Submission declined on 6 March 2024 by DMacks (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 6 January 2024 by Dcotos (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Dcotos 8 months ago. | ![]() |
Comment: Re-submitting an unchanged draft will lead to re-rejection. Please address the noted concerns. DMacks (talk) 10:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Please wait for clarity before writing on breaking news. Early coverage is often speculative, allegation newss are not factual as per WP:DELAY, WP:SENSATIONAL. Dcotos (talk) 11:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The alleged scam was discovered in August 2023 when it was discovered that certain medical professionals and employees at seven Mohalla Clinics in the South-West, Shahdara, and North-East districts were using unethical methods to record patient attendance. Payments have allegedly been given to private laboratories in response to thousands of fraudulent tests. It is alleged that the scheme involves hundreds of crores.[1][2][3] The investigation report states that the outsourced laboratories recommended up to 20,000 tests, either on "0" digit or blank cell numbers. The scandal, according to the L-G's office, is worth hundreds of crores.[4] The health department's report, which was sent to the lieutenant governor, also stated that patients' registration and purported lab tests were done using fake cellphone numbers.[5][6][7]
There are claims that hundreds of "fake" lab tests have been performed at the neighbourhood clinics established to offer free primary healthcare to Delhi residents.[8][9] This occurs just days after it was revealed that Delhi's state-run hospitals were receiving subpar medication supplies, and the Enforcement Directorate served Arvind Kejriwal with its third summons in connection with the "scam" surrounding the excise policy.[10] In response to the current allegations, Delhi Health Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj stated that they had received a complaint about it on September 20. As a result, 26 medical staff members had their services terminated with a warning of severe consequences.[11]
The Central Bureau of Investigation, has been requested by Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena to look into allegations of corruption made against the AAP-run Mohalla Clinics in Delhi.[12][13][14][15]
References
edit- ^ "Delhi Mohalla Clinic 'Scam' Gets Murkier with New Findings on 'Fake Lab Tests'; Health Minister Reacts". News18. 2024-01-04. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Service, Statesman News (2024-01-04). "Delhi LG recommends CBI probe into alleged 'fake lab tests' scam in Mohalla Clinics". The Statesman. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Staff, Scroll (2024-01-04). "Delhi lieutenant governor seeks CBI probe into alleged fake lab tests at Mohalla clinics". Scroll.in. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "7 mohalla clinics 'faked' data to test ghost patients: Inquiry". The Indian Express. 2024-01-04. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "Delhi Lt Governor recommends CBI probe into 'fake lab tests' in mohalla clinics". India Today. 4 January 2024. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Livemint (2024-01-04). "Delhi mohalla clinics under scrutiny for 'fake' tests". mint. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Staff, Scroll (2024-01-04). "Delhi lieutenant governor seeks CBI probe into alleged fake lab tests at Mohalla clinics". Scroll.in. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Service, Statesman News (2024-01-04). "Delhi LG recommends CBI probe into alleged 'fake lab tests' scam in Mohalla Clinics". The Statesman. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "Delhi Lt Governor recommends CBI probe into 'fake lab tests' in mohalla clinics". India Today. 4 January 2024. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ ""Fake Tests Scam" Hits AAP: The Mohalla Clinic "Fraud" Explained". NDTV.com. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "Delhi Mohalla Clinic 'Scam' Gets Murkier with New Findings on 'Fake Lab Tests'; Health Minister Reacts". News18. 2024-01-04. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ ""Fake Tests Scam" Hits AAP: The Mohalla Clinic "Fraud" Explained". NDTV.com. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Service, Statesman News (2024-01-04). "Delhi LG recommends CBI probe into alleged 'fake lab tests' scam in Mohalla Clinics". The Statesman. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "Delhi Lt Governor recommends CBI probe into 'fake lab tests' in mohalla clinics". India Today. 4 January 2024. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Livemint (2024-01-04). "Delhi mohalla clinics under scrutiny for 'fake' tests". mint. Retrieved 2024-01-05.