Venezuelan opposition to the Chavista governments of former President Hugo Chávez and current President Nicolás Maduro, commonly referred to as the Venezuelan opposition, or sometimes, anti-Chavismo, is a political umbrella term used to describe political, social and religious movements that have opposed Chavismo, and the associated Bolivarian Revolution political process since 2 February 1999.
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ca/Henrique_Capriles_Radonski_from_Margarita_island.jpg/220px-Henrique_Capriles_Radonski_from_Margarita_island.jpg)
Background
editAfter the February 1992 coup attempt, The first reaction of the traditional political parties was channeled in the Venezuelan Congress, through a document of condemnation, approved unanimously and without discussion, of the actions of Chávez and his companions, as well as an endorsement to democracy as a form of government.[2] Congressman David Morales Bello specifically exlaimed "Death to the coup plotters!".[3]
Chávez became a presidential candidate in April 1997, after obtaining the approval of his political movement, the MBR-200, to participate in the 1998 elections, founding the Fifth Republic Movement party.[4] At the moment, the frontrunner was Irene Sáez, Miss Universe 1981 and Mayoress of the Chacao Municipality, but she lost popularity after receiving the backing from COPEI.[5][6]
Chávez was declared the winner of the 1998 presidential elections and the opposition electoral front, the Polo Democrático, dissolved afterwards. However, despite losing the presidential elections, the non-Chavista political forces held a majority in Congress and represented an obstacle for Chávez's Constituent Assembly, as he promised to seek their support to push it forward.[7][8]
Chávez presidency
edit1999 Constituent Assembly
editAlthough Chávez promised to seek the support of the opposition-dominated Congress before starting the Constituent process, on his first day as President, Chávez decreed a call for a referendum to determine whether a new Constitution should be drafted using a method proposed by him.[8] According to statements made at the time by the head of the Movement for Socialism parliamentary group, Chavismo's main ally in Congress, apparently even they had not been informed of this step beforehand.[9] Once again, the opposition was caught divided:[10] the COPEI party, Justice First and former candidate Irene Sáez, who had just formed an alliance with the Chavismo in the Nueva Esparta state, supported the decree;[9][11] Henrique Salas Römer's Project Venezuela and Democratic Action (AD) criticized the manner in which Chávez was leading the process, arguing that it excluded the Congress.[9] La Causa R and Convergencia were cautious as they did not know the details of the country's project proposed by the President.[9] Only the Movimiento Apertura of former President Carlos Andrés Pérez was completely opposed to the measure.[9]
The process promoted by Chávez was not set forth in the 1961 Venezuelan Constitution, but two favorable decisions of the Supreme Court of Justice in January 1999 paved the way for this proposal. The Supreme Court even ratified Chávez's opinion that since the Constituent Power was an "original power", it should not be subject to the powers established in the current Magna Carta.[12] The National Electoral Council (CNE) gave its approval after reviewing the bases proposed by the President, and the referendum was set for 25 April. Henry Ramos Allup, from Democratic Action, criticized then the behavior of the bodies, saying that they presented an "obsequious attitude" towards the President.[9]
The April 1999 Venezuelan constitutional referendum was held under a climate of electoral apathy. The abstention was 62.4%, and the result was overwhelmingly in favor of the proponents of the Constituent, who obtained a vote of 87.8%.[12] The bases proposed by Chávez and revised by the CNE were also approved, although with a slightly lower support. A proportional representation system in the selection of the members of the National Constituent Assembly was then discarded, and in its place a personalized uninominal direct representation system was established, which divided the country into two great national circuits and one electoral circuit for each state, a system in disuse since the dictatorship of Juan Vicente Gómez.[13]
The result of the election of constituents was the over-representation of Chavismo in the Constituent Assembly and a crushing defeat for the opposition, which had once again gone to the polls divided. With 65% of the votes, Chavismo obtained more than 95% of the constituents.[citation needed] Although the great majority of the candidates were civil society members, outside the political parties, the lack of unity atomized their efforts.[14] As such, 33% of the forces that voted for candidates unrelated to the Chavismo, only managed to bring seven constituents, one of them being Antonia Muñoz, a dissident Chavista who soon rejoined the ruling party.[14] Political parties and civil associations were marginalized from the constituent process, and the role of opposition then fell on the state institutions, where the Congress and the Supreme Court stand out. After the elections, Democratic Action and Copei experienced internal crises: the former announced new base elections to renew the party, and the directive of the latter resigned immediately.[15]
Although the Chavismo obtained near absolute control of the Constituent Assembly, this did not mean that Chávez did not find opposition within his own supporters to several of his proposals for the new Constitution.[16] There were several important changes pushed by Chávez which had initially been discarded by the Constituent Assembly, and which were only admitted under direct pressure from the President. Among the main ones were the inclusion of the term "Bolivarian" in the official name of Venezuela, the suppression of the voting "second round" or ballot, and the restriction of the taxing powers of the states.[16]
On 25 August, the conflict between the Constituent Assembly and the Congress openly broke out. Taking advantage of a parliamentary recess, the pro-government constituent majority occupied the Federal Legislative Palace, suspended the sessions of the Congress, reduced its commissions to a minimum and created a delegated commission made up of 23 congressmen who could legislate, but always subject to the veto of the Constituent Assembly in important matters.[16][17] Congressmen from Democratic Action, Copei and Project Venezuela protested the measure, which they called a coup d'état, and called for an emergency session in the Federal Palace. Aristóbulo Istúriz, president of the Constituent Assembly warned them that "the people would shut them down" if they tried to do so.[18] On 27 August, opposition congressmen tried to enter the Congress but were repelled by Chavista sympathizers, who injured thirty of the first ones when they tried to jump over the fence surrounding the building.[19] The Catholic Church mediated between the Constituent Assembly and the Congress, but although they managed to reach an agreement, the Congress continued to be reduced to its new role of delegated commission, sharing the building with the Constituent.[19] At the time, public opinion interpreted the congressional protests as vain attempts by the discredited traditional political class to stop the changes.[16] At the same time that the Constituent Assembly minimized the Congress, it also created an "emergency commission" to reorganize the Judicial Power. Due to a sentence issued by the Supreme Court at the beginning of the year, the Constituent Assembly could do so as the "original power". The decision was challenged, but when Cecilia Sosa, the president of the high court, resigned after realizing that her colleagues were going to ratify the January decision, as she considered that the rule of law was being violated with the decision:[20]
I believe that by complying with the decree of the National Constituent Assembly that establishes the judicial emergency, the Supreme Court dissolves itself (...) Simply put, the Supreme Court of Justice of Venezuela committed suicide to avoid being assassinated. The result is the same, it is dead.
— Cecilia Sosa, president of the Supreme Court of Venezuela
Although in theory the Constituent Assembly also had the power to intervene the executive branch, the presidential powers, governors and mayors were left untouched, although the Fatherland For All party, then part of the ruling party, considered he idea of removing three opposition governors using the constituent power. For his part, Chávez did not oppose to be ratified by the body, and was sworn in again before the Constituent.[21]
After over three months of work, the Constituent presented its draft constitution on 19 November, which was only opposed by four constituents: Claudio Fermín, Alberto Franceschi, Jorge Olavarría and Virgilio Ávila Vivas, who argued that power was being centralized and that a military estate was going to be formed.[22][23] A referendum was then called for 15 December in order to approve or reject the text. Democratic Action, Copei, Justice First, Project Venezuela and Fedecamaras campaigned against the approval of the Constitution. Although these forces agreed that a new Magna Carta was necessary in general, they were in complete disagreement with the result, where their representation had been symbolic.[24][25][26][27]
The December 1999 constitutional referendum took place under the same climate of apathy as the one held in April, although the turnout rose to 44.37%. The new votes were endorsed to the opposition to the new constitution, as the Chavismo suffered marginal losses.[28][29] Although the state of fragmentation of the partisan opposition, which seemed not to have overcome the 1998 defeat, did not allow them to assume an enthusiastic campaign for the "No", the opposition experienced an increase of 142% with respect to the last referendum.[28][29][30] However, the majority of Venezuelans continued to show disinterest in the struggle between pro-government and opposition, even when the constitution was at stake.[30]
2000 mega-elections
editFrom then until 2003, the opposition parties were eclipsed in their struggle against the government, and ceded political protagonism to various sectors of civil society. Being directly affected by the government's actions, the business community, the unions, the media and even the Catholic clergy took an attitude opposed to them.
Chavez's next electoral challenge was the "2000 mega-elections", these were aimed at electing those who would occupy all popularly elected positions, which numbered more than six thousand.[31] Venezuela was going through economic problems: although the price of oil had tripled since Chávez's arrival, the economy had sunk 7%, unemployment had increased, and foreign investors had moved away from the country.[32] However, in spite of these problems and with the traditional political parties weakened, Chavez's reelection was imminent.[31]
Only two politicians, Antonio Ledezma and Claudio Fermín, both former members of Democratic Action and former mayors of the Libertador Municipality of Caracas, made public their intentions to run against the President, both independently. Unexpectedly, in mid-February 2000, Chávez's other partners: Francisco Arias Cárdenas, Jesús Urdaneta and Joel Acosta Chirinos; made a public statement giving Chávez an ultimatum to imprison some members of his government, since they assured that they had irrefutable evidence proving their corruption, including the President of the legislative power, Luis Miquilena, and foreign affairs minister José Vicente Rangel.[32][33] Chávez's responded by criticizing his former colleagues, whom he reproached for "not having washed the rags at home".[33]
On 15 March Arias Cárdenas, supported by Urdaneta and Acosta Chirinos, registered his candidacy for the presidential election. Upon learning of this, Ledezma withdrew his, but Fermin did not.[31] Miquilena's response was to qualify as "trash" those who abandoned Chávez to support Arias Cárdenas.[34] The new opposition leader received support from La Causa R and a handful of small leftist parties, although not from Democratic Action and Copei. Even though some analysts considered Arias Cardenas more pragmatic than Chávez, others such as Eleazar Díaz Rangel declared that they were basically the same.[35]
Originally scheduled for 28 May, the directors of the National Electoral Council, appointed by the Chavista majority of the Constituent Assembly, proved to be inefficient, and only two days before the elections were to be held, the Supreme Court of Justice suspended them since the Electoral Council was not ready yet.[36] Arias Cárdenas called his supporters to gather in front of the CNE to protest, but they were repelled by a group of Chavistas.[citation needed]
Decree 1011
editIn October 2000, Hugo Chávez promoted the Presidential Decree 1011 (Spanish: Decreto 1011), whose text partially modified the Regulations for the Exercise of the Teaching Profession by creating a new administrative figure, that of itinerant supervisors, which partially modified the Regulations for the Exercise of the Teaching Profession and created the figure of National Itinerant Supervisors in educational institutions, who could be appointed directly by the Minister of Education, Culture and Sports. Their authorities and functions included reporting, accountability directly to the Minister of Education and even the appointment and removal of their directors. The decree also allowed Cuban teachers to participate in literacy plans in Venezuela.[37][38][39]
The decree was very controversial and generated the first opposition movement to the government of Hugo Chávez, which mobilized tens of thousands of people from civil society during the rest of the year 2000 to protest against the decree under the slogan "don't mess with my children". Civil groups and private sectors filed nullity actions before the Supreme Court of Justice against the creation of official supervisors; such legal actions were dismissed by the Supreme Court. On 1 April 2001, in the television program Aló Presidente, he asked how the groups would react to the Education Law "if they scream for a decree" which establishes the supervision of schools. He declared that "he who does not owe it does not fear it" and therefore questioned the opposition of those "very small sectors" that participate in mobilizations such as the one carried out on 31 March in Caracas.[40] Despite the insistence with the implementation of the decree, it could not be put into practice due to the opposition and the criticism of the civil society.[41][42]
The 49 Laws
editBetween 2001 and 2003, multiple chavistas started opposing Chávez as well.[43] On 28 July 2001, Pedro Carmona defeats Alberto Cudemus, a businessman close to Chavism, in the elections for President of Fedecámaras.[44] On August 4, Carmona coincides with Chavez at the Venezuelan Military Academy, where the anniversary of the National Guard was being celebrated. According to Carmona, Chávez told he no longer wanted conflicts with Fedecámaras, and they plan a meeting on 22 August at the Miraflores Presidential Palace.[45] At the meeting, Carmona proposes to Chávez a plan to lower unemployment, at that time at 17%, improving conditions in order to increase private investment up to 20% of the GDP in five years, while the latter responds with a plan to strengthen the public sector.[46] A dialogue table was then created between Fedecámaras and the government, the latter represented by Jorge Giordani, Minister of Planning. The meetings did not bring results, despite the fact that they took place once a week and that Chávez was present in one of them. The government continued to elaborate 49 controversial laws without sharing their content with Fedecámaras or its agrarian equivalent, Fedenaga, which its critics argued violated Articles 206 and 211 of the Constitution.[47][48]
On 13 November, Chavez decrees the 49 laws under the enabling law granted to him by the National Assembly in November 2000, a legal instrument which allowed him to legislate without the approval of the legislative power. Although originally two thirds of the Assembly were controlled by Chavismo, the situation had changed due to the fact that some deputies had become dissident and it was unlikely that Chávez would be able to obtain another enabling law, reason for which Chávez approved the laws the day before his special power expired. The laws included the Organic Hydrocarbons Law, the Fishing Law, the Special Law of Cooperative Associations and the General Ports Law, among others, but the Land and Agrarian Development Law was the most controversial.[49][50] Under the last law, the Venezuelan government gained the power to take private lands if they exceeded the size limit imposed by law and were classified as latifundiums, or if it considered that they were being exploited below their potential. Additionally, the State now had to approve the owner's use of the land, and all owners were obliged to prove the ownership of their lands before 18 December, under the risk of losing them if they did not do so. According to The Miami Herald, at that time 95% of Venezuelan landowners did not have firm titles at the moment.[51][52]
Pedro Carmona suspends the dialogue with the national government and calls for an extraordinary assembly on 28 November. On that date he then proposes that a twelve-hour national strike be held on 10 December, and obtains the majority support of the business sector, although also the rejection of Miguel Pérez Abad, president of Fedeindustria.[53] On May 4, the Venezuelan Workers Confederation (CTV in Spanish), the main labor union of the country, joined Fedecámaras. Its general secretary, Carlos Ortega, had defeated the chavista Aristóbulo Istúriz in the CTV elections.[54] The opposition political parties became divided in their opinions on how to overcome the political crisis: Democratic Action insisted in the Assembly on appointing a medical board to prove the President's mental incapacity; Francisco Arias Cárdenas and his deputies called for a consultative referendum, the Movement for Socialism (MAS) asked for calling another Constituent Assembly; Justice First and the Catholic Church asked the government for a change of course. The strike was observed by 90% of the country, becoming Pedro Carmona and Carlos Ortega the opposition leaders.[55]
External videos | |
---|---|
Chávez firing PDVSA executives in national television and blowing a referee whistle, as if to expel them from a football match, 7 April 2002 |
Tensions worsened on 7 April, when Chávez fired PDVSA President Guaicaipuro Lameda Montero and 5 of the 7 members of the board of directors, mocking each one in national television by name and blowing a referee whistle, as if to expel them from a football match.[56][57] Chávez accused them of committing serious misconduct and sabotaging the state oil company, and also warned "I have no problem in scraping (firing) all of them, all of them, if all of them have to be scraped". The dismissed executives were Eddie Ramírez, managing director of the subsidiary Palmaven; Juan Fernández, manager of financial planning and control; Horacio Medina, manager of negotiation strategy; Gonzalo Feijoo, senior advisor of refining strategy; Edgar Quijano and Alfredo Gómez, human resources labor advisors, and Carmen Elisa Hernández, project analyst of PDVSA Gas.[58][59]
April 2002 protests and coup attempt
editOn 9 April 2002, the organizations of Fedecámaras, the Venezuelan Workers Confederation and other civil, political and religious associations called for an indefinite general strike. That same day, Chávez meets with generals Efraín Vásquez Velazco and Manuel Rosendo, as well as with PDVSA's President Gastón Parra, Attorney General Isaías Rodríguez and deputies Nicolás Maduro, Ismael García and Cilia Flores. Also present were several Chavista Ministers, governors and mayors, general Francisco Usón, the mayor of West Caracas Freddy Bernal, and the former guerrilla Guillermo García Ponce. Among other things, there was talk of applying the military contingency Plan Ávila, of paying a bonus of one and a half million bolivars to the oil workers who did not join the strike, and even of simulating a traffic congestion on the Francisco Fajardo Highway with chavista sympathizers to make it appear that the strike has not been effective.[citation needed] On 11 April, the third day of the strike, a rally was called for at PDVSA's headquarters in Chuao, Caracas, led by Pedro Carmona, Carlos Ortega and Guaicaipuro Lameda, the rally finally turned into a march,[60] with numbers estimated to be up to one million people,[61][62] heading to the Miraflores Palace to demand Hugo Chávez to resign from the presidency.[60] While the march was taking place, President Chavez ordered the military to activate Plan Ávila.[63] When the march reached the Llaguno Overpass. Opposition groups and Chavez supporters began to confront each other and were mostly controlled by the Metropolitan Police, between 2:30 p.m. and 3:45 p.m. Several people were shot and killed, both opposition and pro-government demonstrators.[64][65][66]
In the early morning of 12 April, the Military High Command announced through the Minister of Defense, Lucas Rincón Romero, that Chávez had been asked to resign as President of Venezuela, with Rincón declaring that he accepted.[67][68][69] Chávez was transferred to Fuerte Tiuna where he was imprisoned for a few hours, there he wrote a letter saying that he had not resigned, after which he was taken by helicopter to the prison in the Orchila Island.[70] By that date, Chavez' sympathizers had gone out to protest in front of the Miraflores Palace and in the Paratroopers Brigade in Maracay.[71][72]
The same day, Pedro Carmona swore himself in as president of Venezuela, establishing a transitional government that would call for elections in December 2002. His first official act was the dissolution of the National Assembly, the Supreme Tribunal of Justice, the National Electoral Council, the removal of the Attorney General, the Comptroller, and the Ombudsman, all governors, mayors and councilmen, and all diplomatic officials. The act also repealed all of the 49 enabling laws and changed the Constitution, by renaming the country as the Republic of Venezuela, taking away the Bolivarian qualifier.[73] Part of the agenda left by Carmona Estanga in the Miraflores office included a new ministerial cabinet and the controversial Carmona Decree.[74][75] General Raúl Isaías Baduel opposed Carmona's government and began to actively seek a way to restore Chávez to power.[71]
On 13 April and 14, troops loyal to Chavez succeeded in taking over the Miraflores Palace, and several of his ministers headed a temporary government until Chávez was released. Diosdado Cabello took over the presidency for less than 24 hours, and in the early morning of April 14, Chávez was released from Orchila Island and was reinstated as President of Venezuela.[76]
Plaza Altamira Military
editOn 22 October 2002, a group of fourteen military officers, both active and retired (including some who had been involved in the April coup), spoke out against the government in a pronunciamiento in the Altamira Square, eastern Caracas, declaring the square a "liberated zone" and inviting their fellow soldiers to join them with the aim of achieving Chávez's resignation.[77][78] The group was widely supported by civil society,[79] and during the course of the protest at least 102 more military personnel joined the group, as well as thousands of opposition demonstrators.[80] On 6 December, waiter João de Gouveia, fired into the crowd gathered in the square, killing three people and wounding 25 others. João was subdued and handed over to the authorities moments later.[81] On 20 February 2003, four other people participating in the rally, including three military personnel, were found dead, after apparently being abducted days earlier in the square.[82]
The government decided to let the protest continue, without repressing it. After several months, the rally lost momentum and failed to achieve its objectives.[79]
2002-2003 general strike
editOn 2 December 2002, days after the creation of a dialogue and agreement table sponsored by the Organization of American States and the Carter Center, Fedecámaras called for a strike on 2 December. Its duration was initially 24 hours, but it was extended day by day until it became an indefinite strike in the middle of the Christmas commercial season. Merchants, businessmen, employees and workers were promised that the strike would only last a few days until Chávez's resignation was achieved, but said resignation did not come.[83]
At the beginning, the strike only involved the companies of the employers' association and the unions affiliated to the Workers Federation, but soon PDVSA's directors and employees at the management level decided to support it. As such, the country was practically paralyzed. Only some state-owned companies, public land and air transportation, water, electricity and telephone services, and both the public and private media continued to work, although the latter decided to suspend their regular programming and the broadcasting of advertising, replacing it with political and informative programming 24 hours a day. Political spots were broadcast supporting the continuation or not of the strike and the holding of protests and marches in different parts of the country, promoted by the Coordinadora Democrática opposition coalition or by the government.[84]
On 5 December, the crew of the oil tanker Pilín León declared rebellion and anchored the vessel in the navigation channel of Lake Maracaibo. Most of the national media broadcast closely what was happening on a daily basis regarding the oil strike and other derived events, as well as other media such as newspapers or radio stations, although many ceased their broadcasting and others were censored. The government called in former PDVSA employees and technicians from universities and the Armed Forces in order to get the oil company working again. By the end of December, the objective was practically achieved, which was a hard blow for the promoters of the strike, and the strike weakened as the days went by. In mid-January 2003, the government managed to regain full control of PDVSA. The State decided to dismiss 15,000 employees for uncertain reasons, one of which was that they had been missing work for a long period of time.[85][86][87][88] On 21 December 21,[clarification needed] the tanker Pilín León was recovered and taken to a safe port through the navigation channel of Lake Maracaibo and under the Rafael Urdaneta bridge.[citation needed]
Finally, the opposition stopped the strike. Movements to start a recall referendum started years later.[89][90]
2004 recall referendum
editIn 2003, Coordinadora Democrática at first demanded a consultative referendum, which was characterized for not being binding. Chávez affirmed that he would only accept the referendum foreseen in the constitution, but the opposition was initially against the option accepted by Chávez, arguing that it had to be held in the middle of the presidential term, mid-2004, and that they would not be willing to wait that long since the country could be plunged into civil unrest.[91][92] Protests continued between January 2003, and in the following months the government accepted the request and prepared its "No" campaign.[93][94]
In August 2003, 3.2 million signatures were submitted to summon the referendum. Based on a legal technicality, the petition was rejected by the National Electoral Council (CNE), filled with Chávez allies, calling it flawed, stating that the signatures had been collected prematurely (before the middle of the presidential term), and that the petition had to be redone.[95][96] In September 2003, the government used a rapid mobilization squad to raid the Electoral Council offices.[97][98] The Economist reported that the government was punishing citizens who signed the referendum petition. Likewise, the government and some signers denounced threats of dismissal against workers of private businesses that did not prove that they signed against Chávez.[99]
In February 2004, on the television program Aló Presidente episode 180, Chávez announced that he had signed a document asking the CNE to provide copies of all the signatures of the petitioners for the referendum, in order to expose the opposition's "mega fraud".[100] The Electoral Council announced that the signatures presented had to be examined a second time, and on 27 February demonstrations to protest against the decision took place in Caracas and fifteen other cities, initially promoted by the Bloque Democrático (Democratic Block), a radical sector of the opposition which rejected the recall referendum as "a trap of the regime".[101] The opposition and government held negotiations and the demonstrations lasted for five days.[102] Nine people were killed during the protests,[101] hundreds were injured and at least 300 were arrested.[103]
The CNE ruled that it would allow a remediation process, which consisted of allowing a five-day period in May 2004 for those whose signatures were being questioned to confirm that they were authentic. At the end of this period, the number of signatures validated by the CNE reached 2,436,830, reaching the minimum number of signatures needed to call the referendum. During these days of signature validation, thousands of fake ID cards and equipment for their manufacture were confiscated in the course of police raids. The opposition argued that the equipment had been maliciously planted, while Chávez supporters argued that it was proof that the opposition had used the equipment to falsify signatures.[104][105]
The referendum was held on 15 August 2004 and included centers abroad, such as in the United States and Spain,[citation needed] which resulted in Chávez not being recalled.[106]
After the referendum the Tascón List, containing personal data and signatures of those who supported the recall, was subsequently disseminated. People who were on the list were denied government benefits and jobs in the following years.[96][107]
2005 parliamentary elections
editThe government announced in 2005 the parliamentary elections scheduled for the end of the same year. Since its announcement, the process was highly criticized by Henry Ramos Allup (secretary general of Democratic Action), Teodoro Petkoff (Movement for Socialism) and Manuel Rosales (A New Era).[108] Democratic Action withdrew from the election on 28 November, six days before the electoral process, showing its distrust of the electoral body, the National Electoral Council (CNE).[109] According to Ramos Allup, the fingerprint scanners allowed the electoral agencies to know which was the choice made by the voter, as demonstrated by computer technicians in the last few days before the CNE and international observers. He also denounced that the access to the software that registers the votes and the electoral roll was restricted to opponents and observers.[110] On 30 November, COPEI, Project Venezuela, Justice First, A New Era and Movement for Socialism all withdrew from the elections too.[111] The government did not postpone the elections and they were held on 4 December. The opposition managed that most of the voters abstained from voting in the process, which had a turnout of 25%. The ruling party took the majority of the parliament, achieving an absolute majority to legislate.[112] In February 2006 the Organization of American States released a report expressing concern about the Venezuelans distrust towards the electoral authorities. Chavez accused the OAS of stigmatizing the results of the elections and called the report as a "dirty document".[113]
2006 presidential elections
editWith the upcoming 2006 presidential elections, opposition leaders debated on how they could choose a single candidate. Julio Borges, of Justice First, proposed holding primary elections for August 2006. Among the candidates were: Manuel Rosales (A New Era), Teodoro Petkoff (independent), Sergio Omar Calderón (Copei), Wiliam Ojeda (Un Solo Pueblo), Cecilia Sosa (Federal Republican Party), Enrique Tejera París (independent) and Vicente Brito (Republican Movement).[114] The main candidates, Julio Borges and Teodoro Petkoff, agreed to withdraw from the pre-candidacy to endorse Manuel Rosales, based on his opinion polling support.[115][116] More than thirty political and civil organizations publicly expressed their support to Rosales. The trade union bureau of Democratic Actions, as well as its regional components and many party leaders, announced that they would support the single opposition candidate in the December elections.[citation needed] Rosales received 36.91% of the vote in the presidential election.[115]
2007 RCTV and referendum protests
editOn 28 December 2006, Chávez informed that he would not renew Radio Caracas Televisión's (RCTV) concession, which was due to expire on 27 May 2007, and therefore the signal had to stop programming on that day. The government argued that the refusal to renew was due to the position taken by RCTV during the 2002 coup d'état.[117] RCTV's directors declared that the channel's concession did not expire until 2021, calling the measure an abuse by the government, and demonstrations in support of the channel took place.[118] Supreme Tribunal of Justice rejected an appeal that argued that the license revocation was illegal. On 19 May, over 30,000 people gathered in Caracas to protest the decision, while there were also marches in Maracaibo, Puerto La Cruz, Valencia and other main cities in the country. A march in favor of the freedom of expression was organized on 21 May in Caracas, led by students and journalists.[119][120] The Supreme Tribunal later reaffirmed Chávez's decision that RCTV had to end its transmissions by 27 May.[121]
Protests continued in the following days and thousands of demonstrators protested outside the CONATEL headquarters on May 28 and 29.[citation needed] Around twenty students had to be hospitalized in Caracas due to tear gas inhalation, and on May 28 four people were shot and wounded in Valencia.[122][123]
On 15 August 2007, Chávez presented 33 articles before the National Assembly, which was in charge of discussing the constitutional reform and once sanctioned, it was to be sent to the National Electoral Council (CNE).[124] The proposals included turning Venezuela into a socialist nation and indefinite re-election of the officeholders.[115][125] The CNE received the project on 2 November,[126][127] which in turn was presented to the Venezuelan public in two blocks of articles, each one with the options "YES" and "NO" to either accept or reject the request.[128]
The reform was rejected by the majority of the opposition leadership and the opposition started the campaign for the "NO".[129] At first, Democratic Action called for abstention,[130] called to vote for the "NO" at the end five days before the proposal. The political parties that registered in favor of the "NO" were Primero Justicia, A New Era, For Social Democracy, COPEI, Movement For Socialism, Democratic Republican Union among others.[citation needed]
The referendum results rejected the constitutional reforms. After the results were known, members of the A New Era party pointed out the need for national reconciliation, Manuel Rosales said that a dialogue process with Hugo Chávez should be initiated and also proposed that the aspects considered positive of the project be approved,[131][132][133] including a social fund for the workers of the informal economy.[134][135] Leopoldo López referred that it was the moment to end with the division of Venezuelans and that from the moment of the results, work for inclusion, peace and tolerance should begin.[136]
Hugo Chávez reacted by calling the results a "shit victory" for the opposition, saying "Know how to manage your victory, because you are already filling it with shit. It's a shitty victory and ours, call it a defeat, but it's one of courage." He also said that it was possible to summon a second referendum, stating "We are going on the offensive again. (...) We launched the first offensive for the great constitutional reform, but do not think it is over. Get ready, because a second offensive towards the constitutional reform will come", and that "If signatures are collected, this reform can be submitted to referendum again under other conditions, at another time, in this same place called Venezuela".[137]
2008 regional elections
editIn early January 2008, some opposition political parties expressed their willingness to sign a unitary agreement to run in the regional elections of November of that year.[138][139][140] On 23 January, in commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the return of democracy to Venezuela, the coalition of National Unity (later known as the Democratic Unity Roundtable) was created, formed by the political parties A New Era (UNT), Justice First (PJ), Democratic Action (AD), Copei, Movement For Socialism (MAS), Radical Cause, Project Venezuela (PRVZL), Fearless People's Alliance (ABP) and Popular Vanguard (VP), reached an agreement committing to present joint candidates in all the states and municipalities of the country.[141] Other political parties representing the more radical opposition such as Alianza Popular, Comando Nacional de la Resistencia and Frente Patriótico denounced at the beginning that they were excluded from the agreement.[142] With the document, called National Unity Agreement, they expected to seek unitary candidacies for the regional elections, besides proposing ten national objectives of their "vision of the country".[143] The agreement also created a set of rules regarding decisions, including decisions being made by a majority of 3/5ths of members or 70% of the popular vote during election processes, the process to determine a joint candidate either through majority or a primary election and a unified policy framework.[115] Many For Social Democracy (Podemos) leaders expressed their support to the presentation of joint candidacies with the Unity, such as Ricardo Gutiérrez and Ernesto Paraqueima, announcing that they would support the candidacies of the above mentioned agreement for governorships and mayorships.[144][145] Ismael García, secretary general of Podemos and deputy for Aragua, announced on 29 April the support of his party to opposition candidates in the states of Lara and Miranda as well as in the Metropolitan District of Caracas for the regional elections.[146][147] The elections were held on 28 November 2008. The PSUV ruling party obtained 17 of the 22 governorships, representing 52% of the votes, while the opposition obtained 5 governorships, representing 41% of the votes.[148]
2009 referendum
editOn 8 June 2009, the National Unity Agreement was restructured to form the Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD), which is organized into 11 work units: relations with civil society, strategy, programs, human rights, decentralization, social affairs, international affairs, organization, mobilization and electoral issues.[149][150] The MUD proposes to strengthen the Venezuelan democratic system, guarantee human rights, consolidate national sovereignty, achieve a productive, just and free society, and the highest level of well-being for its citizens, all based on the precepts of the Venezuelan Constitution. On 22 April 2010, they presented the programmatic proposals of the Unity Table, under the name of "100 solutions for the people", which broadened the political and social content of the opposition coalition.[151]
The opposition grouped within the National Unity coalition, as in the 2007 referendum process, maintained a position totally opposed to the approval of an amendment on the extension of the presidential term or immediate reelection. One of the first opponents to refer to the possibility of a constitutional amendment was Henry Ramos Allup, who assured that four constitutional changes would be attempted: the first one referring to reelection, another one to create the figure of regional vice presidents, in addition to a third amendment to give constitutional rank to the Bolivarian Militia and to grant the power to the executive to appoint the magistrates of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice, as well as the members of the Citizen Power, (the Attorney General, the Ombudsman and the Comptroller General).[115][152]
The then leader of the opposition party, Manuel Rosales, said that it was an insult to call for another election because "the collectivity is overwhelmed by so many problems and also by the high cost of living and inflation" and also because the proposal had already been rejected a year ago.[153] After the official announcement, other opposition parties such as Acción Democrática (AD), Primero Justicia (PJ), Copei, Podemos and MAS, rejected the proposal as well.[154] Leaders of Radical Cause rejected the intention of reelection, considering it unconstitutional, although they also expressed that the best way to defeat it would be through the vote and demonstrations.[155] On 6 December 2008, they announced the formation of the "National Command for the No", but some of the opposition leaders such as Omar Barboza and Julio Borges, from UNT and PJ, respectively, indicated that they would try legal actions for considering the constitutional amendment initiative as unconstitutional and antidemocratic.[156][157]
The official results indicated that the "Yes" option (to approve the amendment) obtained 54% of the votes, and that the "No" option (to reject the amendment) obtained 45% of the votes. Movimiento Estudiantil and several opposition parties acknowledged the results of the CNE, but denounced the advantageism of the forces supporting the "Yes". Omar Barboza, Tomás Guanipa (leader of Justice First), Ismael García for PODEMOS, Freddy Guevara (metropolitan councilman), and student leader David Smolansky, among other opposition figures, acknowledged the results.[158][159]
2010 parliamentary elections
editFor the 2010 legislative elections, a new block of parties joined the coalition, including Podemos, MIN Unidad and Red Flag, among others. Most of them presented unitary candidacies, except for the parties Fuerza Liberal, Democracia Renovadora, Movimiento Laborista and Venezuela de Primera, which despite belonging to the Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD) did not support all the candidacies. Contrary to the case were the parties PANA, Conde, PMV, which although they are not formal members of the coalition, did support all their candidacies.[160][161] The Fatherland For All party, after breaking alliance with the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) ruling party,[162] decided not to join the MUD coalition but to run its own independent candidates, becoming the third political force in the country with two elected deputies after receiving a total of 3.14% of the national vote.[163][164]
The MUD obtained 47.22% of the votes, but did not obtain the majority with 65 seats. The PSUV obtained 98 seats after received 48.13% of the votes due to gerrymandering. However, this time it obtained a simple majority, unlike 2005 when it held an absolute majority.[165][166]
2012 presidential elections
editThe opposition discussed the possibility of participating in the election with a single electoral card in order to avoid the dispersion of the vote. Among the main proponents of this idea were Copei, MAS, Causa R, Democratic Action and Fearless People Alliance; while A New Era and Justice First, the two opposition parties with the highest vote in the last elections, did not support the proposal. However, on 30 July, 2011 they announced that they had unanimously agreed to use a unitary card, only for the presidential election.[167][168][169] Henrique Capriles, founder of Justice First, was chosen as the opposition presidential candidate for the 2012 presidential election. During his campaign, he also appealed to disillusioned chavista voters.[170][171]
Maduro presidency
edit2013 presidential elections
editFollowing the death of Hugo Chávez, Capriles was also a candidate for the 2013 presidential election, where the pro-government candidate Nicolás Maduro was declared winner by a narrow margin.[171][172] The opposition denounced irregularities during the process, and Capriles' campaign command said that they detected at least 3,500 irregularities had been detected during the voting process.[173][174] The opposition demanded for a total vote recount,[173][174][175] a request also made by National Electoral Council (CNE) rector Vicente Díaz and which was supported by the governments of Spain, United States, France, Paraguay, and the Secretary General of the OAS, José Miguel Insulza.[176][177][178][179][180] Nicolás Maduro accepted the audit proposed by the opposition[181][182] but was rejected by the CNE, which declared that the process was automated and that the proposed audit could not be carried out in the proposed terms, arguing that it was not foreseen in the legal system.[183][184][185]
The President of the National Assembly, Diosdado Cabello, announced that he would withhold the salaries of those deputies who questioned the legitimacy of Nicolás Maduro as President,[186] and in the 16 April parliamentary session he prevented said deputies from speaking. During the session, opposition deputy William Dávila (Democratic Action, Mérida state) was hit with a microphone by a pro-government deputy, for which he needed 16 stitches.[187]
Capriles formally presented his request on 17 April, with all the corresponding complaints and the petition for the total verification of the tally sheets. The CNE accepted the verification "in second phase" of 46% of the voting boxes not randomly audited at first.[188] However, this audit was not endorsed by Capriles, arguing that the same "should have been carried out together with a review of the voting notebooks",[189] and proceeded to challenge the electoral process for which reason the process was challenged before the Supreme Tribunal of Justice.[190]
During the 30 April parliamentary session, Diosdado Cabello ordered the removal of the microphones from the seats of the opposition deputies. Upon arriving at the floor, the opposition legislators had to wait for the pro-government deputies to take their seats. After almost three hours of delay in the beginning of the session, the microphones were returned and less than half an hour of the agenda was completed, Cabello prevented the opposition legislators from participating again in the debate and silenced William Dávila. Opposition deputies responded by sounding airhorns and vuvuzelas as a protest and displayed a banner reading "Coup to the Parliament".[191]
A brawl started; ANTV, the Assembly official television channel of the, focused the camera shots on the roof of the chamber and broadcast the audio of the Assembly Secretary, Iván Zerpa, when he was reading the approval of new additional credits.
Opposition deputy Ismael García said that the doors of the chamber were closed and that independent media outlets had no access to the Assembly hall.[192] The fight lasted several minutes and was reconstructed by amateur videos taken by the opposition legislators. At the beginning, the pro-government deputies snatched the banner and attacked the opposition deputies. Deputy María Corina Machado went up to complain to Diosdado Cabello when she was pulled by the hair, thrown to the floor and kicked in the face by pro-government deputy Nancy Ascencio, who minutes before had attacked her. Machado stated that Cabello laughed while the opponents were being attacked.[193]
Among the most badly injured were Julio Borges, who was hit in the left cheekbone, and María Corina Machado, who suffered a deviated nasal septum. Américo de Grazia, deputy for the Bolívar state, had to be hospitalized after being hit by five pro-government supporters and falling down stairs. Opposition deputies Ismael García, Nora Bracho, Homero Ruiz and Eduardo Gómez Sigala also suffered minor contusions. The United Socialist Party of Venezuela reported as injured its deputies Odalis Monzón, Nancy Ascencio, Maigualida Barrera and Claudio Farías. However, amateur videos taken by the opposition recorded that the same deputies promoted the attack against the opponents.[194]
Maduro did not have the charisma of his predecessor and as a result, began to lose support among his base.[175] Some opposition groups questioned that Maduro was born in Venezuela, saying that this would disqualify him from holding the presidential office in Venezuela.[195][196][197][198] By 2014, official declarations by the Venezuelan government officials shared four different birthplaces of Maduro.[199] Opposition followers argued that Maduro cited Article 227 of the Venezuelan constitution, which states that "To be chosen as president of the Republic it is required to be Venezuelan by birth, not having another nationality."[200] The pro-government Supreme Tribunal of Justice ruled in October 2016 that Maduro was born in Venezuela[201][200] The ruling did not reproduce Maduro's birth certificate but it quoted the Colombian Vice minister of foreign affairs, Patti Londoño Jaramillo, who stated that "no related information was found, nor civil registry of birth, nor citizenship card that allows to infer that president Nicolás Maduro Moros is a Colombian national".[202] In January 2018, the opposition-appointed Supreme Tribunal of Justice of Venezuela in exile decreed the 2013 presidential elections null after reportedly obtaining evidence that Nicolás Maduro was ineligible to be elected and to hold the office of the presidency, citing that he was born in Colombia.[203]
2014 protests
editIn February 2014, amid an economic decline and high crime, Popular Will founder Leopoldo López started La Salida, campaign whose objective was to "find a peaceful, democratic and constitutional solution to the government of Nicolás Maduro".[170][204][205] The government issued an arrest warrant against López, who turned himself in on 18 February and was imprisoned.[206][207]
2015 legislative elections and recall referendum project
editThe opposition won a majority in the National Assembly in the 2015 parliamentary election.[171] The lame duck chavista National Assembly proceeded to pack the Supreme Tribunal of Justice prior to its departure.[208][209]
The following year, the opposition started a project to summon a referendum to recall Maduro.[210][211] In September 2016, the Constitutional Chamber of said Supreme Tribunal of Justice declared null and void all acts emanating from the National Assembly, including any laws enacted, and declared the Assembly "in contempt,[212] and on 20 October the signatures collection to summon a recall referendum was suspended by the National Electoral Council.[210][211] In response, the National Assembly declared the "rupture of constitutional order" in Venezuela in an extraordinary session.[212] The suspension of the referendum was condemned by the OAS Secretary General and eleven OAS member states published an open letter expressing their concern.[213][214][215][216]
By 25 October, the National Assembly debated the possibility of impeaching Maduro for suspending recall referendum,[217][218] although the Venezuela constitution does not grant this power to the legislative branch.[219] Maduro would later bypass the opposition-led National Assembly by creating the 2017 Constituent National Assembly.[175]
2018 presidential elections
editOn 25 January 2018, the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice ordered the CNE to exclude the Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD) from the ballot validation process, making it impossible for the participation of the ballot card in the presidential elections. Hours before, Tania D'Amelio, one of the CNE rectors, declared that the MUD could not participate in the process for having open judicial proceedings in seven states.[220][221] In the same month, the main parties of the MUD, Democratic Action, Popular Will and Progressive Advance, as well their spokespersons, announced that they would participate in the 2018 presidential elections. The same month, politicians Juan Pablo Guanipa, Andrés Velásquez, Claudio Fermín, Henry Ramos Allup and Henri Falcón announced their candidacy by calling for a primary within the coalition.[222][223]
The National Constituent Assembly called for a snap election through a decree, whereas the presidential elections were originally scheduled for December 2018.[224] In the following days, the pre-candidates requested the postponement of the elections as provided in the constitution. Opposition leaders asked the government to ensure electoral guarantees in order to participate, and if no agreement was reached, the MUD would rule out going to the presidential elections.[225][226] On 21 February, the MUD coalition parties, except Avanzada Progresista, reached an agreement not to participate in the elections, declaring in a statement that "The premature event without guarantees (...) is only a show by the government to pretend a legitimacy it does not have".[227][228]
Three of the five presidential candidates (Nicolás Maduro, Henri Falcón and Javier Bertucci) later signed an electoral guarantees agreement that included the elimination of the "red points" of control of Chavismo, international observation and the return of the voting centers changed during the election of the Constituent Assembly and the 2017 regional elections. The agreement was questioned and rejected by the non-government organizations such as Voto Joven, Cepaz and the Global Observatory on Communication and Democracy. Beatriz Borges, the director of Cepaz, declared that "the electoral guarantees agreement is a deceit to the citizenry, since it contemplates points already established in the Law and which the CNE has not complied with".[229]
Presidential candidates Henri Falcón, Javier Bertucci and Luis Alejandro Ratti warned about the violation of the guarantees foreseen in the document. However, Tibisay Lucena, the president of the CNE, assured on 2 May that the Agreement of Electoral Guarantees was fully complied with.[230] During a visit to Delta Amacuro, Maduro delivered eight boats, nine ambulances and reopened the Tucupita airport "Antonio Diaz", among other announcements, violating the electoral law, which prohibits the use of public resources for campaigning, and one of the prerogatives included in the electoral guarantees agreement. On 8 May he violated the regulation again in a campaign act in Amazonas state by promising to supply fuel to the state in exchange for votes.[231]
Maduro was declared winner in the election results. Candidate Henri Falcón rejected the election before the official announcement of the results.[232] The CNE rector Luis Emilio Rondón, announced his rejection of the results, considering them "clearly flawed" and supporting the complaints by candidates Henri Falcón and Javier Bertucci, among which he highlighted the ruling party "red points" near voting centers, the advantageism that prevailed since the calling of the process in January and the use of Sstate resources to benefit the winning option in the national system of public media. Rondón offered the candidates office of the Commission of Political Participation and Financing so that they could present the irregularities they announced in order to "organize the claims corresponding to the clarification of all these aspects that tarnish the electoral process".[233]
The opposition National Assembly approved a statement "to disavow the alleged results (...) and especially the alleged election of Nicolás Maduro Moros as President of the Republic, who must be considered as a usurper"[234] The European Union,[235][236] the Organization of American States, the Lima Group and nations including Australia and the United States rejected the electoral process as well.[237][238]
Presidential crisis
editIn December 2018, Popular Will politician Juan Guaidó was named president of the National Assembly and began to form a transitional government.[239][240] Guaidó was declared interim president of Venezuela on 23 January 2019, beginning a presidential crisis.[241] The United States, European allies and Latin American countries recognized Guiadó as president as well.[241] Guaidó laid down three objectives: "Cessation of usurpation, transitional government, and free elections".[242][243][244][245][246] Establishing a government in Venezuela required three crucial elements: "the people, the international community, and the armed forces."[247] Guaidó led an attempt uprising against Maduro with a group of military defectors on 30 April 2019,[248][249] during which Leopoldo López fled house arrest.[250] The uprising ultimately failed.[251]
In December 2022, three of the four main opposition political parties (Justice First, Democratic Action and A New Era) backed and approved a reform to dissolve the interim government and create a commission of five members to manage foreign assets, as deputies sought a united strategy ahead of the next Venezuelan presidential election scheduled for 2024,[252][253] stating that the interim government had failed to achieve the goals it had set.[254]
2020 parliamentary elections
editIn 2020, twenty seven opposition parties informed that they will not participate in the parliamentary elections through a public statement and said that such elections would be fraudulent.[255] The Supreme Tribunal of Justice appointed ad-hoc boards through judicial decisions, intervening the Democratic Action, Popular Will and Justice First parties, although the judicial decision applied to the latter was removed.[256] The opposition rejected the judicial interventions.[257]
The Communist Party of Venezuela broke its ties of support to the government of Nicolás Maduro and then became part of the Popular Revolutionary Alternative, a coalition of leftist parties and movements critical of the government's policies.[258] During the electoral campaign, coalition leaders and candidates were victims of arrests, physical attacks and even received death threats.[259]
Second recall referendum project
editIn 2022, one of the main projects of the opposition was a recall referendum against the Maduro government. The National Electoral Council ordered the collection of the required signatures, 20% of the electoral registry, to be carried out in a single day, the equivalent of having to collect four million signatures in twelve hours, which resulted in not reaching the required signatures, the referendum being declared inadmissible and making it impossible to summon for another recall for Nicolás Maduro's second term.[260]
2024 presidential elections
editIn the 2023 Unitary Platform presidential primaries, the Venezuelan opposition selected María Corina Machado as their candidate for the 2024 presidential elections.[261] She was disqualified from holding office in Venezuela in June 2023.[262][263][264] Venezuelan NGOs and political parties have denounced the use of disinformation, death threats, and physical attacks by Chavismo supporters and by the National Liberation Army (ELN), a far-left Colombian guerrilla group, on opposition candidates.[265][266][267]
Opposition parties and organizations
editLeadership
editIn 2002, Pedro Carmona and Carlos Ortega briefly provided leadership for the opposition, and Henrique Capriles served as its leader during his candidacies in the 2012 and 2013 presidential elections. Following the opposition winning the majority in the 2015 parliamentary election, the National Assembly of Venezuela assumed leadership of the opposition. Juan Guaidó was the leader of the opposition during the presidential crisis, though he lost support as the opposition failed to achieve its objectives under his mandate.[268] Into the 2024 presidential elections, María Corina Machado was chosen as leader of the opposition.[261]
Parties
editDemocratic Unity Roundtable
editParty name | Acronym | Leader | Main ideology | International Associations | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Justice First
Primero Justicia |
PJ | Henrique Capriles Radonski | Humanism | None | |
A New Era
Un Nuevo Tiempo |
UNT | Manuel Rosales | Social democracy | Socialist International | |
Popular Will
Voluntad Popular |
VP | Leopoldo López | Progressivism
Social democracy |
Socialist International | |
Radical Cause
La Causa Radical |
LCR | Andrés Velásquez | Laboriousm | None | |
Progressive Movement of Venezuela
Movimiento Progresista de Venezuela |
MPV | Simón Calzadilla | Progressivism | None | |
Project Venezuela
Proyecto Venezuela |
PRVZL | Henrique Salas Feo | Liberal conservatism | IDU, UPLA | |
Clear Accounts
Cuentas Claras |
CC | Vicencio Scarano | Progressivism | None | |
Progressive Advance
Avanzada Progresista |
AP | Henri Falcón | Democratic socialism[citation needed] | None | |
Fearless People's Alliance
Alianza Bravo Pueblo |
ABP | Antonio Ledezma | Social democracy | None | |
Emergent People
Gente Emergente |
GE | Julio César Reyes | Social democracy | None | |
National Convergence
Convergencia Nacional |
CN | Juan José Caldera | Christian democracy | ODCA (observer) | |
Movement for a Responsible, Sustainable and Entrepreneurial Venezuela
Movimiento por una Venezuela Responsable, Sostenible y Emprendedora |
MOVERSE | Alexis Romero | Green politics | None | |
Ecological Movement of Venezuela
Movimiento Ecológico de Venezuela |
MOVEV | Manuel Díaz | Green politics | Global Greens |
Student groups
editSymbols
editThis section possibly contains original research. (November 2023) |
When the Chávez government introduced the 2006 flag of Venezuela, the opposition refused to recognize the new symbol, saying that they would continue using the 1954 flag, also known as the seven-star flag.[269][270] The eight-star design altered Venezuela's 200-year-old flag to feature a left-facing horse rather than right, and to add a star to represent the disputed Guayana territory.[270] The old flag has been used as a sign of opposition and has been used as a dividing symbol by the government and opposition, with some in the opposition viewing the eight-star flag as a representation of oppression.[269][271] Miss Universe 2009 winner Stefanía Fernández used the seven-star flag while walking down the runway at the Miss Universe 2010 competition.[271] Venezuelan opposition protesters and some individuals belonging to the Venezuelan diaspora continue to use the seven-star flag.[269]
Students that participated in the 2007 protests adopted the white hands as a symbol of nonviolence.[272][273][274]
Henrique Capriles popularized the use of the tricolor hat among the Venezuelan opposition during his presidential campaigns.[275]
See also
edit- Belarusian opposition
- Chinese democracy movement
- Generation of 1928
- Hong Kong democracy movement
- Interventions of political parties in Venezuela
- Junta Patriótica
- Kazakh opposition
- Opposition to Vladimir Putin in Russia
- United National Movement (Georgia)
References
edit- ^ "La gorra de la polémica" (in Spanish). El Mundo. 3 October 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2023.
- ^ Caballero 1998, p. 182.
- ^ El País (España), ed. (5 February 1992). "Críticas a Uslar Pietri por 'anunciar' la intentona". El País. Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Retrieved 16 August 2011.
- ^ Gómez Calcaño, Luis; Arenas, Nelly (January–June 2001). "¿Modernización autoritaria o actualización del populismo? La transición política en Venezuela". Cuestiones políticas. 26 (131). Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Jurídicas de la Universidad del Zulia: 61–89. ISSN 0798-1406. Retrieved 18 August 2011.
- ^ "Irene Sáez cae 30% en el término de tres meses en las encuestas". NotiTarde. 19 January 1998. Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 14 September 2011.
- ^ "El partido Copei acordó retirar apoyo a Irene Sáez y respaldar a Salas Römer". NotiTarde. 1 December 1998. Archived from the original on 14 March 2016. Retrieved 17 September 2011.
- ^ "Hugo Chávez, imparable en Venezuela". El Tiempo (Colombia). 1 August 1998. Retrieved 17 September 2011.
- ^ a b "Chávez modera su discurso". Clarín (Argentina). 3 December 1998. Retrieved 17 September 2011.
- ^ a b c d e f Agence France-Presse (4 February 1999). "Ante referéndum constituyente". Panamá América. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ Corrales, Javier; Penfold, Michael (2011). Dragon in the tropics: Hugo Chávez and the political economy of revolution in Venezuela. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. pp. 18–19. ISBN 978-0815704973.
- ^ Valente, Jesús (22 September 1999). "Constituyente: Henrique Capriles Radonsky". Analítica.com. Archived from the original on 4 October 2011. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ a b Combellas, Ricardo (January 2003). "El proceso constituyente y la Constitución de 1999". Politeia. 26 (30): 100–113. ISSN 0303-9757. Archived from the original on 27 July 2014. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ Rachadell, Manuel (January–June 2010). "El sistema electoral en la Ley Orgánica de Procesos Electorales" (PDF). Provincia (23): 127–155. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ a b Combellas, Ricardo (January 2003). "El proceso constituyente y la Constitución de 1999". Politeia. 26 (30): 100–113. ISSN 0303-9757. Archived from the original on 27 July 2014. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ "El huracán Hugo arrasó con todo". Página/12. 28 July 1999. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ a b c d Combellas, Ricardo (January 2003). "El proceso constituyente y la Constitución de 1999". Politeia. 26 (30): 100–113. ISSN 0303-9757. Archived from the original on 27 July 2014. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ Aznárez, Juan Jesús (27 August 1999). "Una institución de florero". El País (España). Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ Aznárez, Juan Jesús (27 August 1999). "El Congreso venezolano insiste en discutir hoy su futuro, pese al veto de la Constituyente". El País (España). Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ a b Vinogradoff, Ludmila (11 September 1999). "La Constituyente y el Congreso compartirán sede en Venezuela". El País (España). Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ APTN (25 August 1999). "Venezuela:President of Supreme Court Resings". Associated Press. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
- ^ Combellas, Ricardo (January 2003). "El proceso constituyente y la Constitución de 1999". Politeia. 26 (30): 100–113. ISSN 0303-9757. Archived from the original on 27 July 2014. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ Combellas, Ricardo (January 2003). "El proceso constituyente y la Constitución de 1999". Politeia. 26 (30): 100–113. ISSN 0303-9757. Archived from the original on 27 July 2014. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ Agence France-Presse (22 November 1999). "Se inicia campaña en Venezuela". Panamá América. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ "Copei ratificó su rechazo al proyecto constitucional". Analítica semanal. 1–8 December 1998. Archived from the original on 31 October 2005. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ "Constituyentes de la provincia emboscaron la descentralización". NotiTarde. 1 December 1999. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ "Empresarios, por el No". Clarín (Argentina). 24 November 1999. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ Valente, Jesús (22 September 1999). "Constituyente: Henrique Capriles Radonsky". Analítica.com. Archived from the original on 4 October 2011. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ a b "Resultados electorales referendo 15/12/1999" (PDF). Consejo Nacional Electoral (Venezuela). Retrieved 23 September 2011.
- ^ a b "Resultados electorales referendo consultivo nacional 25/04/1999" (PDF). Consejo Nacional Electoral (Venezuela). Retrieved 23 September 2011.
- ^ a b Pérez Baralt, Carmen (July–December 2000). "Cambios en la participación electoral venezolana: 1998-2000". Cuestiones Políticas. 25: 9–21. ISSN 0798-1406. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
- ^ a b c Aznárez, Juan Jesús (19 March 2000). "Duelo de comandantes". El País (España). Retrieved 5 October 2012.
- ^ a b "Deriva venezolana". El País (España). 22 February 2000. Retrieved 5 October 2012.
- ^ a b Vinogradoff, Ludmila (17 February 2000). "Los compañeros golpistas de Chávez amenazan con retirarle el apoyo si no encarcela a varios altos cargos". El País (España). Retrieved 5 October 2012.
- ^ "Comentarios: Nubarrones en las Megaelecciones" (PDF). SIC (623): 120. 2000. Retrieved 5 October 2012.
- ^ Aznarez, Juan Jesús (29 July 2000). "Guerra sin cuartel entre las dos caras de la revolución bolivariana". El País (España). Retrieved 5 October 2012.
- ^ Aznárez, Juan Jesús (26 May 2000). "El Tribunal Supremo de Venezuela suspende las elecciones por falta de condiciones técnicas". El País (España). Retrieved 5 October 2012.
- ^ "El DECRETO 1011 LOS SUPERVISORES ITINERANTES EN LA PERSPECTIVA DE LOS ADVERSARIOS Y DEFENSORES". 2000. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "Con mis hijos no te metas". www.noticierodigital.com. Archived from the original on 16 June 2018. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "Leonardo Carvajal: Resolución 058 pretende implementar el decreto 1011". www.noticierodigital.com. Archived from the original on 17 June 2018. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "Chávez: El Decreto 1011 va". Analitica.com (in European Spanish). 1 April 2001. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ Olivero, Ana Maria Siso (7 December 2008). "Sistema Educativo Bolivariano: Chávez y el Sistema Educativo Bolivariano". Sistema Educativo Bolivariano. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ Herrera, Mariano. ""Chávez y el Sistema Educativo Bolivariano"" (PDF).
- ^ Corrales, Javier; Penfold, Michael (2011). Dragon in the tropics: Hugo Chávez and the political economy of revolution in Venezuela. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. pp. 21–24. ISBN 978-0815704973.
- ^ "Venezuela: Hugo Chávez otro populista.-10 las 49 leyes". www.nodo50.org. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "EL PRIMER CHAVEZ EN LA PRENSA ESPAÑOLA" (PDF).
- ^ Estanga, Pedro F. Carmona (21 March 2011). "Desde la distancia: LIBRO: "MI TESTIMONIO ANTE LA HISTORIA", por Pedro Carmona E. 2005". Desde la distancia. Archived from the original on 11 May 2013. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE ADMITS THAT VENEZUELAN GOVERNMENT EXCEEDED ITS AUTHORITY IN ENACTING ENABLING LAW". Archived from the original on 4 April 2008. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "GOBIERNO VIOLÓ LA CONSTITUCIÓN". El Universal (in Spanish). 7 October 2018. Archived from the original on 2014-07-15. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "Chávez ha dictado 143 leyes vía Habilitante desde 2001". El Universal (in Spanish). 28 December 2011. Archived from the original on 17 June 2015. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "Chávez destacó que el gobierno aprobó 49 leyes en el marco de la Ley Habilitante". Analitica.com (in European Spanish). 14 November 2001. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "GACETA OFICIAL". www.ventanalegal.com. Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "LEY DE TIERRAS" (PDF).
- ^ "Hace 14 años Fedecámaras convocó a un paro patronal para desestabilizar al gobierno de Chávez | El Abrelata". elabrelata.com (in European Spanish). 20 December 2017. Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ "Empresarios venezolanos respaldan paro cívico". Emol (in Spanish). 19 November 2001. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ Palacio, Mayerlin. "11 de abril de 2002: El Golpe de Estado y la resistencia del pueblo". cucuta.consulado.gob.ve. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
- ^ Los Angeles Times 22 April 2002 Monday, "Rapid-Fire Coup Caught Chavez Foes Off Guard", BYLINE: HECTOR TOBAR, PATRICK J. McDONNELL, PAUL RICHTER, TIMES STAFF WRITERS, SECTION: PART A; Part 1; Foreign Desk; p. 1
- ^ Márquez, Laureano; Sanabria, Eduardo (2018). "Llegó la dictablanda". Historieta de Venezuela: De Macuro a Maduro (1st ed.). Gráficas Pedrazas. p. 155. ISBN 978-1-7328777-1-9.
