Talk:Chicken as food
(Redirected from Talk:Chicken (food))
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Skynxnex in topic Requested move 5 February 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chicken as food article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was selected as the article for improvement on 10 July 2017 for a period of one week. |
 | On 5 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Chicken in Culinary Practices. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 5 February 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Clear consensus to stay with current title based largely on WP:CONSISTENT. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Chicken as food → Chicken in Culinary Practices – a more specific and engaging title could enhance the article's appeal and accessibility to readers 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 02:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Chicken as food → Chicken in Culinary Practices - The current title "Chicken as food" lacks specificity regarding its focus on human consumption. By including "Chicken in Culinary Practices" in the proposed title, we highlight the article's main focus on the role of chicken in human cuisine. This change aims to better inform readers about the content they can expect to find in the article, making it more accessible and appealing to those interested in culinary topics and everyone in general. Thanks. 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 01:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, as this name format is not used in any other similar articles listed in Category:Meat or subcategories. Also I would like to note that even if consensus to move per nominator's reasoning is found, the new name should be Chicken in culinary practices per Wikipedia's capitalization policy. Bensci54 (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Well if that's the case I can agree to change the new name to "Chicken in culinary practices". Additionally, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 02:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. We have dozens of "as food" articles: Fish as food, Snails as food, Eggs as food, ... and no "...in culinary practices" articles. Why should chicken be any different? --Macrakis (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Other articles may look different, that's the nature of Wikipedia. Fish as food could possibly be improved, but that's not particularly relevant to this discussion. 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 02:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Violates various policies such as WP:CONSISTENT and MOS:CAPS. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose much less clear. SportingFlyer T·C 22:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
How is it less clear is my question 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 02:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. I don't understand what distinction the proposal is meant to draw between "food" and "culinary practices", but it's not necessary for a descriptive title to try so hard to be technically correct. We don't have to specify that it's "human" food; a primary focus on humans can just be implied, like Sleep and Sleep in animals for example. "Food" is plain language. Adumbrativus (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:SOCKSTRIKE — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 19:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.