This article was nominated for deletion on 6 February 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hoax
editDear Sirs and madames,
Pleased be informed that my article is sourced in reputed journals and is not 'a hoax'. It is my own discovery. On what basis can you impute this kind of allegation? My suggestion is that you fread the relevant cited literature before making accusations, about "a hoax" as you indelicately put it. Can you just make any unfounded acusations?
Respectfully, Azd0815 (talk) 16:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
- The sources you are adding are called WP:REFSPAM or WP:SELFPUBLISH. if you have no other sources I will nominate for deletion. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Since the problem has been solved, can the warning to the reader not be removed? Domdeparis acknowledged that he would agree to do so, if new evidence could be brought to bear. Azd0815 (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)