- ^ "ABRIL 2002 CRONOLOGÍA DE LOS HECHOS – El Jojoto". www.eljojoto.net (in European Spanish). Archived from the original on 26 March 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Toro Hardy: Despidos tras paro petrolero en 2002 destruyeron a Pdvsa". Globovisión (in European Spanish). Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ a b "11 de abril de 2002: Esa marcha no llegará a Miraflores". Venelogía (in Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ Hawkins, Kirk A. (2010). Venezuela's Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective (1st publ. ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521765039.
- ^ Yergin, Daniel (2012). The Quest: energy, security and the remaking of the modern world (revised & updated ed.). New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0143121947.
- ^ On April 11, 2002, by radio, Chavez communicates with several high ranking military officers in order to coordinate the displacement of troops in Caracas.
- ^ http://brianandrewnelson.com/Venezuela/Video_Clips/Killing_of_Jesus_A_2.mov
- ^ http://brianandrewnelson.com/Venezuela/Video_Clips/Malvina_Tortoza.mov
- ^ "Caso Llaguno: Dos muertos, once sentenciados". El Universal (in Spanish). 7 November 2018. Archived from the original on 2012-06-29. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Cronología de un vacío de poder". 5 April 2007. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ Wilson, Scott (13 April 2002). "Leader of Venezuela Is Forced To Resign". The Washington Post.
- ^ Harnecker, Marta. (Z Communications, 9 January 2003)."Lessons of the April Coup: Harnecker interviews Chávez". Retrieved 7 September 2010. Archived 21 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "13 de abril de 2002: Chavistas retoman el poder y una carta escrita por su líder anima el rescate". NTN24 (in Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ a b "¿Quién es Raúl Baduel?". 6 November 2007. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Círculos bolivarianos protestaron" (in Spanish). Últimas Noticias. 13 April 2002. Archived from the original on 2 November 2003. Retrieved 11 April 2008.
- ^ "12 de abril de 2002: Carmona, disolución de poderes y caos en el país". Globovisión (in European Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ Meza, Alfredo; Lafuente, Sandra (April 2012). El Acertijo de Abril (Primera ed.). La Hoja del Norte. p. 217.
- ^ "Venezuela investiga el "Carmonazo"". 5 October 2004. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Diosdado Cabello: Yo ya fui presidente en el 2002 gracias a la derecha". Panorama (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "La oposición apoya a 14 altos mandos militares sublevados contra Chávez". El País (in Spanish). 2002-10-24. ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 2021-05-26.
- ^ "Un mes de rebeldía en la Plaza Altamira de Caracas". El Universo. 2002-11-24. Retrieved 2021-05-26.
- ^ a b Márquez, Laureano; Sanabria, Eduardo (2018). "Llegó la dictablanda...". Historieta de Venezuela: De Macuro a Maduro. Gráficas Pedrazas. p. 158.
- ^ "Venezuela, 60 días de rebeldía". El Universo (in Spanish). 2002-12-22. Retrieved 2021-05-26.
- ^ "Condena por muertos en protesta". BBC News. 2003-04-15. Retrieved 2021-05-26.
- ^ Caracas, Owain Johnson in (2003-02-20). "Anti-Chavez protesters murdered". The Guardian. Retrieved 2021-05-26.
- ^ "A 10 años del paro de 2002 - Economía - EL UNIVERSAL". archivo.eluniversal.com (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "MEMORIA HISTÓRICA | 02/12/2002: CTV, Fedecámaras y la Coordinadora Democrática (MUD) inician sabotaje petrolero como "ensayo" de la Guerra Económica". Ley Resorte (in European Spanish). 2 December 2016. Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Hace diez años sonó el Pito de la Infamia". www.noticierodigital.com. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ Olson, Alexandra (6 January 2003). "Chavez insists Venezuela oil industry rebounding". Associated Press. Retrieved 2023-11-16.
- ^ "Chávez despide a ejecutivos disidentes de Petróleos de Venezuela - ABR. 07, 2002 - Internacionales - Históricos - EL UNIVERSO". www.eluniverso.com. 7 April 2002. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Como "lacra" se refiere Chávez a ex empleados de Pdvsa y Eddie Ramírez le responde. + Video cuando reconoció generar la crisis en el 2002". El Weblog de Infragon (in European Spanish). 23 January 2010. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Venezuela: firmas y más firmas". 24 December 2003. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "La oposición venezolana cesa paro de dos meses - Edición Impresa - ABC Color" (in European Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Algunas lecciones para no olvidar del referendo revocatorio de 2004, por Carlos García Soto". runrun.es. 29 June 2016. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "A 11 años del referendo revocatorio del 2004: la ratificación inédita del gobierno de Chávez - Fotos". www.noticias24.com (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Masiva marcha en apoyo de Hugo Chávez". La Nación, Grupo Nación (in Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ Cooper, Andrew F.; Legler, Thomas (3 August 2005). "A Tale of Two Mesas: The OAS Defense of Democracy in Peru and Venezuela". Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations. 11 (4): 425–444. doi:10.1163/19426720-01104003.
- ^ "Venezuela: Con 3 millones de firmas oposición pide referéndum contra Chávez". Emol (in Spanish). 20 August 2003. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ a b Carroll, Rory (2013). Comandante : myth and reality in Hugo Chávez's Venezuela. Penguin Press: New York. pp. 100–104. ISBN 9781594204579.
- ^ "Mira las trabas que puso el CNE en 2004 para que no hubiera revocatorio contra Chávez - NotiTotal". NotiTotal (in European Spanish). 12 August 2016. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ Pol, Fernando. "Igadi na Rede / Venezuela: A batalla polo Referendo". igadi.org. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Venezuela: Oposición lista para recolección de firmas contra Chávez". Emol (in Spanish). 27 November 2003. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ Rojas, Alfredo (2004), "Chávez espera copia de planillas para mostrar fraude en cadena", El Universal
- ^ a b PROVEA (September 2004). Contexto y Balance de Situación (PDF). pp. 11, 16. Retrieved 30 December 2023.
- ^ Zeitlin, Janine (11 October 2007). "War on Hugo Chávez". Miami New Times. Archived from the original on 20 July 2008.
- ^ Zeitlin, Janine (11 October 2007). "War on Hugo Chávez". Miami New Times. Archived from the original on 20 July 2008.
'The real genesis for the plan, Alonso says, is an 88-page booklet, From Dictatorship to Democracy'; 'In December 2002, Alonso began feverishly e-mailing alertas criticizing Chávez and describing future action. His contact list swelled to more than two million e-mail addresses.'
- ^ ":: Consejo Nacional Electoral ::". www.cne.gov.ve (in European Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "COMENZÓ EL "REPARO" DE FIRMAS EN VENEZUELA". Radio y Televisión Martí | Martinoticias.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ Consejo Nacional Electoral. (in Spanish) Chávez Ratificado Con el 58 Por Ciento de los votos Archived 27 May 2010 at the Wayback Machine, 16 August 2004.
- ^ Malinarich, Nathalie (27 November 2006). "Venezuela: A nation divided". BBC News. Retrieved 10 January 2010.
- ^ "¿ES DICTADURA O NO? | ABC DE LA SEMANA". www.abcdelasemana.com (in European Spanish). Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ S.A.P., El Mercurio (29 November 2005). "Venezuela: Partidos opositores se retiran de elecciones | Emol.com". Emol (in Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "La oposición se retira de las elecciones legislativas en Venezuela - Wikinoticias". es.wikinews.org (in Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Partidos de oposición se retiran de las elecciones parlamentarias". Venelogía (in Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ "Venezolanos despojan a Chávez del poder absoluto". Diario la Prensa (in Spanish). Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ Press, Europa (7 February 2006). "Chávez califica de "documento sucio" el informe de la OEA sobre las elecciones de diciembre". europapress.es. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ^ HERNÁNDEZ, CLODOVALDO (10 July 2006). "Las controvertidas primarias de la oposición venezolana". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
- ^ a b c d e Jiménez, Maryhen (February 2023). "Contesting Autocracy: Repression and Opposition Coordination in Venezuela". Political Studies. 71 (1): 47–68. doi:10.1177/0032321721999975. S2CID 236367812.
- ^ "Manuel Rosales, proclamado candidato opositor". La Vanguardia. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
- ^ "Chávez to shut down opposition TV". 29 December 2006. Retrieved 13 July 2018.
- ^ "Venezuela: otra marcha por RCTV". 26 May 2007. Retrieved 13 July 2018.
- ^ "Venezuela: marcha por libertad de expresión". 6 June 2007. Retrieved 13 July 2018.
- ^ "Artistas en la "marcha por la libertad de expresión" en Caracas - El Carabobeño". El Carabobeño (in European Spanish). 27 May 2017. Retrieved 13 July 2018.
- ^ "Court: Venezuelan TV station must stop broadcasting - CNN.com". CNN. 26 May 2007. Archived from the original on 26 May 2007. Retrieved 13 July 2018.
- ^ «Noticias Flash - Heridos en protestas contra el cierre de RCTV en Venezuela»
- ^ "Latest news from around the world". the Guardian. Retrieved 13 July 2018.
- ^ País, Ediciones El (16 August 2007). "Chávez presenta la reforma constitucional que le permitirá gobernar indefinidamente". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ Alonso, Juan Francisco (2007-08-16). "Chávez presenta la reforma constitucional que le permitirá gobernar indefinidamente". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 2024-01-25.
- ^ "Justia Venezuela :: Constitución de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela > Título IX > Capítulo II :: Ley de Venezuela". venezuela.justia.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ EFE (3 November 2007). "Venezuela convoca el referéndum sobre la reforma constitucional para el 2 de diciembre". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ http://cdn.eluniversal.com/2007/08/16/reformaconstitucional2.pdf
- ^ "Oposición rechaza la reforma de Chávez - La Prensa". La Prensa (in European Spanish). 17 August 2007. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ Martínez, Ibsen (22 May 2018). "Opinión | Abstenerse es elegir". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ "Propuesta de cambios a la Constitución". El Universal (in Spanish). 16 July 2018. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ "La oposición venezolana reitera sus llamamientos a la 'reconciliación'". Archive.is. 29 June 2012. Archived from the original on 29 June 2012. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ "Propuesta de cambios a la Constitución". El Universal (in Spanish). 16 July 2018. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ "Globovision.com - Manuel Rosales exhortó a la comunión de todos los venezolanos". 27 December 2007. Archived from the original on 27 December 2007. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ "Líder opositor afirma que 'gana la democracia' y llama a la reconcili…". Archive.is. 29 June 2012. Archived from the original on 29 June 2012. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ "Propuesta de cambios a la Constitución". El Universal (in Spanish). 16 July 2018. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
- ^ "Chávez califica de 'victoria de mierda' el triunfo de la oposición". El Mundo. 6 December 2007. Retrieved 2024-01-25.
- ^ "Globovision.com - UNT propuso la unión y el consenso para las próximas elecciones". 6 December 2008. Archived from the original on 6 December 2008. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
- ^ "Nacional y Política". El Universal (in Spanish). 21 July 2018. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
- ^ "Nacional y Política". El Universal (in Spanish). 21 July 2018. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
- ^ "Nacional y Política". El Universal (in Spanish). 21 July 2018. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
- ^ "Nacional y Política". El Universal (in Spanish). 21 July 2018. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
- ^ "Globovision.com - Propuesta de Un Acuerdo de Unidad Nacional "La Alternativa para el Cambio", firmado por las organizaciones políticas de oposición el 23 de enero de 2008". 27 January 2008. Archived from the original on 27 January 2008. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
- ^ "Plataforma Bolivariana". www.nodo50.org. Retrieved 22 July 2018.
- ^ "El Nuevo Día - Podemos dispuesto a apoyar candidato opositor demócrata". 7 May 2008. Archived from the original on 7 May 2008. Retrieved 22 July 2018.
- ^ "Nacional y Política". El Universal (in Spanish). 22 July 2018. Retrieved 22 July 2018.
