Talk:Barnston Island

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Untitled

edit

I fail to see how this is of "mid" importance, though I do not doubt it should be on the wikipedia, especially for the British Columbia portal a mid importance article would seem to be one that is more notable than this island. Anmore for example is rated as low yet has more population, could anyone explain the reasoning of this to me? TotallyTempo 15:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

All depends on who does the rating and what kind of mood they're in. bobanny 15:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Removed redlink to IR, as per Category talk:First Nations reserves in British Columbia.--Keefer4 04:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Shoe house

edit

I don't know if it's still there, but does anyone remember there being a house in the shape of a giant shoe somewhere on the island? I know I recall seeing it while exploring the island one night.. couldn't have been just an acid trip.. it was quite surreal, looked just like the one from the nursery rhyme actually, There was an Old Woman Who Lived in a Shoe, and was big enough to support someone living in there. I'm not making this up. -- œ 23:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

And it wasn't the pump house. -- œ 04:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

"could have just been an acid trip"...yep...blame canada...blame canada...blame canada.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.253.16 (talk) 07:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barnston Island (British Columbia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply