Wikipedia

Dominion theology

(Redirected from Dominion Theology)
Not to be confused with Dominion (political theory).

Dominion theology, also known as dominionism, is a group of Christian political ideologies that seek to institute a nation governed by Christians and based on their understandings of biblical law. Extents of rule and ways of acquiring governing authority are varied. For example, dominion theology can include theonomy but does not necessarily involve advocacy of adherence to the Mosaic Law as the basis of government. The label is primarily applied to groups of Christians in the United States.

Prominent adherents of those ideologies include Calvinist Christian reconstructionism, Charismatic and Pentecostal Kingdom Now theology, and the New Apostolic Reformation.[1][2] Most of the contemporary movements that are labeled dominion theology arose in the 1970s from religious movements asserting aspects of Christian nationalism. Roman Catholic integralism is also sometimes considered to fall under the dominionist umbrella, but the Catholic integralist movement is much older and theologically markedly different from Protestant dominionism since it is tied to the doctrine that the Catholic Church is the only true church.

Etymology

edit

Dominion theology is a reference to the King James Bible's rendering of Genesis 1:28 in which God grants humanity "dominion" over the Earth.

And God blessed them, and God said unto them, "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth."

In the late 1980s, several prominent Evangelical authors[3][4][5][6] used the phrase dominion theology and other terms such as dominionism to label a loose grouping of theological movements that made direct appeals to the passage in Genesis.[7] Christians typically interpret the passage as meaning that God gave mankind responsibility over the Earth, but one of the most distinctive aspects of dominion theology is that it is interpreted as a mandate for Christian stewardship in civil affairs, no less than in other human matters.[8]

Types

edit

Protestant Christian reconstructionism

edit

An example of dominionism in Reformed theology is Christian reconstructionism, which originated in the teachings of R. J. Rushdoony in the 1960s and the 1970s.[9] His theology focuses on theonomy, the rule of the Law of God, and his belief that all of society should be ordered according to the laws that governed the Israelites in the Old Testament. His ideas on biblical law in civil government are laid out most comprehensively in The Institutes of Biblical Law, but he wrote many other books dealing with the subject. Rushdoony's proposed system is strongly Calvinistic by emphasizing the sovereignty of God over human freedom and action, and denying the operation of charismatic gifts in the present day (cessationism). Both of those aspects are in direct opposition to Kingdom Now theology (see below).

Full adherents to reconstructionism are few and marginalized among most Christians.[10][11][12] Dave Hunt,[3] Albert James Dager,[4] Hal Lindsey,[5] and Thomas Ice[6] specifically criticize Christian reconstructionism from a Christian viewpoint and disagree on theological grounds with its theocratic elements as well as its Calvinism and postmillennialism. J. Ligon Duncan,[13] Sherman Isbell,[14] Vern Poythress,[15] Robert Godfrey,[16] and Sinclair Ferguson[17] analyze reconstructionism as conservative Calvinists, primarily giving a theological critique of its theocratic elements. Michael J. McVicar has noted that many leading Christian reconstructionists are also leading writers in paleolibertarian circles.[18]

Some social scientists have used the word dominionism to refer to adherence to Christian reconstructionism.[19][20][21]

Catholic integralism

edit

Catholic integralism has been characterized as a form of dominionist theology, but in reality, it is much older and theologically distinct from the dominionism that is espoused by Protestants.[1][2] Antonio Spadaro and Marcelo Figueroa have said that Catholic integralists have entered into a nontraditional ecumenical alliance with Protestant reconstructionists who share "the same desire for religious influence in the political sphere."[22][23] Likewise, in the National Catholic Reporter, Joshua J. McElwee wrote that Catholic integralists, along with their Protestant counterparts, wish to establish a "theocratic type of state."[24] But ultimately, the goals of Protestant dominionists and Catholic integralists are divergent, as Catholic integralists adhere to the doctrine that the Catholic Church is the "only true church" and that every form of Protestantism is "heretical." That has not prevented cooperation between them, however, when it has been mutually beneficial.

Catholic integralism has a much longer history than the Protestant dominionism that arose in the U.S. in the 1970s and in fact has its root in traditional Catholic doctrine on church-state relations that developed when the governments of Europe were nearly all Catholic confessional states and had Catholicism as their official religion. Such a political conception was referred to as "Christendom" with the summit of political authority held by the Holy Roman Emperor and the summit of spiritual authority held by the Supreme Pontiff (Pope). After the movement toward liberal secularism and disestablishmentarianism, several modern states eventually reacted with a revived integralism, often in a fascistic or proto-fascistic form, such as in Spain under the leadership of Francisco Franco, Portugal under Antonio Salazar, and Austria under Engelbert Dollfuß and his Fatherland Front. Today, only a handful of states remain with Catholicism as the official established religion of state, but there are still movements in other nations and among some in the Catholic hierarchy who support a revival of integralism in states that have become secular.

 
Fatherland Front rally, 1936

In recent years, a "revived Catholic integralism" has been noted among the younger generation of Catholics writing for websites such as The Josias.[25] Integralism could be said to merely be the modern continuation of the traditional Catholic conception of church–state relations elucidated by Pope Gelasius I and expounded upon throughout the centuries until the Syllabus of Errors, which condemned the idea that the separation of church and state is a moral good.[26] For example, some Catholics have praised the actions of Pius IX in the 1858 Mortara case in which he ordered the abduction of a six-year-old Jewish boy who had been baptized without his parents' consent.[27]: 1039–1041  A systematic account of Catholic integralism as a coherent political philosophy has been written by the Catholic theologians Thomas Crean and Alan Fimister: Integralism: a manual of political philosophy.[28]

 
Allegory of the Concordat of 1801, by Pierre Joseph Célestin François

Today, the Catholic Church's political treaties with various countries, known as concordats, are criticized by some liberal and democratic human rights groups for advancing Catholic integralism. More than 200 concordats are in force. Some of them explicitly guarantee that Catholicism is recognized as the official religion of state in several countries and others grant historical recognition of the Catholic faith and grant certain rights and privileges to the Church.

Pentecostal Kingdom Now theology

edit

Kingdom Now theology is a branch of dominion theology that has a following within Pentecostalism and attracted attention in the late 1980s.[29][30]

Kingdom Now theology states that although Satan has been in control of the world since the Fall of Man, God is looking for people who will help him take back dominion. Those who yield themselves to the authority of God's apostles and prophets will take control of the kingdoms of this world, being defined as all social institutions, the "kingdom" of education, the "kingdom" of science, the "kingdom" of the arts, etc.[31] C. Peter Wagner, the founder of the New Apostolic Reformation, writes: "The practical theology that best builds a foundation under social transformation is dominion theology, sometimes called 'Kingdom Now'. Its history can be traced back through R. J. Rushdoony and Abraham Kuyper to John Calvin."[32]

Kingdom Now theology is influenced by the Latter Rain movement,[33] and critics have connected it to the New Apostolic Reformation,[34] "Spiritual Warfare Christianity,"[33] and Fivefold ministry thinking.[35]

Seven Mountains Dominionism, also known as the Seven Mountains Mandate or 7MM, has become a more prevalent manifestation of Kingdom Now theology since the early 2010s. Bill Bright, Loren Cunningham, and Francis Schaeffer are often credited as having been given the same divine vision that revealed the Seven Mountain Mandate in 1975.[36][37] The mandate proposes that there are seven "mountains" that Christians must control to establish a global Christian theocracy and prepare the world for Jesus' return: government, education, media, arts and entertainment, religion, family, and business.[38] The mandate is based on two Biblical passages: Isaiah 2:2-3, which says, "In the last days the mountain of the Lord’s temple will be established as the highest of the mountains," and Revelation 17:1–18, which describes "a scarlet beast... [with] had seven heads and ten horns."[39][40][41] Prominent Christian leaders who support Seven Mountains Dominionism include David Barton, James Dobson, John Hagee, Bill Johnson, Lance Wallnau, and Paula White. Notable politicians who have embraced it include Michele Bachmann, Sam Brownback, Ted Cruz, Newt Gingrich, Mike Huckabee, Charlie Kirk, Sarah Palin, and Rick Perry.[38][42][43][37][44][45]

Kingdom Now theology should not be confused with Kingdom theology, which is related to inaugurated eschatology.

Christian right

edit
Main article: Christian right

In the late 1980s, the sociologist Sara Diamond started to write about the intersection of dominion theology with the political activism of the Christian right.[46][47] Diamond argued that "the primary importance of the [Christian reconstructionist] ideology is its role as a catalyst for what is loosely called 'dominion theology.'" According to Diamond, "Largely through the impact of Rushdoony's and North's writings, the concept that Christians are Biblically mandated to 'occupy' all secular institutions has become the central unifying ideology for the Christian Right" (emphasis in original) in the United States.[46]: 138 

While acknowledging the small number of actual adherents, authors such as Diamond and Frederick Clarkson have argued that postmillennial Christian reconstructionism played a major role in pushing the primarily premillennial Christian right to adopt a more aggressive dominionist stance.[48]

Misztal and Shupe concur with Sara Diamond and Frederick Clarkson by arguing, "Reconstructionists have many more sympathizers who fall somewhere within the dominionist framework, but who are not card-carrying members."[49] According to Diamond, "Reconstructionism is the most intellectually grounded, though esoteric, brand of dominion theology."[48]

The journalist Frederick Clarkson defined dominionism as a movement that includes dominion theology and reconstructionism as subsets but is much broader in scope and extends to much of the Christian right in the United States.[50][51]

In his 1992 study of dominion theology and its influence on the Christian right, Bruce Barron wrote:

In the context of American evangelical efforts to penetrate and transform public life, the distinguishing mark of a dominionist is a commitment to defining and carrying out an approach to building society that is self-consciously defined as exclusively Christian, and dependent specifically on the work of Christians, rather than based on a broader consensus.[52]

In 1995, Diamond called the influence of dominion theology "prevalent on the Christian Right."[53]

The journalist Chip Berlet added in 1998 that although they represent different theological and political ideas, dominionists assert a Christian duty to take "control of a sinful secular society."[54]

In 2005, Clarkson enumerated the following characteristics shared by all forms of dominionism:[55]

  1. Dominionists celebrate Christian nationalism, in that they believe that the United States once was, and should once again be, a Christian nation. In this way, they deny the Enlightenment roots of American democracy.
  2. Dominionists promote religious supremacy, insofar as they generally do not respect the equality of other religions, or even other versions of Christianity.
  3. Dominionists endorse theocratic visions, insofar as they believe that the Ten Commandments, or "biblical law," should be the foundation of American law, and that the U.S. Constitution should be seen as a vehicle for implementing Biblical principles.[55]

The essayist Katherine Yurica began using the term dominionism in her articles in 2004, beginning with "The Despoiling of America" (February 11, 2004).[56][57][self-published source?][58] Authors who also use the term dominionism in the broader sense include the journalist Chris Hedges,[59][60][61] Marion Maddox,[62] James Rudin,[63] Michelle Goldberg,[64][65] Kevin Phillips,[66] Sam Harris,[67] Ryan Lizza,[68] Frank Schaeffer,[69] and the group TheocracyWatch.[70] Some authors have applied the term to a broader spectrum of people than have Diamond, Clarkson, and Berlet.

Sarah Posner in Salon argues that there are various "iterations of dominionism that call on Christians to enter... government, law, media and so forth... so that they are controlled by Christians." According to Posner, "Christian right figures promoted dominionism... and the GOP courted... religious leaders for the votes of their followers." She added: "If people really understood dominionism, they’d worry about it between election cycles."[71]

Michelle Goldberg notes[72] that George Grant wrote in his 1987 book The Changing of the Guard: Biblical Principles for Political Action:

Christians have an obligation, a mandate, a commission, a holy responsibility to reclaim the land for Jesus Christ—to have dominion in civil structures, just as in every other aspect of life and godliness.... But it is dominion we are after. Not just a voice.... Christian politics has as its primary intent the conquest of the land—of men, families, institutions, bureaucracies, courts, and governments for the Kingdom of Christ.

Spectrum of dominionism

edit

Writers including Chip Berlet[73] and Frederick Clarkson[55] distinguish between what they term "hard" and "soft" dominionism. Such commentators define "soft" dominionism as the belief that "America is a Christian nation" and opposition to separation of church and state, but "hard" dominionism refers to dominion theology and Christian reconstructionism.