- ^ LF Angosto (2009), Bolívar, espejo de la revolución: los comicios regionales de 2008 en Venezuela
- ^ http://www.cne.gob.ve/divulgacion_regionales_2008/
- ^ "Mesa de la Unidad Democrática: Propuestas Programáticas" (PDF). Unidad Venezuela. 22 April 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 August 2014. Retrieved 2 October 2010.
- ^ "Unidad Venezuela". www.unidadvenezuela.org. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
- ^ "Mesa de la Unidad Democrática define estructura organizativa". Analitica.com (in European Spanish). 26 January 2011. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
- ^ Ramos Allup alerta sobre 4 enmiendas de Chávez El Universal. 30 de junio de 2008.
- ^ Rosales exhorta a no caer en el juego "diabólico" de la reelección indefinida El Universal. 1 de diciembre de 2008.
- ^ Oposición rechaza anuncio de Chávez de tramitar su reelección
- ^ Andrés Velásquez: La reelección es inconstitucional[dead link] Cadena Global. 3 de diciembre de 2008.
- ^ Dirigentes de la oposición anuncian creación de comando por el No El Nacional. 6 de diciembre de 2008.
- ^ Oposición anuncia puesta en marcha de comando por el "No" El Universal. 6 de diciembre de 2008.
- ^ S.A.P., El Mercurio (16 February 2009). "Oposición reconoce triunfo del "sí" en referendo sobre reelección ilimitada | Emol.com". Emol (in Spanish). Retrieved 3 August 2018.
- ^ ORDAZ, PABLO (16 February 2009). "Chávez consigue vía libre a la reelección". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 3 August 2018.
- ^ País, Ediciones El (13 September 2010). "La oposición de Venezuela se une contra Chávez". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
- ^ "Los pasos de Podemos con el chavismo por Venezuela y los 3,2 millones de dólares que se metieron en el bolsillo". diariolasamericas.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 15 August 2018.
- ^ "Análisis AP: Patria Para Todos se distancia de Chávez en Noticias24.com". www.noticias24.com. Archived from the original on 30 July 2018. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
- ^ "Patria Para Todos considera necesario "buscar una dirección" para los partidos afectos al gobierno de cara a las elecciones | COMUNICAS Venezuela". Venezuela (in European Spanish). 24 February 2010. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
- ^ "Los escenarios del país: Elecciones parlamentarias del 2010 vs 2015 - El Impulso". El Impulso (in European Spanish). 18 May 2015. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
- ^ Internet, Unidad Editorial. "Chávez sólo logra mayoría simple en el Parlamento tras el éxito de la oposición | Venezuela | elmundo.es". www.elmundo.es. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
- ^ "Divulgación Elecciones Parlamentarias - 26 de septiembre de 2010". 6 December 2010. Archived from the original on 6 December 2010. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
- ^ "MUD se debate entre tarjeta única o unitaria". 12 July 2011.[dead link]
- ^ "ABP respalda tarjeta unitaria". 10 May 2011. Archived from the original on 3 June 2013.
- ^ "MUD usará tarjeta unitaria en presidenciales 2012". 30 July 2011.
- ^ a b "Venezuela: Tipping Point". Crisis Group Latin America Briefing (30). International Crisis Group: 10. 21 May 2014.
López joined forces with Caracas metropolitan mayor Antonio Ledezma of the Courageous People Alliance (ABP) and independent congresswoman María Corina Machado in early 2014 in 'La Salida' to demand a change of government. This move was frowned on by the moderates in the MUD. Capriles, whose ability to appeal to disaffected chavistas had helped broaden the opposition's voter base, saw his leadership challenged by a faction whose message seemed intended to polarise, not unite, the electorate.
- ^ a b c Neumann, William (2022). Things are never so bad that they can't get worse: inside the collapse of Venezuela. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press. pp. 204–205. ISBN 9781250266163.
- ^ Cannon, Barry (2014). "As Clear as MUD: Characteristics, Objectives, and Strategies of the Opposition in Bolivarian Venezuela" (PDF). Latin American Politics and Society. 56 (4): 49–70. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2014.00248.x. S2CID 55502016.
- ^ a b ""El miércoles voy al CNE", dijo Capriles Radonski". Caracas: Últimas Noticias. 2013. Archived from the original on 4 October 2013. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
- ^ a b "Capriles solicita formalmente al CNE que recuente el 100 % de los votos". Europa Press. 18 April 2013. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
- ^ a b c Trejos, Amanda (23 August 2017). "Why is Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro so controversial?". USA Today. Retrieved 16 November 2023.
- ^ "Copia archivada". Archived from the original on 19 November 2015. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
- ^ "Francia y España esperan reconteo de votos en Venezuela". El Tiempo (in Spanish). 2013-04-15. Retrieved 2024-02-19.
- ^ "EEUU considera 'prudente y necesario' recuento de votos en Venezuela". El Nuevo Herald. 2013-04-18. Archived from the original on 2013-04-18. Retrieved 2024-02-19.
- ^ "Gobierno pide recuento de votos en Venezuela - Nacionales - ABC Color". ABC (Paraguay) (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-02-19.
- ^ "Copia archivada". Archived from the original on 27 June 2013. Retrieved 15 November 2018.
- ^ http://www.antena3.com/noticias/mundo/rector-cne-solicita-auditoria-100-papeletas-que-maduro-acepta_2013041500020.html
- ^ "Maduro aceptó auditoría del 100% de las urnas". DiarioRepublica.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-02-19.
- ^ Scharfenberg, Ewald (2013-04-28). "Venezuela rechaza el recuento de votos que exige la oposición". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
- ^ Administrator. "CNE rechaza realizar la auditoría en los términos de Capriles". urbeguayana.com (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
- ^ "Lucena: Es imposible realizar la auditoría en los términos planteados - Elecciones 2013 - EL UNIVERSAL". www.eluniversal.com. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
- ^ Scharfenberg, Ewald (1 May 2013). "La violencia irrumpe en la Asamblea Nacional de Venezuela". Retrieved 15 November 2018.
- ^ Meza, Alfredo (1 May 2013). "La violencia se apodera del Parlamento de Venezuela". El País. Retrieved 15 November 2018.
- ^ "CNE: Se hará auditoría de verificación al 46% de cajas no auditadas". El Universal (in Spanish). 2022-06-27. Archived from the original on 22 April 2013. Retrieved 2024-02-20.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link) - ^ "Capriles: Rectores del CNE se pagaron y se dieron el vuelto". El Universal. 2013. Retrieved 17 June 2013.[dead link]
- ^ El Universal (7 August 2013). "Elecciones 2013 TSJ desechó las impugnaciones contra comicios del 14A" (in Spanish). Retrieved 7 August 2013.
- ^ "Pelea de diputados en la Asamblea Nacional de Venezuela". BBC. 1 May 2013. Retrieved 15 November 2018.
- ^ "Una pelea en la Asamblea Nacional de Venezuela deja varios diputados heridos". Público. 1 May 2013. Retrieved 15 November 2018.
- ^ Meza, Alfredo (1 May 2013). "La violencia se apodera del Parlamento de Venezuela". El País. Retrieved 15 November 2018.
- ^ Scharfenberg, Ewald (1 May 2013). "La violencia irrumpe en la Asamblea Nacional de Venezuela". Retrieved 15 November 2018.
- ^ Castillo, Mariano (2013-07-27). "A 'birther' movement rises in Venezuela". CNN. Retrieved 2023-11-20.
So far, Venezuela's birther movement also has found no evidence to back their claims, much like their American counterparts. But, in another similarity, they stubbornly refuse to back down.
- ^ Delgado, Antonio María (20 March 2014). "Estudio concluye que Maduro nació en Bogotá". El Nuevo Herald. Archived from the original on 11 May 2018. Retrieved 10 May 2018.
- ^ "Venezuela: Pres. Maduro opponents fan flames of birther debate". Associated Press. 2016-10-25. Retrieved 2023-11-20.
A birther debate is heating up in Venezuela as President Nicolas Maduro's opponents seek to push the embattled socialist leader from office at any cost. Like the birther controversy surrounding Barack Obama in the U.S., the lack of any evidence hasn't stopped his opponents from speculating.
- ^ "Afirman tener pruebas de que Maduro es colombiano". Noticias RCN. 29 July 2013. Archived from the original on 11 May 2018. Retrieved 10 May 2018.
- ^ "Machado: Ya van 4 parroquias donde nació Nicolás Maduro". Informe21. 10 October 2013. Archived from the original on 11 May 2018. Retrieved 10 May 2018.
- ^ a b "TSJ contradice a Maduro y resuelve el misterio de su nacionalidad". El Nacional. 28 October 2016. Archived from the original on 11 May 2018. Retrieved 10 May 2018.
- ^ "Maduro is Venezuelan, top court rules". Reuters. 2016-10-28. Retrieved 2023-11-22.
- ^ Peñaloza, Pedro Pablo (29 October 2016). "¿Dónde nació Nicolás Maduro? El Supremo de Venezuela contradice la autobiografía del mandatario". Univisión Noticias. Archived from the original on 11 May 2018. Retrieved 10 May 2018.
- ^ "TSJ en el exilio decreta nulidad de elección de Maduro como presidente". Diario las Américas. 11 January 2018. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 16 January 2018.
- ^ "Detailed findings of the independent international fact-finding mission on the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela" (PDF). United Nations Human Rights Council. 15 September 2020. p. 14.
In January 2014, in a context of economic decline, inflation and widespread insecurity in the country, a group of opposition leaders initiated a campaign to remove President Nicolás Maduro from office. The effort was referred to as "The Exit" ("La Salida").
- ^ Bellaviti, Sean (May 2021). "La Hora de la Salsa : Nicolás Maduro and the Political Dimensions of Salsa in Venezuela". Journal of Latin American Studies. 53 (2): 373–396. doi:10.1017/S0022216X21000237. S2CID 233668765.
Dubbed 'La Salida' (The Exit) by members of the opposition who called for Maduro's ousting
- ^ "Venezuela protest death toll rises to 13". Al Jazeera. 24 February 2014. Retrieved 30 October 2023.
a nationwide effort called 'la Salida' or 'the Exit,' aimed at ending Maduro's rule.
- ^ Kobelinsky, Fernanda (18 February 2017). "La historia detrás de la detención de Leopoldo López: sus horas previas, por qué se entregó y la sorprendente oferta de Maduro". Infobae (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-11-03.
- ^ Casey, Nicholas; Torres, Patricia (30 March 2017). "Venezuela Muzzles Legislature, Moving Closer to One-Man Rule". The New York Times. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
- ^ "Venezuela's Lame-Duck Congress Names New Supreme Court Justices". Bloomberg. 23 December 2015. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
- ^ a b "Suspenden recolección de firmas para convocar a referendo en Venezuela". El Tiempo. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ a b "Se agrava la crisis entre poderes en Venezuela". El Tiempo. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ a b "Asamblea declara 'ruptura del orden constitucional' en Venezuela". El Tiempo. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ "Con suspensión de referendo, Nicolás Maduro instala 'autocracia'". El Tiempo. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ "'En Venezuela se dio un golpe de Estado': Henrique Capriles". El Tiempo. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ "Luis Almagro denuncia 'rompimiento democrático' en Venezuela". El Tiempo. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ "Colombia y 11 países muestran preocupación por la crisis en Venezuela". El Tiempo. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ "Asamblea venezolana debate llevar a Maduro a un juicio político". El Tiempo. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ "En qué consiste el control político a Maduro, aprobado por la Asamblea". El Espectador. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- ^ "Por qué la Asamblea Nacional de Venezuela no puede hacer al presidente Nicolás Maduro un "impeachment" como el de Dilma Rousseff en Brasil". BBC. Retrieved 27 October 2016.
- ^ "TSJ ordenó excluir a la MUD del proceso de validación". EFE. El Nacional. 25 January 2018. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
- ^ "207° y 158°". Tribunal Supremo de Justicia de Venezuela. Archived from the original on 22 March 2019. Retrieved 8 March 2018.
