Talk:Adjutant general

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Seniority in the UK

edit

I would dispute the statement that the AG is second only to the CGS in the British Army. That position must surely belong to the Commander-in-Chief Land Command, who, like the CGS, is a full general: the AG is only a lieutenant general. Franey 14:50, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Things have apparently changed recently (not for the better, sadly), but the AG certainly was the second most senior officer and was always a full general. But then, so was the QMG. -- Necrothesp 15:06, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
edit

I just removed the entire section labeled as "Heraldry" in that it was blatant cut and paste from this website. The user who posted this material has been warned about cutting and pasting entire sections from other sites. -Husnock 05:53, 11 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Adjutant General/Adjutant general

edit

Why is the article name "Adjutant general" when throughout the article it refers to "Adjutant General"? Zarboki 06:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

In the Society of Jesus?

edit

I have removed the reference to the Jesuits (or 'Society of Jesus') as it was erroneous. Those in charge of advising the Superior General are called 'Assistants' and not 'Adjudants'. Zerged (talk) 22:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Adjutant General Branch

edit

In the U.S. Army all personnel that carry jobs that deal with Personnel Records or Records Keeping fall under the AG Branch. Starting at the Battalion Headquarters every level of command has its own Adjutant, who is otherwise known as the S-1, or the G-1 at the higher levels of Command. Every Adjutant has his or her own cabinet of AG soldiers and NCO's (Non-Commisioned Officers). Also, in most cases the CSM (Command Sergeant Major) also falls under the S1 Section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.192.187 (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adjutant general. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adjutant general. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply