Talk:Bruce, Minnesota
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bruce, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402141127/http://www.postalhistory.com/postoffices.asp?task=display&state=MN&county=Rock to http://www.postalhistory.com/postoffices.asp?task=display&state=MN&county=Rock
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry. This has been replaced by a public domain USDA image from 1936. All USDA images are in the public domain. Ray Lowry 18:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Comment of article having too many pictures, charts or diagrams for its overall length. (April 2022)
editSorry, but Bruce is beyond being a ghost town. Not one fence post of the community remains. What once was a town representing the hopes and dreams of many settlers, is now literally a farmer's corn field. These few images are all that remain. Let Bruce have its due. User:Ray.lowry
- That doesn't justify putting lots of images on the article and crowding the text. It's better to just put the images into a category on Commons. Jurta talk 08:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- No, because then people interested in learning about the vanished town of Bruce, Minnesota - let's say students students in Rock County researching their local history and geography, will never be able to find them. The photos help tell the story, and the only place the full story of Bruce exists on the internet is on Wikipedia. Ray Lowry 14:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- I advise reading MOS:SANDWICH, MOS:TEXTASIMAGES and WP:GALLERY. Jurta talk 20:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- No, because then people interested in learning about the vanished town of Bruce, Minnesota - let's say students students in Rock County researching their local history and geography, will never be able to find them. The photos help tell the story, and the only place the full story of Bruce exists on the internet is on Wikipedia. Ray Lowry 14:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)