Talk:15th century

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Viriditas in topic Lead needs to be rewritten

Old talk

edit

Right now, we have two pages for every century: the overview (16th century) and the Year in Review (Year in Review 16th Century). This has the effect that these pages have to crosslink in an awkward manner, and that every year page (1642) has to link to two different pages for the same century.

I propose that we merge the two pages for every century by simply adding the table of decades and years to the overview page, like I did here for the 15th century. Eventually, we could completely get rid of the Year in Review pages (the title is not very descriptive and trademarked). This would simplify Centuries as well as all individual year pages.

Comments?

AxelBoldt, Saturday, June 29, 2002

I think that's a great idea. --LC, Saturday, June 29, 2002

Commonwealth?

edit

Which commonwealth? JackyR 00:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lead needs to be rewritten

edit

It repeats information about Columbus twice. Viriditas (talk) 20:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply