Lourinhasaurus is an extinct genus of herbivorous sauropod dinosaur genus dating from Late Jurassic strata of Estremadura, Portugal. The genus is monotypic, containing one species, Lourinhasaurus alenquerensis. The type specimen for this species was discovered near the town of Alenquer, near an abandoned mill.[1][2] The specimen is housed at the Geological Museum of Lisbon.
Lourinhasaurus Temporal range: Late Jurassic (early Tithonian),
| |
---|---|
Life reconstruction. | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Clade: | Dinosauria |
Clade: | Saurischia |
Clade: | †Sauropodomorpha |
Clade: | †Sauropoda |
Clade: | †Macronaria |
Family: | †Camarasauridae |
Genus: | †Lourinhasaurus Dantas et al., 1998 |
Species: | †L. alenquerensis
|
Binomial name | |
†Lourinhasaurus alenquerensis (Lapparent & Zbyszewski, 1957)
| |
Synonyms | |
|
The research history of Lourinhasaurus is not without controversies, with referred specimens later being interpreted as not belonging to the genus (such as the type specimen of Supersaurus (=Dinheirosaurus) lourinhanensis). Lourinhasaurus means "lizard from Lourinhã" literally translated, despite the fact that the type specimen wasn't wasn't found in the Lourinhã municipality.
Discovery
editIn June 1949 a partial skeleton of a large sauropod, found by American geologist Harold Weston Robbins, was excavated in a locality near Alenquer.[3][1] The excavations at the locality, thereafter referred to as Moinho do Carmo quarry,[2] were conducted by the geological Services of Portugal, under the direction of Georges Zbyszewski.[1] The locality lies within the Sobral Formation (a lateral equivalent to the Porto Novo and Praia Azul Members of the Lourinhã Formation), a sequence of rocks deposited in a estuarine delta complex context, dated from the early Tithonian.[2] The specimen, which preserved more than 26 vertebrae, dorsal ribs and much of the appendicular skeleton (minus the hands and feet), probably represents a single individual and constitutes the most complete sauropod skeleton found in Portugal thus far.[2] In 1957, Albert-Félix de Lapparent and Georges Zbyszewski published their work on the Portuguese vertebrate fauna, "Les dinosauriens du Portugal", wherein they erect a new Apatosaurus species, Apatosaurus alenquerensis, based on the Moinho do Carmo specimen, as well as well as on a caudal vertebrae series found at S. Bernardino (Peniche), and other fragmentary specimens. The specific name alenquerensis refers to the locality of Alenquer.[1]
In 1983, another partial skeleton of a sauropod dinosaur was discovered at the Porto Dinheiro (Lourinhã). The skeleton was excavated in 1987, 1991 and 1992 by members of the Lourinhã Museum, the National Museum of Natural History and Science, Lisbon and the University of Salamanca. It was discovered in layers of the Praia da Amoreira-Porto Novo Member of the Lourinhã Formation, dated from the late Kimmeridgian, and therefore slightly older than the Moinho do Carmo specimen.The skeleton is composed of nine neural spines, 12 complete posterior cervical and dorsal vertebrae, 12 dorsal ribs from both sides of the animal and other fragmentary material from the appendicular skeleton. Furthermore, one tooth and gastroliths were found in association with the specimen.[4][5] In 1998, Pedro Dantas and colleagues publish their work on the Porto Dinheiro specimen, that they interpreted as being the same species as the Moinho do Carmo specimen. They propose the combinatio nova Lourinhasaurus alenquerensis, and emend the diagnosis for the taxon,[5] although mostly based on the Porto Dinheiro specimen.[2] They don't appoint a type specimen.[6] The new generic name refers to the locality of the Porto Dinheiro specimen, which lies within the Lourinhã municipality.[5] Just a year later, however, the Porto Dinheiro specimen was reinterpreted as a diplodocid, and given the new name Dinheirosaurus lourinhanensis. The authors of this work still suggest the Moinho do Carmo specimen represents a new species[7]
It was not until 2003 that the Moinho do Carmo specimen was appointed as the lectotype for Lourinhasaurus alenquerensis.[6] In 2014, Mocho and colleagues published a complete re-description of the Moinho do Carmo specimen, including elements never described before, and also provided a phylogenetic revision of Lourinhasaurus. They recovered Lourinhasaurus alenquerensis as a valid genus, closely related to Camarasaurus, a sauropod genus from the Late Jurassic Morrisson Formation.[2] The other partial specimens that Albert-Félix de Lapparent and Georges Zbyszewski referred to Apatosaurus alenquerensis, such as the caudal vertebrae series from São Bernardino, are no longer attributed to Lourinhasaurus alenquerensis, instead being considered indeterminate remains.[8]
Description
editLourinhasaurus alenquerensis is a large herbivorous dinosaur, closely related to Camarasaurus.[2][9][10][11] It has some notable features in its skeleton, such as the ventral concavity in the anterior-to-middle dorsal vertebrae, the very tall sacral neural spines, a posteriorly oriented postacetabular process of the ilium, tibia and fibula of equal length, a marked lateral deflection of the femoral shaft (without the lateral bulge commonly seen in titanosaurs), among others.[2] The higher humerus/femur length ratio of Lourinhasaurus, pointed by John Stanton McIntosh, might've suggested a slightly more verticalized posture compared to Camarasaurus.[2][9][10] Gregory S. Paul suggested Lourinhasaurus alenquerensis measured 18 metres (59 ft) in length and weighted around 5 metric tons (5.5 short tons).[12]
Classification
editUpon its original description, the Moinho do Carmo specimen was considered a species of Apatosaurus.[1] The attribution of this species to Apatosaurus was subsequently questioned. In 1970 Rodney Steel renamed it Atlantosaurus alenquerensis,[13] and in 1978 George Olshevsky coined proposed the name Brontosaurus alenquerensis.[14] Notably, John Stanton McIntosh in 1990 proposed for the first time that the Moinho do Carmo specimen represented a new species with close affinity to Camarasaurus. He published a new taxonomic framework for the skeleton, basing his assertion on the opisthocoelic dorsal vertebrae, the broadly expanded distal scapular blade, the long and slender humerus, and the unexpanded distal ends of the ischia that the specimen shares with Camarasaurus. The authors proposed Camarasaurus alenquerensis as a provisory assignation for the specimen.[9][10][11] McIntosh later suggested the possibility that the skeleton might represent its own genus, based on the higher humerus/femur length ratio compared to Camarasaurus.[10][11] In the following years, Lourinhasaurus had been considered a basal eusauropod,[15] a non-macronarian neosauropod,[16][17] a basal macronarian,[18][19] and even a form related to Laurasiaformes.[20][21]
It wasn't until 2014, with the full re-description of the specimen published by Mocho and colleagues, that the phylogenetic relationships of the specimen were cleared out. The phylogenetic hypotheses proposed by that work suggest that Lourinhasaurus is a basal member of the Macronaria closely related to Camarasaurus, in agreement with McIntosh's earlier views. This study recovered, for the first time in a cladistic analysis, Camarasauridae as a monophyletic clade, including Camarasaurus, Lourinhasaurus and Tehuelchesaurus.[2]
Mocho et al. 2014 strict consensus cladogram obtained from Wilson’s (2002) data matrix.[2]
References
edit- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e Lapparent, A.F. de; & Zbyszewski, G. 1957: Les dinosauriens de Portugal. Memórias dos Serviços Geológicos de Portugal 2: 1-63
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k Mocho, P., Royo-Torres, R. and Ortega, F., 2014, "Phylogenetic reassessment of Lourinhasaurus alenquerensis, a basal Macronaria (Sauropoda) from the Upper Jurassic of Portugal", Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 170: 875–916
- ^ A.F. de Lapparent & G. Zbyszewski, 1951, "Découverte d'une riche faune de Reptiles Dinosauriens dans le Jurassique supérieur du Portugal", Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences à Paris 233: 1125-1127
- ^ Dantas, PM; Sanz, JL; Galopim de Carvalho, AM (1992). "Dinossáurio da Praia de Porto Dinheiro (dados preliminares)". Gaia. 5: 31–35.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Dantas, P; Sanz, JL; Silva, CM; Ortega, F; Santos, VF; Cachão, M (1998). "Lourinhasaurus n. gen. novo dinossáurio saurópode do Jurássico superior (Kimeridgiano superior-Titoniano inferior) de Portugal". Comunicações do Instituto Geológico e Mineiro. 84: 91–94.
