The image depicts 'a logo' as it appeared on Topps packaging. I make no claim that it is 'an official logo'. According to Webster's Dictionary logo is defined as 'an identifying statement'. Therefore this image qualifies as 'a Topps logo' on account it was used to identify a Topps product in the 1950s. Libro0 (talk) 22:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- This is not the company logo. End of discussion. This is just an attempt to bait me by problem user Libro0. Baseball Card Guy (talk) 00:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Discussion resumed. The documentation makes no statement indicating that it is 'the official company logo'. It has been identified as being used on Topps packaging. Libro0 (talk) 18:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- It is not a logo. End of discussion. What the hell don't you understand? Stop it! Baseball Card Guy (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Logo - stylized text - branding - insignia - emblem - moniker - call it whatever you want, it is the 'brand name' as it appeared on the company's product. Libro0 (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
This is not a logo! Stop vandalizing the 1950s Topps page with this image which is a copyright violation. Baseball Card Guy (talk) 12:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