Michelle Goldberg uses the terms Christian nationalism and dominionism for the former view.[64] According to Goldberg:

In many ways, Dominionism is more a political phenomenon than a theological one. It cuts across Christian denominations, from stern, austere sects to the signs-and-wonders culture of modern megachurches. Think of it like political Islamism, which shapes the activism of a number of antagonistic fundamentalist movements, from Sunni Wahabis in the Arab world to Shiite fundamentalists in Iran.[74]

Berlet and Clarkson have agreed, "Soft Dominionists are Christian nationalists."[73] Unlike "dominionism", the phrase "Christian nation" occurs commonly in the writings of leaders of the Christian right. Proponents of the idea (such as David Barton and D. James Kennedy) argue that the Founding Fathers of the United States were overwhelmingly Christian, that founding documents such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are based on Christian principles, and that a Christian character is fundamental to American culture.[75][76][77] They cite, for example, the U.S. Supreme Court's comment in 1892 that "this [the United States] is a Christian nation"[78] after they cite numerous historical and legal arguments in support of that statement.[79]

Kennedy characterized his perspective on Christian political involvement as more akin to participatory democracy than to dominionism. In an interview with NPR's Terry Gross, Kennedy was asked whether he wanted all public office holders to be Christians. Kennedy answered, "We have people who are secular and humanist and unbelievers who are constantly supporting in every way possible other people who share those views. And I don't object to that. That's their privilege. And I think that Christians should be allowed the same privilege to vote for people whom they believe share their views about life and government. And that's all I'm talking about."[80]

Criticism of usage of term

edit

Those labelled dominionists rarely use the terms dominionist and dominionism for self-description, and some people have attacked the use of such words.[7] The journalist and conservative commentator Stanley Kurtz, writing for the National Review, labeled it "conspiratorial nonsense," "political paranoia," and "guilt by association",[81] and decried Hedges' "vague characterizations" that allow him to "paint a highly questionable picture of a virtually faceless and nameless 'Dominionist' Christian mass".[82] Kurtz also complained about a perceived link between average Christian evangelicals and extremism such as Christian reconstructionism:

The notion that conservative Christians want to reinstitute slavery and rule by genocide is not just crazy, it's downright dangerous. The most disturbing part of the Harper's cover story (the one by Chris Hedges) was the attempt to link Christian conservatives with Hitler and fascism. Once we acknowledge the similarity between conservative Christians and fascists, Hedges appears to suggest, we can confront Christian evil by setting aside 'the old polite rules of democracy.' So wild conspiracy theories and visions of genocide are really excuses for the Left to disregard the rules of democracy and defeat conservative Christians—by any means necessary.[81]

Joe Carter of First Things writes:

[T]here is no "school of thought" known as "dominionism." The term was coined in the 1980s by Diamond and is never used outside liberal blogs and websites. No reputable scholars use the term for it is a meaningless neologism that Diamond concocted for her dissertation.[83]

Diamond denies that she coined the broader sense of the term dominionism,[84] which appears in her dissertation and in Roads to Dominion solely to describe dominion theology. Nevertheless, Diamond originated the idea that dominion theology is the "central unifying ideology for the Christian Right."[46]: 138 

Jeremy Pierce of First Things coined the word dominionismist to describe those who promote the idea that there is a dominionist conspiracy and wrote:

It strikes me as irresponsible to lump [Rushdoony] together with Francis Schaeffer and those influenced by him, especially given Schaeffer's many recorded instances of resisting exactly the kinds of views Rushdoony developed. Indeed, it strikes me as an error of the magnitude of some of Rushdoony's own historical nonsense to consider there to be such a view called Dominionism [sic] that Rushdoony, Schaeffer, James Dobson, and all the other people in the list somehow share and that it seeks to get Christians and only Christians into all the influential positions in secular society.[85]

Lisa Miller of Newsweek writes that "'dominionism' is the paranoid mot du jour" and that "certain journalists use 'dominionist' the way some folks on Fox News use the word sharia. Its strangeness scares people. Without history or context, the word creates a siege mentality in which 'we' need to guard against 'them'."[86] Ross Douthat of The New York Times noted that "many of the people that writers like Diamond and others describe as 'dominionists' would disavow the label, many definitions of dominionism conflate several very different Christian political theologies, and there's a lively debate about whether the term is even useful at all."[87]

Other criticism has focused on the proper use of the term. Berlet wrote that "just because some critics of the Christian Right have stretched the term dominionism past its breaking point does not mean we should abandon the term,"[88] and argued that rather than label conservatives as extremists, it would be better to "talk to these people" and "engage them."[89] Diamond wrote, "Liberals' writing about the Christian Right's take-over plans has generally taken the form of conspiracy theory" and argued that instead, one should "analyze the subtle ways" that ideas like Dominionism "take hold within movements and why."[53] The authors Robert Gagnon and Edith Humphrey argued strongly against the use of the term in reference to the US presidential candidate Ted Cruz in a 2016 op-ed for Christianity Today.[90]

See also

edit

References

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ a b Nel, Marius (16 September 2019). African Pentecostalism and Eschatological Expectations: He is Coming Back Again!. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 74. ISBN 978-1-5275-4007-1. In pentecostal practice, the attention of Christian life moved from the "other world" to this world, and the expectancy of the kingdom that would realise in this lifetime changed to "kingdom now" that eventually ended in dominion theology (dominionism), a group of Christian political ideologies that seeks to institute a nation governed by Christians where biblical law would be upheld. Other ideologies represented by this thinking include theologically diverse groups like Calvinist Christian reconstructionism and Roman Catholic integralism.
  2. ^ a b Faggioli, Massimo (18 July 2017). "Why Should We Read Spadaro on 'Catholic Integralism'?". Commonweal. Retrieved 20 July 2017. Spadaro and Figueroa capture this tension most explicitly when they point out the difference between the "dominionist" political culture of the conservative political ecumenism of "Evangelical and Catholic integralists," and Pope Francis's acceptance of the distinction between political power and religious authority.
  3. ^ a b Hunt, Dave 1988. Whatever Happened to Heaven? Harvest House.
  4. ^ a b Dager, Albert James. 1990. Vengeance is Ours: The Church in Dominion Sword Publishers; The World Christian Movement Sword Publishers.
  5. ^ a b Lindsey, Hal 1990. The Road to Holocaust, Bantam
  6. ^ a b Ice, Thomas, and H. Wayne House 1988. Dominion Theology: Blessing or Curse?, Multnomah Pub (ISBN 0-88070-261-3)
  7. ^ a b McVicar, Michael J. (2013). "'Let them have Dominion:' 'Dominion Theology' and the Construction of Religious Extremism in the US Media". Journal of Religion and Popular Culture. 25 (1): 120–145. doi:10.3138/jrpc.25.1.120. S2CID 143317815.
  8. ^ Vlas, Natalia; Vasile Borari (26 July 2013). Religion and Politics in the 21st Century: Global and Local Reflections. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 203. ISBN 978-1-4438-5076-6. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
  9. ^ "5 Facts About Dominionism". 1 September 2011. Retrieved 3 November 2017 – via Huff Post.
  10. ^ Martin, William (1996). With God on Our Side: The Rise of the Religious Right in America. New York: Broadway Books.[page needed]
  11. ^ Diamond, Sara (1998). Not by Politics Alone: The Enduring Influence of the Christian Right. New York: Guilford Press. p. 213.
  12. ^ Ortiz, Chris (2007). "Gary North on D. James Kennedy". Chalcedon Blog. Chalcedon Foundation. Archived from the original on 11 October 2009. Retrieved 6 September 2007.
  13. ^ "Church in Fayetteville, NC". Providence ARP. 2003. Retrieved 2023-06-03.
  14. ^ Isbell, Sherman 1997. "The Divine Law of Political Israel Expired: Part II Archived 2007-03-17 at the Wayback Machine and Part III Archived 2007-03-21 at the Wayback Machine". Retrieved 6 October 2007.
  15. ^ Poythress, Vern S. 1991. The Shadow of Christ in the Law of Moses. Brentwood Tennessee: Wolgemuth & Hyatt Publishers Inc.
  16. ^ Godfrey, W. Robert 1990, "Calvin and Theonomy," in Theonomy: A Reformed Critique, William S. Barker and W. Robert Godfrey eds., pp. 299–312, (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Academie Books, 1990).
  17. ^ Ferguson, Sinclair 1990. "An Assembly of Theonomists?" in Theonomy: A Reformed Critique, William S. Barker and W. Robert Godfrey eds., pp. 315–349, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Academie Books, 1990.
  18. ^ McVicar, Michael J. (Fall 2007), "The Libertarian Theocrats: The Long, Strange History of RJ Rushdoony and Christian Reconstructionism", Public Eye, 22 (3), archived from the original on 23 August 2013, retrieved 24 August 2013
  19. ^ Barron, Bruce A. (1992). Heaven on earth?: the social & political agendas of dominion theology. Grand Rapids, Mich: Zondervan. ISBN 0-310-53611-1.
  20. ^ Davis, Derek H.; Hankins, Barry (2003). New Religious Movements and Religious Liberty in America. Baylor University Press. ISBN 0918954924.[page needed]
  21. ^ Davidson, Carl; Harris, Jerry (2006). "Globalisation, theocracy and the new fascism: the US Right's rise to power" (PDF). Race & Class. 47 (3): 47–67. doi:10.1177/0306396806061086. S2CID 143793920. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 26, 2022.
  22. ^ Spadaro, Antonio; Figueroa, Marcelo (2017). "Evangelical Fundamentalism and Catholic Integralism in the USA: A surprising ecumenism". La Civiltà Cattolica. Retrieved 20 July 2017.
  23. ^ Glatz, Carol (13 July 2017). "Journal: Strip religious garb, fundamentalist tones from political power". Catholic News Service. Archived from the original on July 13, 2017. Retrieved 20 July 2017.
  24. ^ McElwee, Joshua J. (13 July 2017). "Italian Jesuit magazine criticizes political attitudes of some US Catholics". National Catholic Reporter. Retrieved 20 July 2017.
  25. ^ Douthat, Ross (2016-10-08). "Opinion | Among the Post-Liberals". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2023-06-03.
  26. ^ Pope Pius IX (1864). "The Syllabus Of Errors". Retrieved 11 March 2021 – via papalencyclicals.net.
  27. ^ Schwartzman, Micah; Wilson, Jocelyn (2019). "The Unreasonableness of Catholic Integralism". San Diego Law Review. 56: 1039–1041.
  28. ^ "Published by Editiones Scholasticae in 2020". Archived from the original on 2020-06-15. Retrieved 2022-06-14.
  29. ^ Anderson, Gordon (Summer 1990). "Kingdom now theology : a look at its roots and branches". Paraclete. 24 (3): 1–12.
  30. ^ Griffin, William A (Spring 1988). "Kingdom Now : New Hope or New Heresy". Eastern Journal of Practical Theology. 2: 6–36.
  31. ^ "An Examination of Kingdom Theology". Apologetics Index. Retrieved 30 January 2011.
  32. ^ Wagner, C. Peter (2008). Dominion!: How Kingdom Action Can Change the World. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Chosen Books. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-8007-9435-4.
  33. ^ a b Steinkamp, Orrel (November–December 2003). "The "Script" Underlying Spiritual Warfare Christianity". The Plumbline. 8 (4). Retrieved 6 November 2010.
  34. ^ West, Marsha (25 May 2010). "Damnable Heresies Invading the Church". Conservative Crusader. Archived from the original on 20 November 2010. Retrieved 6 November 2010.
  35. ^ Bowman, Robert M. (Fall 1987). "The Faulty Foundation of the Five-Fold Ministry". Christian Research Journal: 31. Retrieved 6 November 2010.
  36. ^ French, David (28 February 2021). "How a Rising Religious Movement Rationalizes the Christian Grasp for Power". frenchpress.thedispatch.com. Retrieved 2021-09-15.
  37. ^ a b Hardy, Elle (March 19, 2020). "The "modern apostles" who want to reshape America ahead of the end times". The Outline. Retrieved 2021-09-15.
  38. ^ a b Matirko, Jack (2019-02-20). "Dominionism in America Part 5: The Seven Mountains Mandate". Patheos. Archived from the original on 2019-02-20. Retrieved 2021-09-15.
  39. ^ "Bible Gateway passage: Isaiah 2:2-3 - New International Version". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2021-09-15.
  40. ^ "Bible Gateway passage: Revelation 17 - New International Version". Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2021-09-15.
  41. ^ "World's scariest conspiracy theory". adelaidenow. 2018-12-14. Retrieved 2021-09-15.
  42. ^ Hardy, Elle (15 January 2021). "How a conservative Christian movement became an important part of Trump's political strategy". CBC Radio. Retrieved 15 September 2021.
  43. ^ "Neocharismatic Christianity and the Rise of the New Apostolic Reformation". Firebrand Magazine. 18 January 2021. Retrieved 2021-09-15.
  44. ^ "Ted Cruz's campaign is fueled by a dominionist vision for America (COMMENTARY)". Religion News Service. 2016-02-04. Retrieved 2021-09-15.
  45. ^ "John Fea on Ted Cruz's Dominionism – Warren Throckmorton". 4 February 2016. Retrieved 2021-09-15.
  46. ^ a b c Diamond, Sara (1989). Spiritual Warfare: The Politics of the Christian Right. Boston: South End Press.
  47. ^ Diamond, Sara (1995). Roads to Dominion: Right-Wing Movements and Political Power in the United States. New York: Guilford Press. p. 246. ISBN 0-89862-864-4.
  48. ^ a b Diamond, Sara (February 1995). "Dominion Theology". Z Magazine. Archived from the original on 15 May 2013. Retrieved 24 August 2013.
  49. ^ Bruce Barron and Anson Shupe, 1992, "Reasons for the Growing Popularity of Christian Reconstructionism: The Determination to Attain Dominion", in Bronislaw Misztal and Anson D. Shupe, eds. Religion and politics in comparative perspective: revival of religious fundamentalism in East and West. Westport, Conn: Praeger, p. 85.
  50. ^ Clarkson, Frederick (March–June 1994). "Christian Reconstructionism: Theocratic Dominionism Gains Influence". The Public Eye. 8 (1 & 2). Political Research Associates.
  51. ^ Clarkson, Frederick (1997). Eternal Hostility: The Struggle Between Theocracy and Democracy. Monroe, Maine: Common Courage. ISBN 1-56751-088-4.[page needed]
  52. ^ Barron, Bruce A. (1992). Heaven on earth?: the social & political agendas of dominion theology. Grand Rapids, Mich: Zondervan. p. 14. ISBN 0-310-53611-1.
  53. ^ a b Diamond, Sara. 1995. "Dominion Theology." Z Magazine, February 1995
  54. ^ Chip Berlet, "Following the Threads," in Ansell, Amy E. Unraveling the Right: The New Conservatism in American Thought and Politics, p. 24, Westview Press, 1998, ISBN 0-8133-3147-1
  55. ^ a b c Clarkson, Frederick (Winter 2005). "The Rise of Dominionism: Remaking America as a Christian Nation". The Public Eye. 19 (3). Retrieved 2016-02-10.
  56. ^ Yurica, Katherine (11 February 2004). "The Despoiling of America". Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 3 October 2007. Also published in Barry F. Seidman and Neil J. Murphy, ed. (2004). Toward a New Political Humanism. New York: Prometheus Books.[page needed]
  57. ^ Yurica, Katherine (January 19, 2005). "Why the Bible Commands You to Be a Liberal (And Vote for Democrats)". Archived from the original on September 30, 2009. Retrieved January 19, 2010.
  58. ^ Yurica, Katherine (23 May 2005). "Yurica Responds to Stanley Kurtz Attack". Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 6 October 2007.
  59. ^ The Christian Right and the Rise of American Fascism By Chris Hedges Archived 2008-05-11 at the Wayback Machine, TheocracyWatch.
  60. ^ Hedges, Chris (May 2005). "Feeling the hate with the National Religious Broadcasters". Harper's. Retrieved 2007-04-11.
  61. ^ Hedges, Chris, American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America, Free Press, 2006
  62. ^ Maddox, Marion 2005. God under Howard: The Rise of the Religious Right in Australian Politics, Allen & Unwin.
  63. ^ Rudin, James 2006. The Baptizing of America: The Religious Right's Plans for the Rest of Us, New York: Thunder's Mouth Press.
  64. ^ a b Goldberg, Michelle 2006. Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN 0-393-06094-2 (10). ISBN 978-0-393-06094-2 (13).
  65. ^ Goldberg, Michelle 2011. "A Christian Plot for Domination?". The Daily Beast. Published 14 August 2011. Retrieved 9 September 2011.
  66. ^ Phillips, Kevin 2006. American Theocracy: The Peril and Politics of Radical Religion, Oil, and Borrowed Money in the 21st Century ISBN 0-670-03486-X
  67. ^ Harris, Sam 2007. "God's dupes," Los Angeles Times, 15 March 2007. Retrieved 8 October 2007
  68. ^ Lizza, Ryan 2011. "Leap of Faith". The New Yorker. Published 15 August 2011. Retrieved 9 September 2011.
  69. ^ Frank Schaeffer, August 9, 2011, "Michele Bachmann Was Inspired By My Dad and His Christian Reconstructionist Friends – Here's Why That's Terrifying." Alternet. Retrieved 3 January 2017.
  70. ^ "The Rise of the Religious Right in the Republican Party," TheocracyWatch, December 2005. Retrieved May 8, 2006.
  71. ^ "The Christian right's "dominionist" strategy". Salon. 2011-08-21. Retrieved 2023-06-03.
  72. ^ ""Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism"". Salon. 2006-05-12. Retrieved 2023-06-03.
  73. ^ a b Chip Berlet The Christian Right, Dominionism, and Theocracy: Part Two Archived February 11, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  74. ^ Goldberg, Michelle (2011-08-15). "Dominionism: Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry's Dangerous Religious Bond". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 2023-06-03.
  75. ^ Barton, David 1993. America's Godly Heritage. WallBuilder Press.
  76. ^ Kennedy, D. James and Jim Nelson Black 1994. Character and Destiny: A Nation in Search of Its Soul. Zondervan Publishing.
  77. ^ Kennedy, D. James and Jerry Newcombe 2003. What If America Were a Christian Nation Again? Thomas Nelson.
  78. ^ Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U.S. 457, 12 S.Ct. 511, 36 L.Ed. 226, 29 February 1892
  79. ^ "Christian Roots of America". Archived from the original on 4 July 2008. Retrieved 3 November 2017.
  80. ^ "Closing the Gap Between Church and State". NPR.org. Retrieved 2018-03-25.
  81. ^ a b Stanley Kurtz (2005-05-02). "Dominionist Domination: The Left runs with a wild theory". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-10-06.
  82. ^ Stanley Kurtz (2005-04-28). "Scary Stuff". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-10-06.
  83. ^ "A Journalism Lesson for the New Yorker | Joe Carter". First Things. 2011-08-10. Retrieved 2023-06-03.
  84. ^ Chip Berlet, 2011, "How We Coined the Term 'Dominionism'" Talk to Action, August 31, [1]
  85. ^ Pierce, Jeremy, 2011. Dominionismists. First Things. Published 14 August 2011. Retrieved 8 September 2011.
  86. ^ "'Dominionism' beliefs among conservative Christians overblown – The Washington Post". www.washingtonpost.com. Retrieved 2023-06-03.
  87. ^ "The New Yorker and Francis Schaeffer". Ross Douthat. 2011-08-29. Retrieved 2023-06-03.
  88. ^ Berlet, Chip, 2005. The Christian Right, Dominionism, and Theocracy Archived September 18, 2008, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 25 September 2007.
  89. ^ Ellis Henican, "A spiritual olive branch for the far-right faithful" Archived 2008-10-06 at the Wayback Machine. Newsday, May 1, 2005. Reposted at YuricaReport.com. Retrieved 23 September 2006
  90. ^ "Stop Calling Ted Cruz a Dominionist". 6 April 2016. Retrieved 3 November 2017.

Bibliography

edit
edit

Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Dominion_theology&oldid=1256498350"