File talk:Cervical mucus1.jpg

err

This picture is unnecessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.139.85.158 (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Total disgusting

I do not believe this picture is nessary to the article, NOBODY NEEDS TO KNOW WHAT CERVICAL MUCUS LOOKS LIKE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.25.14 (talk) 13:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't believe that is disgusting by far, especially if an individual such as I desire to know more information regarding cervical muscus. I would never have equated the look of this type of muscus with my being fertile. It was very informative and I thank whomever posted the photo. Information that I received yesterday from my Dr. and this photo has heighten my awareness of knowing my boby, just a little bit better. Thank you.Mbraced (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)mbraced

boby 134.173.202.183 (talk) 06:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Very Interesting

I think this picture is not disgusting. If you have respect for the human body and seek to learn everything about it then this picture is valuable. It does not need to be viewed as disgusting it is all part of life, and there are many woman that may think there is something wrong with them if they do not have a place to look for answers without feeling shame or embarrassment. Well done Wikipedia, your information is thorough and comprehensive. Thank you. Tjubtjub (talk) 07:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Tjubtjub

It's gross. You can respect the body and still accept that it's nasty, I think shit and snot are nasty too.

Wikipedia supposedly is not censored. --81.96.173.9 (talk) 18:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

This isn't cervical mucus, it is nasal mucus. Please correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.191.64 (talk) 21:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)