Talk:2167/2168 Changchun–Mudanjiang through train

Requested move 19 September 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) jlwoodwa (talk) 23:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


– These are descriptive titles, not proper names, so lowercase "through train". And dash between names of termini. Dicklyon (talk) 23:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

No objection, but frankly the few I've spot-checked are all good deletion candidates. Mackensen (talk) 11:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
True. Dicklyon (talk) 00:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I won't complicate things by starting a deletion request in the middle of a page move discussion. Mackensen (talk) 11:16, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I would disagree with deleting these outright. Unless there is already an article encompassing the whole of this information, I would consider these candidates to merge into a single article on through train routes of China. BD2412 T 02:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Does such an article even exist? China is a massive country and one article listing every single train route in the country would likely be extremely long. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The "through trains" are pretty special, few in number, I think. I think these could be collected into a sensible article. Dicklyon (talk) 04:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'd support deleting most or all of these as well. No objection to the move request as it is unambiguous. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.