Talk:HD 17943
(Redirected from Talk:Σ Eridani)
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Lightoil in topic Requested move 6 January 2024
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | On 6 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Σ Eridani to HD 17943. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 6 January 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 05:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Σ Eridani → HD 17943 – This isn't the standard title format for Bayer designations (should be "Sigma Eridani"), but in any case a quick search finds this (full text) which says that Sigma Eridani is not a correct designation for this star, and in fact doesn't exist. This designation doesn't appear in SIMBAD, either. SevenSpheres (talk) 20:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, this Bayer designation has never been used, and it also does not appear in software for viewing the sky, such as Stellarium. In the Table of stars with Bayer designations the designation Sigma Eridani is also empty. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 23:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- That was from List of stars in Eridanus, even referenced. 1.36.119.220 (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- And the article I linked above says that reference is incorrect. SevenSpheres (talk) 00:04, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- That was from List of stars in Eridanus, even referenced. 1.36.119.220 (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Astronomy has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Move to Sigma Eridani, in accordance with other stars with Bayer designations. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 18:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.