- ^ WEB, EL NACIONAL (18 January 2018). "Ramos Allup se medirá en las elecciones primarias de la oposición". El Nacional (in Spanish). Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ WEB, EL NACIONAL (23 January 2018). "Ramos Allup: Las primarias son la forma más democrática". El Nacional (in Spanish). Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ NEDERR, SOFÍA NEDERR (24 January 2018). "ANC adelanta elecciones presidenciales mientras oposición llama a la unidad". El Nacional. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ "Oposición venezolana pide postergar las elecciones presidenciales". Analitica.com. 28 January 2018. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ web, Chenoticias. "MUD pide postergar las presidenciales". Chenoticias. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ Web, El Nacional (21 February 2018). "MUD no participará en elecciones presidenciales del 22-A". El Nacional. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ Redacción (21 February 2018). "La MUD anuncia que no participará en las presidenciales de Venezuela y Maduro dice que quiere "megaelección" que incluya parlamentarias y locales". BBC Mundo. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
- ^ Rodríguez Rosas, Ronny (24 April 2018). "Las 10 irregularidades de los comicios del #20Mayo". Efecto Cocuyo. Archived from the original on 25 April 2018.
- ^ León, Ibis (2 May 2018). "Lucena contradice a candidatos y asegura que acuerdo de garantías se cumple". Efecto Cocuyo. Archived from the original on 3 May 2018.
- ^ "Maduro promete ser el "protector" de Amazonas y "golpear" a las mafias de la gasolina". Efecto Cocuyo. 8 May 2018. Archived from the original on 8 May 2018.
- ^ "Henri Falcón: Hay que hacer nuevas elecciones en Venezuela". Panorama. Archived from the original on 21 May 2018. Retrieved 21 May 2018.
- ^ Rodríguez Rosas, Ronny (20 May 2018). "Rector Luis Emilio Rondón desconoce resultados de elecciones presidenciales". Efecto Cocuyo. Archived from the original on 27 May 2018. Retrieved 21 May 2018.
- ^ "Asamblea Nacional aprobó un acuerdo para "reiterar el desconocimiento de la farsa" del 20M". Panorama. 22 May 2018. Archived from the original on 25 May 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2018.
- ^ "Parlamento Europeo rechaza las elecciones presidenciales por considerarlas "fraudulentas"". La Patilla (in European Spanish). 8 February 2018. Retrieved 10 February 2018.
- ^ "Eurocámara pide la suspensión inmediata del proceso ilegítimo del #20May en Venezuela". La Patilla (in European Spanish). 3 May 2018. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
- ^ • Martín, Sabrina (8 February 2018). "Unión Europea prepara nuevas sanciones contra la dictadura en Venezuela y la estatal PDVSA". Panam Post. Archived from the original on 4 January 2019. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
- Web, El Nacional (23 February 2018). "Estos países votaron a favor de la resolución de la OEA sobre Venezuela". El Nacional. Retrieved 21 May 2018.
- EFE (23 February 2018). "La OEA insta a Maduro a cancelar las elecciones presidenciales de abril". El Nacional. Retrieved 21 May 2018.
- Wyss, Jim (7 February 2018). "Solo el 29% de los venezolanos planea votar en las elecciones presidenciales". El Nuevo Herald. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
- ^ "Seis países reunidos por G-20 desconocen el proceso ilegítimo de Venezuela". La Patilla (in European Spanish). 21 May 2018. Retrieved 21 May 2018.
- ^ "Asamblea Nacional arranca proceso para Ley de Transicion". Archived from the original on 9 January 2019. Retrieved 11 March 2019.
- ^ Smith, Scott (10 January 2019). "Isolation greets Maduro's new term as Venezuela's president". AP News. Archived from the original on 11 January 2019. Retrieved 11 January 2019.
- ^ a b Neumann, William (2022). Things are never so bad that they can't get worse: inside the collapse of Venezuela. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press. pp. 211–217. ISBN 9781250266163.
- ^ "Guaidó aboga por un gobierno de transición y elecciones libres en Venezuela". Europa Press (in Spanish). 2019-01-25. Retrieved 2023-11-22.
- ^ "Qué significa el fin del "gobierno" de Juan Guaidó y cómo queda ahora la oposición a Maduro en Venezuela". BBC News Mundo (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-11-22.
- ^ ""Me habría gustado escuchar a presidentes como Lula y Petro ponerse del lado de las víctimas": Juan Guaidó". NTN24 (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-11-22.
- ^ Arellano, María Angela (2022-12-31). "Juan Guaidó: momentos que marcaron su interinato". Runrunes (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-11-22.
- ^ Suarez, Enrique (2021-08-02). "Guaidó: El cese de la usurpación, gobierno de transición y elecciones libres sigue siendo nuestra bandera #2Ago". El Impulso (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-11-22.
- ^ Villa, Rafael Duarte (2022). "Venezuelan military: a political and ideological model in Chavista governments" (PDF). Defence Studies. 22 (1): 79–98. doi:10.1080/14702436.2021.1976061. S2CID 246801363. EBSCOhost 155858391. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2023.
- ^ • "Venezuela Crisis: Guaidó Calls for Uprising as Clashes Erupt". The New York Times. 30 April 2019. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
Venezuelan military personnel who had participated in the coup attempt had since sought asylum in the Brazilian Embassy in Caracas
- Fox, Michael (2 May 2019). "Once Again, Mainstream Media Get It Wrong on Venezuela". The Nation. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
Foreign outlets, dutifully supporting Trump administration calls for regime change, reported that a widespread uprising was underway, even though Juan Guaidó's coup attempt had little support.
- Riley-Smith, Ben; Herbert, Samantha (1 May 2019). "Maduro vows retaliation for coup attempt as he denies attempts to flee to Cuba". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
- "Here's what Barr left out in his summary of Mueller's findings". NBC News. 1 May 2019. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
If it walks like a coup and quacks like a coup, then it sure looks a coup – backed by the Trump administration. ... Juan Guaido, flanked by his political mentor Leopoldo Lopez and a handful of soldiers who had broken ranks, issued a message to Venezuela and the world: The time to topple Nicolas Maduro's authoritarian regime was right now
- "Maduro rallies troops against 'traitors' – DW – 05/02/2019". Deutsche Welle. 2 May 2019. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro sought to rally the military on Thursday in the wake of an unsuccessful coup against him.
- Christofaro, Beatrice; Baker, Sinéad (30 April 2019). "A timeline of the political crisis in Venezuela, which began with claims of election rigging and has now led to an attempted military coup". Business Insider. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
- "May Day street clashes in Paris fuelled by widening anti-Macron coalition". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 1 May 2019. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
Defiant Maduro claims victory over Guaido coup attempt
- Fox, Michael (2 May 2019). "Once Again, Mainstream Media Get It Wrong on Venezuela". The Nation. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
- ^ • "Venezuelans take to streets as uprising attempt sputters". Associated Press. 2021-04-20. Retrieved 2023-06-04.
- "Venezuela arrests over 'uprising attempt'". BBC News. 2017-08-06. Retrieved 2023-06-04.
- "Photos From Venezuela: A Protest Turns Violent". The New York Times. 2019-04-30. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2023-06-04.
- "Russian army helping Venezuela amid US 'threats': Moscow's ambassador". France 24. 2019-05-24. Retrieved 2023-06-04.
- ^ "Leopoldo López y su familia ingresaron como huéspedes a la residencia del embajador de Chile". La Patilla (in European Spanish). 30 April 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
- ^ Sequera, Vivian and Angus Berwick (30 April 2019). "Venezuela's Guaido calls on troops to join him in uprising against Maduro". Reuters. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
- ^ Armas, Mayela (2022-12-31). "Venezuela opposition removes interim President Guaido". Reuters. Retrieved 2022-12-31.
- ^ Martínez, Deisy (2022-12-30). "AN de 2015 aprueba su extensión por otro año y elimina gobierno interino" [2015 NA approves its extension for one more year and eliminates interim government]. Efecto Cocuyo (in Spanish). Retrieved 2022-12-31.
- ^ "Mayoría de la AN-2015 ratifica disolución del Gobierno interino". Tal Cual (in Spanish). 2022-12-30. Retrieved 2022-12-31.
Hemos tenido algo que pasó de ser provisional a convertirse en algo perpetuo. Y no se celebraron las elecciones, de manera que el artículo 233 perdió su razón de ser para justificar el gobierno interino.
- ^ "27 partidos de oposición de Venezuela descartan competir en elecciones parlamentaria y denuncian fraude electoral". CNN (in Spanish). 2020-08-03. Retrieved 2022-01-19.
- ^ Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. "El Supremo venezolano suspende la intervención judicial de Primero Justicia | DW | 04.09.2020". DW.COM (in European Spanish). Retrieved 2022-01-19.
- ^ "La oposición venezolana rechaza las intervenciones judiciales de sus partidos". www.efe.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 2022-01-19.
- ^ "El Partido Comunista de Venezuela rompe con Maduro | Ex-Ante". www.ex-ante.cl (in Spanish). 2020-11-19. Retrieved 2022-01-19.
- ^ "Candidata de la APR en Mérida amenazada de muerte". La Izquierda Diario (in Spanish). 2 October 2020. Retrieved 7 November 2020.
- ^ Moleiro, Alonso; Singer, Florantonia (2022-01-25). "La inviable activación del revocatorio contra Nicolás Maduro". El País. Retrieved 2022-01-26.
- ^ a b Garcia Cano, Regina (26 October 2023). "María Corina Machado is winner of Venezuela opposition primary that the government has denounced". Associated Press News. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
- ^ Armas, Mayela; Sequera, Vivian (30 June 2023). "Venezuela opposition candidate Machado barred from holding office-gov't". Reuters. Retrieved 30 June 2023.
- ^ Perdomo, Luna (30 June 2023). "José Brito: Contraloría inhabilitó a María Corina Machado por 15 años" [José Brito: Comptroller's Office disqualified María Corina Machado for 15 years]. Tal Cual (in Spanish). Retrieved 10 July 2023.
- ^ Rodríguez, Ronny (30 June 2023). "Contraloría inhabilita a María Corina Machado por 15 años, dice José Brito" [Comptroller's Office disqualifies María Corina Machado for 15 years, says José Brito]. Efecto Cocuyo (in Spanish). Retrieved 10 July 2023.
- ^ "Alerta: hay una operación de influencia en contra de @MariaCorinaYA en curso. (...)". Twitter (in Spanish). 10 July 2023. Retrieved 26 July 2023.
- ^ "Urgente: ELN amenaza de muerte a María Corina Machado en Venezuela: le exigen que se aparte de las elecciones primarias". Semana (in Spanish). 22 July 2023. Retrieved 26 July 2023.
- ^ "La Fiscalía investigará amenazas de muerte contra Delsa Solórzano". El Nacional. 14 August 2023. Retrieved 6 September 2023.
- ^ Fray, Keith; Daniels, Joe; Silva, Vanessa; Stott, Michael (2023-03-05). "How Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro outfoxed the west". Financial Times. Retrieved 2023-11-15.
- ^ a b c Andrade, Gabriel (1 December 2020). "Banal Nationalism Disputes in Venezuela: 1999–2019". Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics. 14 (2). De Gruyter: 182–184. doi:10.2478/jnmlp-2020-0007. S2CID 229450851.
- ^ a b Morsbach, Greg (March 13, 2006). "New Venezuela flag divides nation". BBC News. Retrieved September 19, 2010.
- ^ a b "The Week" (PDF). National Review. 20 September 2010. p. 14.
- ^ El movimiento de las manos blancas (PDF). Los Andes University. 2008. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
- ^ Itriago, Andreina (2017-05-29). "Yon Goicoechea: "Espero recuperar mi libertad pronto, junto al resto de los venezolanos"". El Mundo (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-11-25.
- ^ "De las boinas azules, a las capuchas y a las manos blancas". Observatorio Hannah Arendt. Retrieved 2023-11-25.
- ^ "La gorra de la polémica" (in Spanish). El Mundo. 3 October 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2023.