Wikipedia

Spinal precautions

Spinal precautions, also known as spinal immobilization and spinal motion restriction, are efforts to prevent movement of the bones of the spine in those with a risk of a spine injury.[1] This is done as an effort to prevent injury to the spinal cord[1] in unstable spinal fractures.[2] About 0.5-3% of people with blunt trauma will have a spine injury,[3][4] with 42-50% of injuries due to motor vehicle accidents, 27-43% from falls or work injuries, and the rest due to sports injuries (9%) or assault (11%).[4][5][6] The majority of spinal cord injuries are to the cervical spine (neck, 52%), followed by the thoracic (upper back) and lumbar (lower back) spine.[4] Cervical spinal cord injuries can result in tetraplegia or paraplegia, depending on severity.[6] Of spine injuries, only 0.01%[7] are unstable and require intervention (either surgery or a spinal orthosis).[8]

Spinal precautions
A person with a hard cervical collar on a long board

Some authors argue that use of spinal precautions is controversial because benefit is unclear and there are significant drawbacks including pressure ulcers, increased pain, and delayed transport times.[9][7][10] Spinal boards can also be uncomfortable.[11]

Indications

edit

Spinal precautions are first initiated by emergency medical services in the prehospital setting.[9] There are multiple decision rules used by different EMS departments to determine which patients should be immobilized.[3][4][7]

Due to concerns of side effects the National Association of EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons recommend its use only in those at high risk.[7] This includes: those with blunt trauma who have a decreased level of consciousness, pain or tenderness in the spine, those with numbness or weakness believed to be due to a spinal injury, and those with a significant trauma mechanism that are intoxicated or have other major injuries.[7] These recommendations are also endorsed by the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine.[12] Immobilization is also recommended in those with a definite spinal cord injury.[13]

Spinal motion stabilization is not supported for penetrating trauma to the back including that caused by gun shot wounds.[9][14]

Prehospital

edit

Methods

edit

Spinal precautions generally include long spine boards, cervical collars, head blocks, and straps with the goal of immobilizing or reducing movement throughout the entirety of the spine.[4][7][12] They also include methods to reduce spinal movement while moving a patient, such as logrolling.[7] Measures to reduce intracranial pressure, such as lowering the feet of the bed while keeping it flat, are also sometimes used.[7]

If a longboard is used, cushioning it is useful to decrease discomfort due to pressure.[15] A vacuum mattress and scoop board typically results in lower pressures.[15]

Contraindications

edit

Spinal precautions should not be used in patients who are at low risk of spinal injury.[7] If intubation is required the cervical collar should be removed and neck stabilization provided by a trained staff member holding the patient's head.[3][13] Whenever possible, intubation methods that decrease spinal motion should be used such as awake fiberoptic intubation.[6]

In those with penetrating neck or head trauma spinal immobilization may increase the risk of death.[14][10]

Controversy

edit

There is little high quality evidence for spinal motion stabilization of the neck before arrival at a hospital.[12][10][16] Multiple studies have demonstrated that current methods used to immobilize the spine in the field do not improve patient outcomes.[9] Additionally, because spinal cord injury is rare, it is estimated that if everyone at risk for spine injury was placed on spinal precautions, approximately 50-100 people would be put on precautions for every one person who actually had an injury.[4] The benefit of spinal precautions is also questioned because the initial forces that lead to spine injury tend to be massive, while forces experienced during transport are subsequently minor.[7] Thus, there is skepticism that movement during transport could cause a new or worsened spinal cord injury if an initial high-impact injury, such as a car crash, did not.[7]

Spinal precautions including a cervical collar and rigid board have been shown to delay time to intubation, increase risk of aspiration, raise intracranial pressure and cause pain, agitation, and pressure ulcers.[4][12][17] A systematic review found cervical collar related skin ulcers from the devices in 7 to 38%.[18]

There are no high-quality randomized trials supporting the practice of spinal cord immobilization in the field.[12] However, secondary injury (i.e. injury to the spinal cord during transport after an initial trauma), is suspected to be the cause of up to 1/4 of spinal cord injuries.[12] Because of the devastating consequences of spinal cord injury and the theoretical benefit of spinal precautions in preventing secondary injury to the spinal cord, the use of spinal precautions is still recommended in high-risk patients by major societies.[12]

Clearance

edit

Due to their side-effects, backboards should be removed as soon as possible, even before imaging.[6][7] It is also recommended to remove cervical collars as soon as possible.[6] If patients require ongoing cervical spine precautions, they should be switched to an adjustable cervical collar such as a Miami J collar[6] or halo-gravity traction device for long-term immobilization.[12]

Cervical Spine Clearance

edit
 
The Canadian C-spine rule for those with a normal Glasgow coma scale and who are otherwise stable
Main article: Clearing the cervical spine

There are two main algorithms, the Canadian C-spine rule and NEXUS, which are used to decide who requires cervical spine imaging via CT scan[6] after blunt trauma, and who can be cleared without imaging.[4] The Canadian C-spine rule appears to have greater sensitivity and specificity (i.e. fewer false positives and false negatives).[19] However, following either rule is reasonable.

If the chosen decision rule (NEXUS or Canadian C-spine) is negative, or if cervical spine imaging is negative, the cervical collar can be removed if the patient does not have significant midline tenderness and can move the neck 45 degrees to both sides.[6] If a patient cannot do both, the collar should be replaced and additional imaging or follow-up should be pursued depending on facility guidelines.[6]

 
CT scan demonstrating one thoracic vertebra

Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Clearance

edit

Unfortunately, the NEXUS and Canadian C-Spine rules do not apply to suspected thoracic or lumbar injury; indeed, there are currently no validated guidelines for who requires imaging in this setting.[4][6] Instead, imaging should be obtained according to physician gestalt.[6] High-risk features include tenderness in the center spine, new numbness or weakness, or spinal fracture of another area; imaging of the thoracic and lumbar spine should be pursued in patients with these findings.[6][12] If a patient's cervical spine has been cleared, but they have a thoracic or lumber spine injury, the cervical collar can be removed but they must maintain thoracolumbar immobilization using a firm padded bed and careful maneuvers for transfers and repositioning.[12]

If a patient has new numbness or weakness but without evidence of a spinal fracture on CT-scan, they may have spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality (SCIWORA), and may require MRI to confirm the diagnosis.[12] Spinal precautions should be maintained while pursuing further imaging.[12]

Postoperative

edit
 
Fracture of the cervical spine (left red arrow showing vertebral body fracture) treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (hardware seen on the right)

Patients with spinal cord injury due to trauma tend to have other life-threatning traumatic injuries or complications of spinal cord injury such as neurogenic shock[12] that take precedence to repair of the spine.[6] Thus, spinal motion restriction should be maintained while other medical interventions are begun.[6] Neurological outcomes may be better with early spine repair when possible,[20] however the evidence is low-quality.[12]

In all patients with spinal cord injury, high-quality skin care to prevent pressure ulcers is essential.[12] This includes adequate cushioning, frequent repositioning of the patient, keeping the skin dry and clean, and ensuring adequate nutrition.[12]

After surgery for an unstable spinal fracture, methods to reduce movement of the spine vary depending on the severity of injury and method of repair.[8] Surgeons strongly recommend to avoid smoking, as it slows healing.[21] There is also debate that NSAID medications such as aspirin, ibuprofen, and naproxen may delay bone repair after spinal fusion or grafting, however there is some evidence that short-term use around the time of surgery is not associated with worse outcomes.[21] Finally, patients should avoid activities that cause movement to the spine, including bending, lifting more than 5-10 pounds, or twisting the spine for 4-12 weeks after surgery.[22] Patients can learn special ways to get out of bed and do other activities during this time.[20] Other activities that should be avoided until a provider permits them include soaking in water like a bathtub or hottub, sports (running, horseback riding, etc.), and chores (vacuuming, sweeping, opening windows/jars etc.).[22]

Methods

edit
 
Depiction of the halo traction device.

There are multiple devices that can be used in addition to avoiding maneuvers or activities that move the spine.[8][20] Long-term cervical spine immobilization in patients with cervical spine fracture who did not undergo surgery can be performed using a long-term cervical collar (Miami J,[6][8] Philadelphia,[8] or Aspen[8]) or halo traction device.[8][12] When using a traction device such as the halo to hold the spine in place while it heals, this is called closed reduction, as opposed to a surgery which is termed open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF).[20] In general, the halo traction device is preferred for unstable fracture, while the cervical collars are used for neck sprain, stable fracture, or after surgical fixation.[8] Soft cervical collars do not restrict head movement and are more so used for comfort.[8] The sternal occipital mandibular immobilizer (SOMI) can also be used to provide support for cervical spine sprain, stable fracture, or postoperative support.[8]

For thoracic and lumbar spine, support can be provided using custom-fit, hard-shell back braces, most commonly after surgery.[8]

 
A patient in the LA County Medical Center intensive care unit with a Halo orthosis in place. (July 2004)

These devices are used while the spine is healing and are not needed permanently.[8]

History

edit

Spinal precautions including prehospital use of a backboard and cervical collar were first introduced in the United States in the 1960's.[7] Before the widespread use of spinal precautions in the 1970s, 55% of patients referred to spinal cord injury centers had complete spinal cord injury.[12] In the 1980s, spinal immobilization was initially used routinely for people who had experienced physical trauma, with little evidence to support its use.[23] However, the majority of patients in the 1980s had incomplete spinal cord injury, indicating an improvement in outcomes from the 1970's to the 1980's.[12]

The widespread use of routine spinal precautions drew criticism and prompted studies investigating the ability of EMS providers to selectively determine who required spinal precautions in the field in the late 1990's and early 2000's.[12] These studies led to the 2008 recommendation by the Consortium of Spinal Cord Medicine to only immobilize high-risk patients.[12]

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Pollak, Andrew (1999). Refresher: Emergency Care and Transportation of the Sick and Injured. Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 302. ISBN 9780763709129.
  2. ^ Vaccaro, A. R.; Silber, J. S. (2001-12-15). "Post-traumatic spinal deformity". Spine. 26 (24 Suppl): S111–118. doi:10.1097/00007632-200112151-00019. ISSN 0362-2436. PMID 11805617.
  3. ^ a b c Ahn, Henry; Singh, Jeffrey; Nathens, Avery; MacDonald, Russell D.; Travers, Andrew; Tallon, John; Fehlings, Michael G.; Yee, Albert (August 2011). "Pre-hospital care management of a potential spinal cord injured patient: a systematic review of the literature and evidence-based guidelines". Journal of Neurotrauma. 28 (8): 1341–1361. doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1168. ISSN 1557-9042. PMC 3143405. PMID 20175667.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i Connor, D.; Greaves, I.; Porter, K.; Bloch, M.; consensus group, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care (December 2013). "Pre-hospital spinal immobilisation: an initial consensus statement". Emergency Medicine Journal: EMJ. 30 (12): 1067–1069. doi:10.1136/emermed-2013-203207. ISSN 1472-0213. PMID 24232011.
  5. ^ Winn, Richard (January 21, 2022). Youmans & Winn Neurological Surgery (8th ed.). Elsevier. pp. 2415–2426. ISBN 978-0-323-67499-7.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Stein, Deborah M.; Knight, William A. (September 2017). "Emergency Neurological Life Support: Traumatic Spine Injury". Neurocritical Care. 27 (Suppl 1): 170–180. doi:10.1007/s12028-017-0462-z. ISSN 1556-0961. PMID 28913694.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m White CC, 4th; Domeier, RM; Millin, MG; Standards and Clinical Practice Committee, National Association of EMS, Physicians (Apr–Jun 2014). "EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard - resource document to the position statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma". Prehospital Emergency Care. 18 (2): 306–14. doi:10.3109/10903127.2014.884197. PMID 24559236. S2CID 207521864.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Cifu, David X. (2020). Braddom's Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sixth Edition (6th ed.). Elsevier. pp. 248–260. ISBN 978-0-323-62539-5.
  9. ^ a b c d Velopulos, Catherine G.; Shihab, Hasan M.; Lottenberg, Lawrence; Feinman, Marcie; Raja, Ali; Salomone, Jeffrey; Haut, Elliott R. (May 2018). "Prehospital spine immobilization/spinal motion restriction in penetrating trauma: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST)". The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 84 (5): 736–744. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001764. ISSN 2163-0763. PMID 29283970.
  10. ^ a b c Oteir, AO; Smith, K; Stoelwinder, JU; Middleton, J; Jennings, PA (12 January 2015). "Should suspected cervical spinal cord injury be immobilised?: A systematic review". Injury. 46 (4): 528–35. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.032. PMID 25624270.
  11. ^ National Association of EMS Physicians; American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (2012). "EMS Spinal Precautions and the Use of the Long Backboard Position Statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma" (PDF). American College of Surgeons. Retrieved November 27, 2024.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine (2008). "Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals". The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 31 (4): 403–479. doi:10.1043/1079-0268-31.4.408 (inactive 2024-11-14). ISSN 1079-0268. PMC 2582434. PMID 18959359.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  13. ^ a b Ahn, H; Singh, J; Nathens, A; MacDonald, RD; Travers, A; Tallon, J; Fehlings, MG; Yee, A (August 2011). "Pre-hospital care management of a potential spinal cord injured patient: a systematic review of the literature and evidence-based guidelines". Journal of Neurotrauma. 28 (8): 1341–61. doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1168. PMC 3143405. PMID 20175667.
  14. ^ a b Stuke, LE; Pons, PT; Guy, JS; Chapleau, WP; Butler, FK; McSwain, NE (September 2011). "Prehospital spine immobilization for penetrating trauma--review and recommendations from the Prehospital Trauma Life Support Executive Committee". The Journal of Trauma. 71 (3): 763–9, discussion 769-70. doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e3182255cb9. PMID 21909006.
  15. ^ a b Ahn, H; Singh, J; Nathens, A; MacDonald, RD; Travers, A; Tallon, J; Fehlings, MG; Yee, A (August 2011). "Pre-hospital care management of a potential spinal cord injured patient: a systematic review of the literature and evidence-based guidelines". Journal of Neurotrauma. 28 (8): 1341–61. doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1168. PMC 3143405. PMID 20175667.
  16. ^ Sundstrøm, T; Asbjørnsen, H; Habiba, S; Sunde, GA; Wester, K (15 March 2014). "Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review". Journal of Neurotrauma. 31 (6): 531–40. doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3094. PMC 3949434. PMID 23962031.
  17. ^ White CC, 4th; Domeier, RM; Millin, MG; Standards and Clinical Practice Committee, National Association of EMS, Physicians (Apr–Jun 2014). "EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard - resource document to the position statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma". Prehospital Emergency Care. 18 (2): 306–14. doi:10.3109/10903127.2014.884197. PMID 24559236. S2CID 207521864.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  18. ^ Ham, W; Schoonhoven, L; Schuurmans, MJ; Leenen, LP (April 2014). "Pressure ulcers from spinal immobilization in trauma patients: a systematic review". The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 76 (4): 1131–41. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000000153. PMID 24662882. S2CID 23746350.
  19. ^ Michaleff, ZA; Maher, CG; Verhagen, AP; Rebbeck, T; Lin, CW (6 November 2012). "Accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and NEXUS to screen for clinically important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma: a systematic review". Canadian Medical Association Journal. 184 (16): E867-76. doi:10.1503/cmaj.120675. PMC 3494329. PMID 23048086.
  20. ^ a b c d Cifu, David X (2020). Braddom's Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (6th ed.). Elsevier. pp. 1049–1100. ISBN 9780323625395.
  21. ^ a b Debono, Bertrand; Wainwright, Thomas W.; Wang, Michael Y.; Sigmundsson, Freyr G.; Yang, Michael M. H.; Smid-Nanninga, Henriëtte; Bonnal, Aurélien; Le Huec, Jean-Charles; Fawcett, William J.; Ljungqvist, Olle; Lonjon, Guillaume; de Boer, Hans D. (May 2021). "Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations". The Spine Journal: Official Journal of the North American Spine Society. 21 (5): 729–752. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.001. ISSN 1878-1632. PMID 33444664.
  22. ^ a b "Activities of Daily Living After Spinal Injury or Surgery - 08/2023 | Health Online". healthonline.washington.edu. Retrieved 2024-11-12.
  23. ^ Oteir, AO; Smith, K; Jennings, PA; Stoelwinder, JU (August 2014). "The prehospital management of suspected spinal cord injury: an update". Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 29 (4): 399–402. doi:10.1017/s1049023x14000752. PMID 25046238. S2CID 19574297.
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Spinal_precautions&oldid=1259932761"