Talk:55th (West Lancashire) Division

55th (West Lancashire) Division has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 29, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
February 22, 2021	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

Current status: Good article

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: British / European / World War I A‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

A

This article has been rated as A-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 20 October 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Split

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@EnigmaMcmxc: Good idea to split such a big article. Did a quick auto ed, cite scan and post-furlough drive-by references check. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

It did get suggested a while back, but I was a little stubborn and thought I could cut it down enough. Finally had to bite the bullet!EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 13:08, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic