posted in a discussion page elsewhere. Please see other WP:GA rate BLPs such as Apolo Anton Ohno, Dwain Chambers, Tyson Gay. The results section if added should be reserved for essential honours only as it is with Chambers, and Gay. In the case of Ohno if we were to add World Cup victories you would have a list of near 50 victories that would rival the length of the article itself. Please see WikiProject Olympics GA articles on how to properly enter a wikipedia page. You've spent two years creating a terrible article. As Ohno is also a speed skater (albeit in long-track), this is an excellent barometer on how to enter a Speed Skater Wikipedia page.

When it comes to the medal record it should be reserved for essential and important medal records and according to their distinction.

1. Olympics

2. World Championships

3. Other (if any)

4. World Junior (or international junior level competition)

As far as the article please see Good article criteria this article only meets 2 out of the 6 requirements in that it is broad and stable. It doesn't have many pictures (which isn't important and you've done well to get the one there), it's not very neutral, is not terribly well written, but more importantly it lacks any inline citations. If the second phase on the BLPs passes this entire article is suitable for deletion within 7 days. Please see BLPs Phase II The inline citations are terribly important here and need to be improved drastically. Finally there are far too many external links here, the links should be reserved for any links to Nesbitt's team profiles, ISU profiles, personal websites, and again only priority sites. Linking every image and every YouTube video available is non-essential this is not a fan site, this is an encyclopedia and thus this article should follow all BLP criteria and base it on GA ratings. Again this article is suitable for deletion

Krazytea (talk) 22:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

When I first saw this page, I immediately thought that it looked not unlike a vanity page, or at least something you would see in a "career highlights" page at a personal or promotional website. Now, to be clear, I don't think it's a vanity page, it's just very detailed on the results, perhaps unnecessarily so, and has no sources. It also tends to be somewhat POV. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 22:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Observations on the new presentation

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Well, now that this page has been subjected to one person's interpretation of wikipedia's guidelines, this entry is entirely unreadable as opposed to its original format which allowed the reader to quickly reference the three major speed skating competitions (world cups, world championships, olympics) without wading through a poorly organized, poorly presented "history". It seems we've replaced the concept of an encyclopedia entry with that of a miserable high school history paper.

Yet, somehow links to videos of races (which might interest users given their historical significance, no?) and detailed summaries of racing results are eliminated. Length in unreadable prose is approved, yet length for detailed results and links to videos is not. I wonder how that seems to accomplish the goal of informing readers, of becoming an easily readable, highly informative encyclopedia entry. Quite the opposite of vanity, a word "Scorpion" is clearly having trouble grasping.

Yes, I spent two years creating a "terrible article" which no one complained about until it was replaced within days of Nesbitt's gold medal by a self-appointed editor with an even shittier one; stylistically and in regards to information. Congratulations on following the wikipedia guidelines, "Krazytea." You're another fine example of independent thought and creativity in action.

What a bloody mess!--Doug Nesbitt (talk) 16:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Christine Nesbitt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christine Nesbitt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717142225/http://www.speedskating.ca/Rising_star.cfm to http://www.speedskating.ca/Rising_star.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic