Talk:Adult diaper

Latest comment: 23 days ago by DANIELJMARTINEZ in topic "Underwear within underwear"

"Underwear within underwear"

edit

Adult diapers are also called "underwear within underwear". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.64.47.168 (talk) 02:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

@181.64.47.168 I agree you DANIELJMARTINEZ (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't this be merged into diaper? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.60.232.56 (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

@195.60.232.56 yes it should DANIELJMARTINEZ (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Adult diaper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adult diaper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adult diaper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2021

edit

There is a difference between Adult Pull-Ups and Adult Diapers. A relevant link to explain this difference is a very valid one and is missing on this page. Here is a link that explains it: https://www.carewell.com/resources/blog/products/adult-pull-ups-vs-diapers/ Conradcare (talk) 22:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Seagull123 Φ 23:10, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Seann Odoms is wrongly implied to work for Men's Health

edit

Seann Odoms nvr wrote any articles as an employee of Men's Health Magazine or anything related to them. He wrote a reader submitted article which appears to have been published according to these links, but its actually a link to the MensHealth.about.com website which has since changed to be redirected to two other links (i have no idea if this link is truly connected to Mens Health in any way but it does not appear to be)

http://socalab.250x.com/d4health.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20160120114427/http://menshealth.about.com/cs/fromyou/a/wear_nappies.htm (this is a snapshot of the article linked at the bottom of the other page, from Jan 20 2016; after that the link begins to redirect to other sites articles on incontinence, first a surgery.about.com link and then a verywellhealth.com link)

Not sure if that part shud be removed entirely, but it shud at least be edited to reflect that it was a reader submitted article instd of implying employment as it currently does. Shardok (talk) 01:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply