Wikipedia

Carbon Tracker

(Redirected from Carbon Tracker Initiative)

Carbon Tracker is a London-based not-for-profit think tank researching the impact of climate change on financial markets.

Carbon Tracker
TypeNon-profit financial think tank
HeadquartersLondon, United Kingdom
Websitecarbontracker.org
Formerly called
Carbon Tracker Initiative

Carbon Tracker popularized the notion of a carbon bubble, which describes the incompatibility between the continued development of fossil fuel projects and combating climate change.[1][2]

History and work

edit

Carbon Tracker was founded by UK fund manager Mark Campanale, with Jeremy Leggett serving as chairman.[3] The organisation's first two reports – Unburnable Carbon (2011) and Unburnable Carbon (2013) – argued that up to two-thirds of the world's known reserves and resources of oil, coal and gas could not be burned while avoiding dangerous levels of climate change. As summarized by Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf: "The conclusion is quite simple: burning known reserves of fossil fuels is incompatible with meeting the climate targets governments have set themselves."[4]

The Paris Agreement, adopted internationally in December 2015, aims to keep the global average temperature rise below 2 °C of warming, to avoid and reduce some of the most severe risks and impacts of climate change. But this requires carbon dioxide levels emitted in the atmosphere by 2050 to not exceed a "carbon budget" of up to 900 gigatonnes.[5] Drawing on research from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Carbon Tracker's reports showed that the world's reserves and resources of coal, oil and gas, if burned, would emit more than three times this amount: approximately 2800 gigatonnes. This raises the possibility that, by financing the development and production of fossil fuels that might never be consumed, investors are exposed to the risk of "stranded assets", rendered unprofitable by climate regulations and technological alternatives such as renewable energy.[6] Reuters described this idea – that investors were financing a "carbon bubble" – as having become 'part of "the climate change lexicon"; it has formed the basis for warnings about "stranded assets" by Bank of England Governor Mark Carney and inspired groups like Norway's sovereign wealth fund to divest billions in fossil fuel holdings'.[7]

Carbon Tracker's subsequent research investigated the implications of lower demand and low-carbon scenarios for the different fossil fuels of fossil fuels against lower demand, price and carbon emissions scenarios.[8][9][10][11]

Mark Carney echoed Carbon Tracker's warning on stranded assets in a 2015 speech to London insurers.[12] followed by the launch of a task force on climate-related financial disclosures under the auspices of the Financial Stability Board.[13]

Reports

edit

Carbon Tracker's reports include:[14]

  • Unburnable carbon – Are the world's financial markets carrying a bubble? (2011)
  • Unburnable carbon 2013: Wasted capital and stranded assets (2013) (joint research with the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics) [15]
  • Carbon Supply Cost Curves series:
    • Carbon Supply Cost Curves: Evaluating Financial Risk to Oil Capital Expenditures (2014) [16][17]
    • Carbon Supply Cost Curves: Evaluating Financial Risk to Coal Capital Expenditures (2014) [18]
    • Carbon Supply Cost Curves: Evaluating Financial Risk to Gas Capital Expenditures (2015) [19]
  • Lost in Transition: How the energy sector is missing potential demand destruction (2015) [20][21]
  • The $2 Trillion Stranded Asset Danger Zone: How fossil fuel firms risk destroying investor returns (2015) [22]
  • Sense and Sensitivity: Maximising Value with a 2D Portfolio (2016) [23][24]
  • Expect the Unexpected: The Disruptive Power of Low-carbon Technology (2017) (joint research with the Grantham Institute - Climate Change and Environment at Imperial College) [25][26]
  • Apocoalypse now (2019) [27]
  • How to waste over half a trillion dollars (2020) [28]
  • Poland's energy dilemma: new gas power traps taxpayers in a costly future (2022) [29][30]

In the media

edit

In 2012, a Rolling Stone article by writer and campaigner Bill McKibben presented Carbon Tracker's research on the carbon bubble to a wider audience[31][32] The article led McKibben to start a campaign calling for fossil fuel divestment which, as of December 2015, saw organisations managing over $5.46 trillion committing to partial or total divestment.[33][34]

Carbon Tracker's analysis has been cited by investment banks HSBC,[35] Citi[36] and JP Morgan,[37] consultancies such as Accenture,[38] and the Dutch Central Bank.[39] It has also provoked a range of responses from major oil companies: ExxonMobil has stated it is 'confident that none of our hydrocarbon reserves are now or will become "stranded."' [40] Chevron, while admitting that "certain high-cost assets around the world could be impacted by a hypothetical GHG-constrained case", has similarly argued that the risk of stranded assets is "manageable".[41] Different positions have also been expressed by BP[42] and Statoil.[43]

According to the Carbon Tracker Initiative report in March 2020 wind farms and solar plants will soon be cheaper than running existing coal-fired power stations and coal power would struggle if markets were priced fairly.[44]

References

edit
  1. ^ Jackie Wills, "Carbon Tracker has changed the financial language of climate change" Archived 8 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 15 May 2014 (page visited on 8 November 2016).
  2. ^ Katharine Earley, "Carbon Tracker measures oil and coal risk for investors" Archived 26 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 30 April 2015 (page visited on 8 November 2016).
  3. ^ "September–October – The Unburnable Carbon Bubble". Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  4. ^ Wolf, Martin (17 June 2014). "A climate fix would ruin investors". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 13 February 2023.
  5. ^ Malte Meinshausen, Nicolai Meinshausen, William Hare, Sarah Raper, Katja Frieler, Reto Knutti, David Frame and Myles Allen, "Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C" Archived 19 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Nature, volume 458, pages 1158–1163, 2009.
  6. ^ "At about that time, the carbon budget idea was plucked from academia by Carbon Tracker, a small London think-tank founded by Mark Campanale, one of the city's first sustainable investment analysts. Applying the research to the world's coal mines, oil wells and gasfields, the think-tank said that to have even a small chance of meeting the 2C target, only 565 gigatonnes of CO2 could be emitted up to 2050. But the known fossil fuel reserves of energy and mining companies were equal to 2,795 gigatonnes of CO2. So if the world ever took serious action to meet the 2C goal, most of those reserves would become "unburnable" stranded assets." Carney on climate: Stranded fossil fuel theory proves potent, Financial Times, 30 September 2015". Archived from the original on 21 February 2017. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  7. ^ "From Bangladesh flood map to the Bank of England, a 'carbon bubble' is born". Reuters. 7 December 2016. Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
  8. ^ "Oil Sands are Biggest Losers From Low Crude Prices: Study". Bloomberg. Bloomberg L.P. 15 August 2014. Archived from the original on 21 November 2017. Retrieved 10 May 2017.
  9. ^ "Carbon Tracker Sees $283 Billion of LNG Projects as Uneconomic,Bloomberg, 2015". Bloomberg News. 6 July 2015. Archived from the original on 26 January 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  10. ^ "New coal mines uneconomic as China demand growth slows: Report", Economic Times, 22 September 2014[permanent dead link]
  11. ^ "Energy Companies Risk $2.2 Trillion as Climate Goals Cut Demand". Bloomberg L.P. 25 November 2015. Archived from the original on 25 March 2016. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  12. ^ Clark, Pilita (29 September 2015). "Mark Carney warns investors face 'huge' climate change losses". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 25 March 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2017. "wholesale reassessment of prospects, especially if it were to occur suddenly, could potentially destabilise markets," he (Mark Carney) said, echoing warnings from the Carbon Tracker think-tank in London that pioneered the stranded carbon assets idea several years ago
  13. ^ "Energy Companies Risk $2.2 Trillion as Climate Goals Cut Demand, Bloomberg, 25 November 2015". Bloomberg News. 4 December 2015. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  14. ^ Brochure Archived 4 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Carbon Tracker Initiative (page visited on 8 November 2016).
  15. ^ "Investor Group Presses Oil Companies on 'Unburnable Carbon', Bloomberg, 2013". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 21 June 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  16. ^ Garside, Ben (7 May 2014). "Climate rules could put $1.1 trl in oil investment at risk -report". Reuters. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  17. ^ ""Oil groups warned over spending on high-cost areas", Financial Times, 8 May 2014". Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  18. ^ ""The Carbon Tracker Initiative (CTI) has also launched a new report: Carbon Supply Cost Curves: Evaluating Financial Risk to Coal Capital Expenditures, which provides investors and coal companies with a tool – the carbon supply cost curve – to help identify the projects where the most financial risk lies", Dina Medland, 'Green And Growth Can Go Hand In Hand Together', 2014, Forbes". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 25 August 2017.
  19. ^ Carrington, Damian (6 July 2015). ""Billions in gas projects stranded by climate change action, says thinktank", The Guardian, 7 July 2015". TheGuardian.com. Archived from the original on 24 February 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  20. ^ "Lost in Transition: How the energy sector is missing potential demand destruction". carbontracker.org. Archived from the original on 26 October 2015. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
  21. ^ ""Are energy companies leading shareholders astray on future fossil fuel demand?", International Business Times, 21 October 2015". International Business Times. 21 October 2015. Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
  22. ^ "Oil and gas companies 'risk losing $2tn', BBC News, 25 November 2015". BBC News. 25 November 2015. Archived from the original on 3 December 2018. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
  23. ^ ""A study just out by the Carbon Tracker initiative has a tantalizing conclusion for the oil and gas industry. If they align their investment plans with the 2 °C target on global temperatures, the upstream assets of the world's seven largest listed oil and gas companies could collectively be worth $100 billion more, it says.", Oil And Gas: Change And Prosper? A New Growth Scenario In A 2-Degree World, Forbes, 5 May 2016". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 25 August 2017.
  24. ^ ""Two reports issued this week suggest that investors should strive to keep the spending straitjacket on oil companies even if prices improve further. One, by Carbon Tracker [...] seeks to show that pursuing new reserves at all costs would not only be bad for the environment, it would be bad business. It argues that even if climate-change policies severely constrain demand for oil, companies will still need to produce more of the black stuff. But if oil prices are anywhere below $120 a barrel, they would produce higher returns if they carry out selective drilling of low-cost wells rather than "business as usual".", Not-so-Big Oil, The Economist, 7 May 2016". The Economist. Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 25 August 2017.
  25. ^ "Expect the Unexpected: The Disruptive Power of Low-carbon Technology". carbontracker.org. Archived from the original on 21 May 2017. Retrieved 11 May 2017.
  26. ^ "Cheaper renewables to halt coal and oil demand growth from 2020: research", Reuters, February 2, 2017[dead link]
  27. ^ Gray, Matt; D'souza, Durand; Sundaresan, Sriya (24 October 2019). Apocoalypse now. London, United Kingdom: Carbon Tracker. Registration required to download.
  28. ^ Gray, Matt; Sundaresan, Sriya (March 2020). How to waste over half a trillion dollars: the economic implications of deflationary renewable energy for coal power investments. London, United Kingdom: Carbon Tracker. Landing page. Registration required to download.
  29. ^ Sims, Jonathan; Sani, Lorenzo (February 2022). Poland's energy dilemma: new gas power traps taxpayers in a costly future — Analysts note. London, United Kingdom: Carbon Tracker Initiative. Registration required to download.
  30. ^ Carbon Tracker (10 February 2022). "Poland's energy dilemma: new gas power traps taxpayers in a costly future". Carbon Tracker Initiative. London, United Kingdom. Archived from the original on 10 February 2022. Retrieved 10 February 2022. Landing page.
  31. ^ Bill McKibben "Global Warming's Terrifying New Math: Three simple numbers that add up to global catastrophe – and that make clear who the real enemy is" Archived 7 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine, Rolling Stone, 19 July 2012 (page visited on 8 November 2016).
  32. ^ Matthew C. Nisbet (March 2013). "Nature's Prophet: Bill McKibben as Journalist, Public Intellectual and Activist" (PDF) Archived 19 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine Discussion Paper Series #D-78. Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, School of Communication and the Center for Social Media American University. p. 17.
  33. ^ "I did base that article, and the subsequent divestment campaign, on CTI's numbers," he [Bill McKibben, n.b.] tells RTCC in an email." www.climatechangenews.com/2015/08/18/terrifying-math-how-carbon-tracker-changed-the-climate-debate/
  34. ^ "Commitments". Archived from the original on 19 November 2017. Retrieved 3 October 2016.
  35. ^ "Stranded assets: what next?" (PDF). HSBC Global Research. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 September 2019. Retrieved 4 August 2021.
  36. ^ "Energy Darwinism II. Why a Low Carbon Future Doesn't Have to Cost the Earth – Climate Policy Observer". Archived from the original on 10 November 2016. Retrieved 3 October 2016.
  37. ^ JP Morgan North American Equity Research, Clean Tech Monitor, 1 October 2013
  38. ^ "Energy Perspectives: Rougher Seas Ahead" (PDF). Accenture Strategy Energy. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 February 2017. Retrieved 3 October 2016.
  39. ^ http://www.dnb.nl/en/binaries/TimeforTransition_tcm47-338545.pdf?2016100316[permanent dead link]
  40. ^ " http://cdn.exxonmobil.com/~/media/global/files/energy-and-environment/report---energy-and-carbon---managing-the-risks.pdf Archived 5 January 2019 at the Wayback Machine
  41. ^ "The possible risk from 'stranded assets' is minimal and certainly manageable" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 June 2017. Retrieved 10 May 2017.
  42. ^ "Notice of BP Annual General Meeting 2015" (PDF). BP. 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 December 2018. Retrieved 4 August 2021.
  43. ^ "Newsroom - Newsroom - statoil.com" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 September 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2016.
  44. ^ Wind and solar plants will soon be cheaper than coal in all big markets around world Archived 12 March 2020 at the Wayback Machine 12 March 2020
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Carbon_Tracker&oldid=1254460320"