It is Hippocamelus antisensis; no is a Hippocamelus bisulcus. CHUCAO (talk) 08:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- How do you know? In [1] it appears that the person who actually took the photo is pointing out that it is "almost certainly Hippocamelus bisulcus, and not H. antisensis". Now you are claiming the opposite. Shouting "NO" and adding five exclamation marks is no proof, so please provide some evidence to support your claim. --Jmk (talk) 09:04, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- I understand that the place where the photograph was taken is in Peru (in the Pampa Galeras National Reserve), or Putre in northern Chile, near the border with Peru, both in full Hippocamelus antisensis distribution, and thousands of miles north of the closest Hippocamelus bisulcus. The arid habitats can be observed, the grayish color of the coat, the slimmer shape of your body, the antlers split from the crown, etc. Hug. CHUCAO (talk) 12:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. Yes, I took the photo on the road out of Putre that leads into the Lauca National Park. So I guess, given your distribution information, that I was wrong about it "almost certainly" being H. bisculus. Sorry for any confusion. 81.159.165.229 (talk) 12:32, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
