- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it.
The result was to delete the image.
 | This orphaned talk page, subpage, image page, or similar is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G8 as it has been asserted to be useful to Wikipedia. If you believe it should be deleted, please nominate it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. |
It is a recent photograph from actors own Instagram, released to the public. I believe it is fair use for us to use, as he uploaded it online for the world to see himself.
- We already have two freely licensed images, so this photo fails WP:NFCC #1. Sorry, -- Diannaa (talk) 01:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.
- @Diannaa. Where are the two free images? I did a search and found quite a few pictures of similar angle as current picture from five years ago. But has there been a more recent free upload? What website would you suggest has free images that we could use with no problem? (for more recent photographs as it needs updating) Charlr6 (talk) 12:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, the non-free content policy is quite strict. There's two free images already in the article. Exceptions are not made in cases where the photos are starting to get old. The best place to hunt for free images is Flickr. -- Diannaa (talk) 13:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Diannaa Just to confirm, the original photo was from Instagram, and is that, even though images released to the public, considered 'copyrighted'? As the only reason I did originally put it was just to be safe. I'll have a look on Flickr then for a more recent image that can be used in the main info boxCharlr6 (talk) 14:13, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Under the terms of the Berne Convention, all photos (and prose) are automatically deemed to be copyright as soon as they are created. No registration or official documentation is needed to make it so. Posting a photo online or releasing it to the public in some other way (in print media, for example) does not mean that an image is no longer under copyright. -- Diannaa (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Diannaa Just to confirm, the original photo was from Instagram, and is that, even though images released to the public, considered 'copyrighted'? As the only reason I did originally put it was just to be safe. I'll have a look on Flickr then for a more recent image that can be used in the main info boxCharlr6 (talk) 14:13, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, the non-free content policy is quite strict. There's two free images already in the article. Exceptions are not made in cases where the photos are starting to get old. The best place to hunt for free images is Flickr. -- Diannaa (talk) 13:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Diannaa. Where are the two free images? I did a search and found quite a few pictures of similar angle as current picture from five years ago. But has there been a more recent free upload? What website would you suggest has free images that we could use with no problem? (for more recent photographs as it needs updating) Charlr6 (talk) 12:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