- ^ Jump up to: a b Antunes, M.T.; & Mateus, O. 2003: Dinosaurs of Portugal. Comptes Rendus Palevol 2(1): 77-96
- ^ Bonaparte, José F.; Mateus, Octávio (1999-01-01). "A new diplodocid, Dinheirosaurus lourinhanensis gen. et sp. nov., from the Late Jurassic beds of Portugal". Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales. 5: 13–29.
- ^ Mocho, P., Royo-Torres, R., Malafaia, E., Escaso, F., & Ortega, F. (2016). Systematic review of Late Jurassic sauropods from the Museu Geológico collections (Lisboa, Portugal). Journal of Iberian Geology, 42, 227–250. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_JIGE.2016.v42.n2.52177
- ^ Jump up to: a b c McIntosh JS. 1990. Species determination in sauropod dinosaurs with tentative suggestions for their classification. In: Carpenter K, Currie PJ, eds. Dinosaur systematics: approaches and perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–69.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c d McIntosh JS. 1990. Sauropoda. In: Wheishampell DB, Dodson P, Osmólska H, eds. The Dinosauria. Berekeley, CA: University of California Press, 345–401.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c McIntosh, JS; Miller, WE; Stadtman, KL; Gillette, DD (1996). "The osteology of Camarasaurus lewisi (Jensen, 1988)". Brigham Young University Geology Studies. 41: 73–115.
- ^ Paul, Gregory S. (2016). The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs. Princeton University Press. p. 214. ISBN 978-1-78684-190-2. OCLC 985402380.
- ^ Steel, Rodney (1970). Saurischia. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag
- ^ Olshevsky, G., 1978, "The Archosaurian Taxa (excluding the Crocodylia)", In: Mesozoic Meanderings 1, pp. 1–50
- ^ Upchurch P, Barrett PM, Dodson P. 2004. Sauropoda. In: Weishampel DB, Dodson P, Osmólska H, eds. The Dinosauria II. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 259–322.
- ^ Royo-Torres R, Upchurch P. 2012. The cranial anatomy of the sauropod Turiasaurus riodevensis and implications for its phylogenetic relationships. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 10: 553–583.
- ^ Alcalá L, Cobos A, Delclòs X, Luque L, Mampel L, RoyoTorres R, Soriano C. 2009. Mesozoic terrestrial ecosystems in Teruel. In: Alcalá L, Royo-Torres R, eds. Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems in Eastern Spain ¡Fundamental! 14: 94–130.
- ^ Royo-Torres R, Cobos A, Alcalá L. 2006. A giant European dinosaur and a new sauropod clade. Science 314: 19251927.
- ^ Barco JL. 2010. Implicaciones filogenéticas y paleobiogeográficas del saurópodo Galvesaurus herreroi Barco, Canudo. Cuenca-Bescós y Ruiz-Omeñaca 2005. Libro de Resúmenes V Jornadas Internacionales sobre Paleontología de Dinosaurios y su Entorno Salas de los Infantes, Burgos.
- ^ Royo-Torres R, Cobos A, Luque L, Aberasturi A, Espílez E, Fierro I, González A, Mampel L, Alcalá L. 2009. High European sauropod dinosaur diversity during Jurassic-Cretaceous transition in Riodeva (Teruel, Spain). Palaeontology 52: 1009–1027.
- ^ Royo-Torres R, Alcalá L, Cobos A. 2012. A new specimen of the Cretaceous sauropod Tastavinsaurus sanzi from El Castellar (Teruel, Spain), and a phylogenetic analysis of the Laurasiformes. Cretaceous Research 34: 61–83.